"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Thank you. People looking for diversity in goblins are looking for it in the wrong race. A noble goblin is a gnome painted green with pointed ears and messed up teeth. I mean, of course the Trade Princes can vary in personalities, but greed should be part of all. It's a defining personality trait.
- - - Updated - - -
Essentially, this is how the Trade Princes should be presented.
Scum bags, all of them, motivated by the same thing, but different character quirks and traits.
BTW the mountain with the palace. They moved it. It used to be further south, where the strip mine currently is. They. Moved. A. Mountain. Suppose it costed a ton.
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Trade_prince
also some one needs to be called danny if we do this!
- - - Updated - - -
This is what bothers me the most, if they want to make him cool atleast start with hes model and make him wear stuff people want. Then you get peoples attention, but instead he looks like a generic goblin with level 5 gear on.
Problem with this assessment is your only regarding such characters in over the top ways, which gallywix is, and over the top greedy asshole who's more of a stereotype then a character. Think like if you need a perfect silhouette to discribe greedy bastard, gallywix is just that.
But you don't need over the top stereotypes to make characters into prominent roles, if anything it's better they aren't because they can be given more depth of character rather then trying to uphold a cardboard standup of a personally.
That's the really difference between the two, ones a cartoon character, the others an actual character.
I hope they will build royal university of lawful good in its place.
You can replace Gazlowe with another neutral faction leader, and the examples you use would just imply no intent to control the cartel. That's essentially saying Calia, for existing, and interacted with Forsaken Priests in an Order Hall, should lead the Forsaken since yesterday under the notion of simply being a Menethil. I am okay with the whole Gazlowe leading Bilgewater, he has the history. But history doesn't mean sense.
All of his motions weren't made to drive his motives toward the Horde at all, his story is written as the foil to Gallywix's current actions being intentionally shady.
There is a such a thing as telling a story the player needs to know. Makes sudden story changes more palatable. If we didn't need to know what could be going on with that, then there wasn't a reason to have the dialogues we do have from others leaders foreshadowing other events. They're there for a reason, and my only gripe is Gazlowe is currently neutral, with no plans to suddenly side with the Horde.
He probably shouldn't have sided with the one who's aim is to kill everyone and suck their souls into eternal damnation then. When you think of it, him siding with her makes no sense whatsoever, unless he's convinced she could destroy all life and thinks his own survival depends on being on her good side more then profit.