Originally Posted by
Nerovar
Wow, that's just so silly I don't even know where to begin.
First of all, I never mentioned Arthas or Bolvar in my original post because the distinction is not really important for the point I was making. Sure, Arthas a probably stronger than Bolvar but that's not relevant since we're still talking about the Lich King.
How was Arthas character developed off-screen? We literally saw him do everything he did - fighting the plague, culling of Stratholme, obtaining Frostmourne and killing Mal'ganis, his father etc. and finally becoming the Lich King.
Bolvar was the regent of Stormwind for more than one expansion and while his character wasn't really developed much, the Crown of Domination and the Lich King were well-established at the end of WotLK. It doesn't matter that Bolvar isn't the most fleshed-out character because he became the Lich King who is a pretty big character (and we all know how he got his powers)
Sure, Sylvanas' character reaches back into WC3 and she had a pretty fair share of character development but (and that's the big point) she was never developed as a particularly powerful character. That's the difference. We know the Lich King is powerful. It is established in the lore. Sylvanas is (or was) just a very intelligent (not even particularly powerful) banshee who's good with the bow.
The only thing that made her powerfull is an off-screen pact that happened at the end of WotLK made with a being that didn't exist back then. That's the lazy part.