That or "Useful Idiot"
Someone who is too much of an idiot to understand that they are only being used in short term because it's convenient. Not actually accepted as one of whomever they are pandering to, because they are still despised the same as before, and will be discarded as such the moment their usefulness has run it's course.
The minority of jews pandering to nazis is a great example of what happens when pandering to people who hate you, especially if they gain power such as nazis did.
Last edited by Dacien; 2020-01-18 at 08:00 PM.
I wonder how it would go if you didn't see the face or even the party people were with and just had issues talked about and how they would deal with them. Not just a political bias, we just voted on the issues and how "person x,y,z" has a stance on those issues
I feel many people would be switching sides both ways without even realizing it lol
Isn't this pretty much a textbook definition of what happens on the left when one of their own disagrees with their doctrine?
Immediately thrown under the bus?
- - - Updated - - -
Pretty much. Hipocrisy and convenience runs deep in the party.
I dunno, the guy that Trump called, and I directly quote, "my African American," left the republican party on his own volition.
People don't accuse the republican party of being racist simply because they don't have non-white people in them. They call them racist because of the racist things they do, racist things they say (see above!) and the racist people they court.
Is your understanding of criticisms of the your party that fundamentally lacking? I know the republican party was never one to be introspective, but... yeesh.
As for minority people opting to be part of the Republican party, well... people of any demographic can be short-sighted and mistakenly believe the republican party still stands for anything resembling an economic or moral position. Any sane person would realize that the blank-check tax payer funded government projects and ballooning deficits helmed by a thrice-married, prostitute-fucking, draft dodging trustfund baby all whole-heartedly condoned by the Republican party means all of those things went out the window long ago.
Last edited by Kaleredar; 2020-01-19 at 06:01 AM.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
As opposed to the racist thing they do, the racist things they say, and the racist people the dems court?
Have you considered the possibility that maybe the reason they're joining the party is neither short-sightedness nor mistaken belief but actual, valid reasons and that the republican party does stand for valid economic and moral positions?
In other words, do you accept the possibility that it's not them being wrong... but you?
That misses the mark, though.
The hypocrisy in that post was not about this person being part of the GOP in any way. It was about her being propped up as a "Muslim" challenger first and foremost. If you look at her coverage, that is what even right wing media focuses on - the very kind that tends to decry identity politics. Just look at how the other contenders are described in the article from the OP. "Businessman", "activist", etc. They get their job titles as codifiers. But what is the first thing it tells us about al-Aqidi? That she is a Muslim refugee. It's what they focus on, what they want you to know about her. That is using her religious/ethnic background not just to sell her, but also to make a point. Hence the hypocrisy allegation. It's not about a Muslim running. It is about how that Muslim running is being treated.
If it was just happening and the media was just business as usual, it would be dandy, as it should be. But since there is coverage focusing on her background - and even threads created here, which we haven't seen many of for Omar's other challengers - yeah, I can see why people would call it out.
People leave the left all the time but usually go independent because simply the republican party is just way too far on the opposite side of the spectrum for it to be appealing. The people that make the switch do so openly usually con men who are trying to milk the right wing because it feeds the narrative they desperately want. The old GOP switching made sense family values, conservative spending, small government, free market solutions to environmental problems, immigration reform. the GOP of today represented by a porn star banging three times married man who is running the biggest deficit in history while talking about destroying the environment and how vaccines are horrible is a bridge too far for a switch to be believable.