Yeah people are going to go nuts on here when they reveal that Nathrezim are fel corrupted Venthyr.
Yeah people are going to go nuts on here when they reveal that Nathrezim are fel corrupted Venthyr.
Snarky: Adjective - Any language that contains quips or comments containing sarcastic or satirical witticisms intended as blunt irony. Usually delivered in a manner that is somewhat abrupt and out of context and intended to stun and amuse.
I’d say the biggest question was always that considering the Nathrezim were a demon race (one of the oldest), why they’d be so adept at using a power they themselves aren’t adherent to. They always did seem like the odd ones, especially compared to other original high ranked demons like the Pit Lords.
The problem I have with it all, is that the Dreadlords can do everything the Lich King can, despite being aligned with Fel. That’s what doesn’t match.
I mean they're nearly identical, it can't be a coincidence.
- - - Updated - - -
How do we know they're a demon race, though. Like Kil'Jaeden probably would have been called a demon too but draenei aren't demons.
Seems like at some point just everyone associated with the Burning Legion was labeled "demons" and never fact-checked.
Snarky: Adjective - Any language that contains quips or comments containing sarcastic or satirical witticisms intended as blunt irony. Usually delivered in a manner that is somewhat abrupt and out of context and intended to stun and amuse.
The Venthyr might just be related to the Nathrezim, or they could be a branch of the Nathrezim that somehow migrated to the Shadowlands long ago to live out their lives - but they may still be tied to the Twisting Nether as natural demons. Difficult to say, really, and we'll need more lore on them.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
They are a demon race - Chronicle I stated as much: "Among these greater demons were the nathrezim, otherwise known as dreadlords. Cunning and manipulative, they dedicated their existence to mastering the arts of shadow magic" (noted that shadow magic isn't Void magic, Chronicle specifically mentioned Void just few lines before that).
Kil'Jaeden is a demon. Demon isn't one singular race, a non-demon can turned into one with enough Fel - just like how lore-wise, Illidan is a half-demon now even though he was fully NE before.
But the Legion, even by now, aren't just Fel only. They use Arcane and Necromancy as well, perhaps even Void. That's a lot of magic (the only thing we haven't seen them using - IIRC - are just Nature / Holy, I guess?). They seem to be dominated by Fel-user, but certainly are far from just Fel only.
Last edited by Qualia; 2019-11-08 at 03:57 PM.
Je veux le sang, sang, sang, et sang
Donnons le sang de guillotine
Pour guerir la secheresse de la guillotine
Je veux le sang, sang, sang, et sang.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
I see no issue with them expanding lore when it comes to topics like this. Honest question since I haven't played it (waiting for Reforged), how was it shown/depicted in WC3? To me, it always seemed weird to me that the Legion outright created the Scourge simply because we really haven't seen them use any necromancy since. The only major example I can think of is Gul'dan at Blackrook Hold. I legitimately think its more interesting if the demons merely harnessed this power from somewhere else. To me, it doesn't invalidate the power of the legion, but it helps solidify the boundaries between the 6 major schools of magic.
At the end of the day, I am going into this expansion with an open mind. It will be nice to finally wrap up all of these different afterlife questions, such as Helya+valkyr and the resurrection of the ancients/loa. If the story ends up being trash like anything after 8.1 I will obviously call it out.
Someone with so much hate in their heart, cannot see the truth, even if it is right in front of them. You my friend, need to step away and realize this is just a game. To talk like that, and have a forum avatar that you no doubt made hating on a "game" with that kind of passion is kind of silly.
But on topic...Speaking of the Nathrezim... This is pulled from their wiki, I read it long ago when trying to learn more about Sargeras, but am citing it here for context. It is 100% possible, that they knew of the shadow realms, and a way to control the scourge after being basically enslaved for what appears to have been eons by old gods and the void lords who sent them. The entire purpose of Sargeras enslaving the demons was to fight against the old gods/ void lords, and what better weapon to do that than the undead, which they have no control over. And you're telling me he never knew of that? That the lich king was made just for kicks, or to provide a specific purpose?
One conclave of nathrezim dwelled on a world almost completely corrupted by the Old Gods, basking in their shadowy power, until the titan champion Sargeras discovered them. He ruthlessly interrogated the dreadlords, and it was from them that he learned of the Old Gods and the void lords. The dreadlords revealed that the void lords had sent the Old Gods out into the cosmos in order to find and corrupt a titan world-soul, transforming it into an unspeakably dark creature that not even the Pantheon could stand against. Enraged by this discovery, Sargeras killed the nathrezim and shattered the corrupted world upon which they dwelled.[15]
Now, I am not condoning the retcon-mania that Blizzard tries to go on, but sometimes there are ways of making things work, that we don't like. And if real world history has taught us anything, is that the winners get to write the history books. So its entirely possible that there is a very different version of how things happened and or were created before the Titans/Sargeras got their hands on them.
Except Sylvanas has such a huge fanbase that Blizzard will never dare make her the new Garrosh & Gul'dan (in the sense that she will die...soon). Both Garrosh and Gul'dan were nuisance for an expansion, and kicked the bucket at the start of the next expansion. If they were to do the same to her, then she needs to die and be gone in the first raid tier at the latest. Just...isn't going to happen really.
That's not really true, the fans are very important to the developers at Blizzard, but the story has to be told the way it's meant to be told. No author worth his or her salt is going to substantially change their story because of fan outcry over a specific character.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
imo, it would make sense to me for the nathrezim to have access to the shadowlands.
they were some of the greatest masters of all forms of magic in existence. necromancy is very much within their power to command, and getting into the shadowlands isn't exactly hard even for mortal necromancers, let alone demonic ones.
so nathrezim go to the shadowlands, maldraxxus specifically, and use their forges to make the helm and frostmourne, and they probably made apocalypse there too.