Originally Posted by
Shiza
Only that the Forsaken always had a Villain vibe, so guess who never played the story. Sylvanas was already presented as a Villain-Protagonist in WC3 TFT. The Nathrezim compared Sylvanas nature with their own, all of her action were rather cruel, ruthless and traitorous. In WoW, the Forsaken became more sympathetic as a part of the Horde and with a more humanoid look (in TFT they were presented as regular scourge units). They still had a dark and rather villainous vibe to them. They had questionable schemes going on, were already deep into producing what would become the plague and generally acted cruel and dishonorably. They worked as a morally grey faction, because they dedicated everything to get vengeance on the Lichking and due to the Scarlet Crusade being the core threat of their starting zone. The Crusaders balanced things out, as they were even more cruel and villainous than the Forsaken despite representing the light and human Lordaeron, which gave justification to the Forsakens mistrust and hatred of the livings. They were sympathetic as villain-protagonists, because the traditional heroes were actually more evil than them.
Their sympathetic vibe always was, that they were kinda evil but fought opponents who are actually more evil than them. People liked them, because they were more focussed on dark themes and had a darker and more gothic-inspired visual theme. Calia not only breaks the tone of the Forsaken, the sympathetic villains, but also the visual style. She is fully Alliance themed, with her look failing to indicate undead and more looking like a Lightforged Human and her outfit combining a generally alliance human design with the bright alliance army of light color scheme. She fully breaks with everything that defines the Forsaken, thematically and visually, and yet is put into a position where she represents the whole race. This is bad. I mean, imagine if suddenly an Orc would become king of Stormwind. Or a Gnome High Priest of Elune.
The problem is also, that Calia is a full light character. This is also a nitpick on the attempts of making light and void both morally grey. You can't do that if you have no representation of the void being a good force and the light being a bad force. Which we barely have. What we have is Void elves, who are on the Alliance, and the Lightbound, who only appereared in a short alternative universe quest.
The Forsaken were always closer home to the void in terms of their priest class. Their priests are called dark clerics and it fits their visual theme perfectly. With the void elves serving as a strong representation of the void in the Alliance, it would have made sense to return to a focus towards the forgotten Shadow in the Forsaken, to recreat a representation of the shadow inside the Horde. After all, originally the Alliance in terms was always the light-themed faction and the Horde the shadow-themed, if you look at classic racials. But yeah, instead of doing something like this and making Calia a Shadow Priest who learned the ways of the forgotten Shadow, which would have put her culturally closer to the Forsaken, she remains a pure alliance style Light Priest. With this, the Horde is actually stronger light-themed than the Alliance.
- - - Updated - - -
We are probably not.