I haven't given two shits what Riot says since they figured the best way to fight their own sexism is with more sexism by banning men from attending their event.
PAX West 2018. Never forgetting.
Oof. Yeah, no. People have human rights simply by being humans.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Last edited by SwordofZoro; 2019-10-13 at 09:05 PM.
i believe you are thinking of civil rights, which are determined by goverment/ruling class and can be violated/followed as such - but Human rights are those rights that belong to every individual—man or women, girl or boy, infant or elder—simply because she or he is a human being. They embody the basic standards without which people cannot realize their inherent human dignity. these are set by no governing body and are universally expected to be followed, that is why other countries can hold places accountable for human rights violations and such, although it is difficult to enforce these violations.
Well, for one, there isn't even a town council where I live. It's literally just a farmers' land with kilometers inbetween neighbors. But I take it you have never lived in a very rural area? It's not uncommon for people who have lived their entire lives in urban/metropolitan areas to just assume they know how the world works. It's like these urban green people who want national bans on cars just because their local subway is so great.
If I were to deliver a letter about helping Hong Kong to my nearest town council, they'd just fall off their chair laughing, as the "politicians" in rural areas in my country are rarely connected to any political party, but rather local lists concerned with local issues. They have zero nill influence over international problems.
Protests at Blizzcon bunch of keyboard warriors pretending to give a shit about "the cause" lmao.
Is it wrong to secretly hope for violence? Wouldn't mind seeing some of these people get knocked on their ass
Subarashii chin chin mono
Kintama no kami aru
Subarashii chin chin mono
Kintama no kami aru
if govts didn't exist, then what? People revert to animals? Killing and eating one another? Of course not, because we all have rights, the foremost of those is the right to life. China is organ harvesting detainees, even if it's inconvenient for paid chinese shill posters to admit to it
Funny thing about this who situation is...If Blizzard had done nothing, nobody new would be posting about HK. Blizzards reaction is the only reason most of you are even posting. You wouldn't be doing anything to help the cause or raise awareness. Probably the same people who don't even know what Epstein means anymore.
you can see this by looking all over the world. countries all have different values. its perfectly fine to stone women in the street in some places, to kill babies, to murder enemies. there are no human rights. its all political. your own sensibilities do not make something true or real.
I wasn't going to respond to this thread (was just curious about the topic, it's been popular lately), but then I saw this gem of a post.
Please tell me that you're serious in that you can't see how this is ironic. That would make this perfect!
I mean, if you can't see how posting "don't bring politics to gaming" in a gaming forum with a political signature pushing to impeach the president isn't ironic, that's comedy gold. Thanks!
That's not what he said, though. He said, do what you can, when you can. Anything. Like planting a tree. Caring about where anything you buy comes from. Is it produced under fair conditions for the workers? Which companies to support, and which ones better not to support with my wallet? You can change markets with your purchase decision. Not alone, mind you, but if many are doing it, money talks.
Corporations are people, my friend.
Yeah, no. Just because you string some words together doesn't make what you wrote correct.
Again, from the USA Declaration of Independence
In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.-- That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."