Again, your point is not that you think there should be places without politics, it's just licking the boot of authority, deferring to rules. It's comfortable, I suppose.
After all, some people might want to come here to talk about video games and don't want some political message thrown in their faces when they are discussing the newest raid.
Well, Blitzchung achieved at least something. And I think he was well aware of the sacrifice and was willing to make it.
Regarding video game companies' dependency on China, he pretty much put the finger in the wound. So he has that going for him, too.
He not only promoted the HK issue, but also raised awareness regarding the western apathy towards the HK issue. That's another point for him.
Sometimes, playing by the "rules" gets you nowhere. Because the "rules" were made by those in power to behave to their advantage and convenience.
'How dare those black athlete's raise their fist at the Olympics when they've been placed on the medal platform. I want my sports free of politics, thanks.'
"It's 2013 and I still view the internet on a 560x192 resolution monitor!"
No, nothing eludes me.
It's just funny to me that you're still backtracking, still trying to find shaky excuses and scrambling for false equivalences in order to avoid being rightfully labeled a massive hypocrite.
At this point, I'm just enjoying myself. Mind you, you already conceded a few posts ago.
- - - Updated - - -
That sure.. is a take.
Yes, and those countries can do whatever the fuck they want in THEIR country.
When I get told about what I can say and do by a foreign country through a proxy that is blackmailed by that country to enforce its values on me, I have a big issue with it.
Also these Western companies talk about progressiveness and inclusivity, and calling me a white supremacist for disagreeing with their shit, BUT at the same time they do business with parties for whom these notions are not only jokes but are out right offensive.
That is some fucking epic hypocrisy right there, and quite insulting to me.
LoLHK: "League of Liberate Hong Kong"
But what when the games you play are already affected by politics and you don't even know about?
The chinese market pretty much dictates what part of your game gets censored, it dictates in which kind of games will be invested first and foremost (do you not have phones??).
Honestly, this is the real reason why people jump on this. The human rights aspect is just a bonus, a welcome trigger. Even if you don't care about HK one bit, you should be at least aware how that new and steadily growing market will affect YOUR hobby now and in the future.
a company doesn't want its platform used for political grandstanding.. color me shocked. You realize if they allowed one view they kinda have to allow others, right?
Member: Dragon Flight Alpha Club, Member since 7/20/22
Not surprised.
Tencent takes full control of League of Legends creator Riot Games
No they don't. A private corporation in USA is not bound by any kind of freedom of speech laws.
Last edited by Mumba; 2019-10-13 at 02:16 PM.