https://www.youtube.com/@DoffenGG
Gaming and WoW stuff
Well agree to disagree. Semantics are a bitch after all^^
But i truly think there will never.. Tinkers e.g. that ship is sailed. they said they want the class to have a connection to the addon. And i highly doubt there will be a complete addon around gnomes and goblins.
It doesn't need to be around Gnomes and Goblins. People really need to get off Tinkers being "Gnomes and Goblins." Although they are the biggest influence of Tinker there can be so much out there. I mean, in one of my original posts I posted about how it would be nice to see the inventions have different looks based on the race, crystal magitech from LD/Draenei or my favorite is actually Hydraulic looking inventions from the Undead.
But anyway, it's just a stupid thing to say it's been "Rejected." Under that belief, we're saying everything that happened in BFA was rejected until BFA was released. Everything that happened in Legion was rejected until Legion was released. Everything in WoD was rejected until WoD was released, etc, etc.
I concede a frost mage is unlikely to use fire blast. That was a poor example on my part. However, arcane explosion has been used by mages for stealth detection in PVP (when it was part of all mages toolkit) since Vanilla. It could be a useful addition in PVP for frost mages.
My question remains. If spec identity is the reason to limit frost mages to frost spells, fire mages to fire spells, and arcane mages to arcane spells, then why can all mages open portals and cast time warp? These are arcane spells.
I'm very concerned with all the backwards mindset of Classic players being forced onto retail.
Why is Shadowpriest getting Light spells back? They better not tone down the Void identity on the ONLY Void spec in the game.
Yes. That is correct. That is how it works. Everything is rejected until it is not. Unless you keep pretending that people only ever have one thought/thing on their mind and never look at options.
Like for example: For the last 10 years I rejected the idea of buying a bike. That's it. Rejected. If in another 10 years I decide to get one it doesn't all of a sudden magically mean that I hadn't rejected that idea before.
No, it's not. That's not how it works. It's rejected when they say "We're not doing it." They haven't said that at all. What is rejected currently is High Elves. You can find proof of that. Someone representing Blizzard has literally stated "We aren't doing High Elves". That is a rejection. No one has stated "We aren't doing Tinkers". The fact is they think of Expansions for the future, they could be working on Tinkers or Spellbreakers or Shadow Hunters right now and you're saying they're rejected.
Like, you guys don't seem to understand the difference between rejecting something ("We aren't going to do it") and not implementing something in the current expansion ("It doesn't fit release right now")
Last edited by DotEleven; 2019-11-07 at 05:49 PM.
Yeah I have never given a shit about class identity. I play my favorite specs not classes.
No, they haven't. Them not being in this expansion doesn't mean they have been rejected. It doesn't mean they don't ever plan to make them. It just means they don't fit right now. Dragon Isles doesn't fit Shadowlands, doesn't mean they aren't going to do it. Doesn't mean they've rejected the concept, just that it doesn't fit right now.
Why is it so hard for you to see the difference between "We aren't doing it" and "It's not a good fit right now"?
Seems to me like one of those things they took away only to give it back as a "new" feature. To be honest I'd rather keep it as it is then have them going "we decided it's time to bring the spec instead of the class... again".
Oh spare me the RP. I don't care about make believe. I care about reality and gameplay.
Also we haven't had 3 trees since a long time ago. But classic is there for you to fulfill your RP. The reality is the game hasn't been that way for a long time and for good reason, cause it ended up with an astonishingly unbalanced game wil loads of dead specs.
Also, you NEVER FORGOT YOUR SPELLS! They are just tucked away until you chance spec. You got no use for arcane blast as a frost mage. It is just bloat.
You can try to be condescending and insulting but when your argument is "RP" you already lost before you began.
Last edited by Swnem; 2019-11-07 at 06:27 PM.
Once again, that means that "Everything not included in Shadowlands has been rejected" which is just a stupid belief.
Once again, you are mistaking "Not a good fit right now" with "We aren't doing it" The first is what could've happened to Tinkers because Blizzard hasn't released any kind of statement. The second is what they've absolutely said about Playable High Elves.
Resistance and spell ranks don’t exist anymore and I hope they don’t bring those back.
Folks got to chill out. They wouldn't implement something that the majority didn't want.
If, like pruning, people don't like it, we'll see a return to spec identity. Or at least a balance between class and spec identity.
I personally can't wait to have some more homogenized specs that still lend themselves to the idea of doubling down on ONE ASPECT OF A CLASS.