Page 13 of 14 FirstFirst ...
3
11
12
13
14
LastLast
  1. #241
    Moderator Aucald's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Epic Premium
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA-US
    Posts
    45,806
    Quote Originally Posted by HighlordJohnstone View Post
    Honestly doesn't matter. Blizzard would be extremely dumb to push for a Sylvanas "redemption arc". This expansion just screams setting up her downfall.
    Oh, I don't disagree with that at all. I'm just saying that Blizzard is going to tell the story they're going to tell, and both the fans of Sylvanas and her detractors don't have much say in it - it will be what it will be. But yes, I'm pretty confident she's being set up for a long (and, personally speaking, quite satisfying) fall.
    "We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

  2. #242
    Quote Originally Posted by HighlordJohnstone View Post
    Honestly doesn't matter. Blizzard would be extremely dumb to push for a Sylvanas "redemption arc". This expansion just screams setting up her downfall.
    Its gonna be redemption dude. Her motives arent world domination, her battle has always been for the shadowlands ever since she killed herself and realised something was wrong there and couldnt die in peace. She doesnt care for life or living. She will defeat her enemy in the shadowlands, 'free' everyones souls and then her job will be complete. Whether she dies afterward (very likely what she would want anywa) ' or is imprisoned (likely by tyrande) she wont care.
    Acting like death is punishment for someone who wanted to commit suicide is a little silly. Imprisonment and denying her death would be a significantly bigger punishment for her.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by derpkitteh View Post
    imo, it would make sense to me for the nathrezim to have access to the shadowlands.

    they were some of the greatest masters of all forms of magic in existence. necromancy is very much within their power to command, and getting into the shadowlands isn't exactly hard even for mortal necromancers, let alone demonic ones.

    so nathrezim go to the shadowlands, maldraxxus specifically, and use their forges to make the helm and frostmourne, and they probably made apocalypse there too.
    Its damn near all but confirmed that they could access the shadowlands. Most dreadlords we meet use necromantic magic instead of fel magic, they are incredibly well attuned to death magic and are vampiric by nature. I always thought the old explanation that 'kill jaedin and the dreadlords forged the most powerful death related artifacts in existence' was an insufficient explanation. What, was it forged in the nether? An area saturated in fel magic?

  3. #243
    "Her motives aren't world domination" Pretty sure Sylvanas wants to be a goddess of Death, and conquer everyone and everything, but okay.

  4. #244
    Quote Originally Posted by HighlordJohnstone View Post
    "Her motives aren't world domination" Pretty sure Sylvanas wants to be a goddess of Death, and conquer everyone and everything, but okay.
    She wants to dethrone the jailer so when she dies she can be at peace, and she is using us to do so.

    You can take that to the bank.

  5. #245
    Quote Originally Posted by Goldfingaz View Post
    She wants to dethrone the jailer so when she dies she can be at peace, and she is using us to do so.

    You can take that to the bank.
    He can't die then when she dethrones him. So no, the bank has nothing there.

  6. #246
    Quote Originally Posted by valky94 View Post
    how do you know that the nathrezim didnt go to the shadowlands to craft the helm of domination and frostmourne??
    because demons cant enter the shadowlands. unless blizzard changed their opinion about that matter aswell...

  7. #247
    Quote Originally Posted by HighlordJohnstone View Post
    He can't die then when she dethrones him. So no, the bank has nothing there.
    Take. It. To. The. Bank.

    Come on, you know he's going to be dethroned and a redeemed Arthas is going to take his place, don't you?

  8. #248
    Old God Kathranis's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    10,111
    Quote Originally Posted by Restors View Post
    because demons cant enter the shadowlands. unless blizzard changed their opinion about that matter aswell...
    Nothing says they can't enter it, they just don't go there when they die.

  9. #249
    Quote Originally Posted by Restors View Post
    because demons cant enter the shadowlands. unless blizzard changed their opinion about that matter aswell...
    just because demons dont go to the shadowlands when they die doesnt mean that they cant inflitrate it

  10. #250
    Quote Originally Posted by Goldfingaz View Post
    Take. It. To. The. Bank.

    Come on, you know he's going to be dethroned and a redeemed Arthas is going to take his place, don't you?
    He's the main villain of the Expansion. If anything, she'll be gone before him.

  11. #251
    Quote Originally Posted by Goldielocks View Post
    All necromancy comes from the Shadowlands. Its not significant. The entire point here is that they’re trying to paint the Lich King as unique when he’s not. He’s no different than a Dreadlord.
    Except that he was waaaaay better at it than any of the Dreadlords? Even the high ranking Scourge members in WC3 like Arthas and Kel'Thuzad made the Dreadlords look like amateurs when it came to Necromancy. They were outplayed and outsmarted by Arthas and Ner'Zhul on every occasion.

    Dreadlords, Necromancers, Liches and DKs all commanded parts of the Scourge, but the only one with the ability to control the entire Scourge was the LK. That's why he was unique.
    Last edited by ThrashMetalFtw; 2019-11-09 at 02:50 AM.
    They're (short for They are) describes a group of people. "They're/They are a nice bunch of guys." Their indicates that something belongs/is related to a group of people. "Their car was all out of fuel." There refers to a location. "Let's set up camp over there." There is also no such thing as "could/should OF". The correct way is: Could/should'VE, or could/should HAVE.
    Holyfury armory

  12. #252
    Admittedly I've been scratching my head with this one. I am excited to see how Blizzard works out the kinks in this one because I do think that as they begin to explain the story of this they're going to begin to unravel the more cosmic forces of the universe in Warcraft. I suspect we started to touch on this with the Remnant of Chaos that dropped in WoD with it being in the possession of Archimonde seeming to suggest that he had managed to travel to the Rift of Aln (and subsequently the Emerald Dream) and snag it. If Archimonde managed that journey, whose to say they couldn't also travel to places like the Shadowlands?

  13. #253
    Quote Originally Posted by Aucald View Post
    That's not really true, the fans are very important to the developers at Blizzard, but the story has to be told the way it's meant to be told. No author worth his or her salt is going to substantially change their story because of fan outcry over a specific character.
    I still believe the conspiracy theory that fan outcry made blizzard rethink the chandelier's prophecy about Illidan and killed her off instead.

  14. #254
    Quote Originally Posted by HighlordJohnstone View Post
    Okay, dude, you do realize that guys like Arthas have an even bigger fan base, yes? And yet he still died. Same thing with Gul'dan, and Azshara, and the Legion...

    Fan bases mean fuck all towards Blizzard.
    There's a difference between long established villains getting their end, and suddenly turning fanboy favourite faction leader of over a decade into a villain and killing it off. Not happening.

    As you might have noticed, they didn't even have the guts to kill Thrall off, despite it having been high time he's out of the picture for good since Cata.
    Last edited by Azadina; 2019-11-09 at 08:29 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jtbrig7390 View Post
    True, I was just bored and tired but you are correct.

    Last edited by Thwart; Today at 05:21 PM. Reason: Infracted for flaming
    Quote Originally Posted by epigramx View Post
    millennials were the kids of the 9/11 survivors.

  15. #255
    Quote Originally Posted by InfiniteCharger View Post
    Because it makes no sense for forces of death (ie. benevolent forces of nature) to work with demons to use "death magic" to interrupt the natural flow. That contradicts all common sense. It also contradicts the Nathrezim being demons from the twisting nether.

    It also contradicts the point of Nerzhul being sent to Azeroth to kill all the living not be a "jailer" of the damned as part of some grand scheme with death.

    Not only that it contradicts the undead and the scourge as abominations throwing off the balance of nature and death.
    Nope. All of that is thrown out the window with Sylvanas making a deal with death that basically allows her undead corpse to keep living.
    Because by all rights any force of death should immediately snatch her soul to the shadowlands where she belongs.
    But not going to happen because apparently death is ok with necromatic death magic keeping souls of the dead in the world of the living.
    This is the "grand scheme" to be revealed in the upcoming xpac.
    You must really get your panties twisted into knots when we find real world examples of our actual history being "retconned" just because we got new information that presents past events in a different light


    hows it like living with your head shoved so far up your ass that new information is always a bad thing to gain?
    Never believe you have seen the peak of human stupidity and ignorance, or you will constantly be surprised by the new levels the reach almost every day

  16. #256
    Considering some Nathrezim were masters of shadow magic and even aligned themselves with the Old Gods back when Sargeras was a goodboi. I don't see why they wouldn't have access to the Shadowlands.

  17. #257
    So, how does this actually change the original story behind the items? Or is just more story into deeper to the lore?

    Why all the fuzz?
    Last edited by Matiketope; 2019-11-09 at 09:59 AM.

  18. #258
    Legendary!
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    6,380
    Quote Originally Posted by Fistfighter View Post
    That's not really retcon, right. Kil'jaden just pulled them from the Shadowlands, effectively "creating them" on the normal realm.
    Anything that so much as touches upon or adds details to existing lore is a retcon in this community.

  19. #259
    There's a phrase you need to learn and take to heart. If you are familiar with warhammer, you might already know it:

    "Everything is canon. Not everything is true."

    There are no retcons, just different accounts of different people. All the lore you read is in-universe propaganda, shaped by different parties to suit their needs.

  20. #260
    Quote Originally Posted by InfiniteCharger View Post
    It also contradicts the Nathrezim being demons from the twisting nether.
    The Nathrezim are a race older than Sargeras himself.
    So imagine this scenarii : The Nathrezim where the denizen of the Shadowlands, or the Nathrezim were once a mortal race that became a big shot in the ventyr covenant once they were dead. Hell, even the actual leader of the ventyr got a nathrezim sounding name ' Denathrius '
    they lived in nathreza and became corrupted by the Fel Magic and became demons. Thus closing their doorway to the shadowlands forever. thus, we now have the nathrezim demons race that Sargeras encountered after. ( The eredars were mortals too before )

    See ? that works and nothing is retconned.

    Quote Originally Posted by InfiniteCharger View Post
    It also contradicts the point of Nerzhul being sent to Azeroth to kill all the living not be a "jailer" of the damned as part of some grand scheme with death.
    Nerzhul was not sent to Azeroth to " kill all the livng ". It was sent there as a pawn for the Legion when the Legion will need him, and served exactly that purpose. Until he rebelled . What we dont know so far is if there was a " catch " from the power the legion borrowed in the shadowlands. They may even have made a Bargain with the jailer that wasn't dealt with, and it would explain why the machine of death broke during Legion when the BL returned to Azeroth.

    The only " retcon " as of now is Sylvanas's encounter with the jailer and her goal that changed on the fly despite her thinking otherwise in the books...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •