Originally Posted by
Syegfryed
did blood elves became friends with the orcs from day to night? right after the second war? or some big major things happens before, things like the almost execution of their race and the betrayal of their former allies?
just one exception don't make a rule, much time and lore should pass to centaurs and taurens lose their hatred and start to forging something, is not something done in a week
I should have said allies instead of friends.. if that's your only objection, then take my reply as the words "friends" being swapped with allies. Appropriately, blizzard added lore to explain the situation, is it so hard to believe the same can't happen with Centaurs? The lore isn't currently there, but when the event happens, the lore is introduced to help make sense to the player why this is happening.
Originally Posted by
Syegfryed
your arguments are just deflecting and false equivalence, i will not be proven wrong by that, if you come with actual arguments i can take it, i do know humility, something elves and elf players don't
You keep saying that, yet you are the one deflecting, just like above, rather than interpret friends for the context iI was actually using it as (which was allies), you picked on the term friends, as if to say because they aren't friends (in the conventional most recognised meaning of the word) then what I said wasn't valid at all when it really isn't what I said.
And you keep using false equivalence as some sort of vindication of your point where really that's not the point of the exercise, this is a what if topic, lore parallesl are being drawn, and used to explain new concepts and ideas, people aren't going to get exact equivalences, or the perfect equivalence, there points aren't invalid because it isn't a perfect equivalence, that doesn't need to happen, just try and see what information they are trying to convey in the way they are trying to convey it. I know it is not always easy because we are not always precise, and some of us are not as intelligent as you or perfectly correct /astute. Please be understanding of this, and adjust your perspective for the benefit of corporation, less stress and you know friendship as we kinda all share the same love.
If I may offer some counsel? Sometimes you're right, especially if we were being precise to the issue the equivalence was entirely about, but if the analogies aren't 100% correct, doesn't mean the persons whole argument or point is now invalid and therefore incorrect. You don't have to be right all the time.. you may have been trained that way (I know some academic circles do like to focus people with that mindset, some families too create that environment), especially competitive ones. It doesn't have to be that way, it's not always about winning the argument or point, at least not here.