But he didn't do that while under oath. I can say I know @Breccia is banging Lindsey Graham's wife in the shower. Put me under oath though, and I'll admit I heard some people say it. Lots of people. Many people. You know, people.
But he didn't do that while under oath. I can say I know @Breccia is banging Lindsey Graham's wife in the shower. Put me under oath though, and I'll admit I heard some people say it. Lots of people. Many people. You know, people.
Aww, yeah, you know that's right, baby.
Since I freed up his time, Graham did make room to talk about summarily dismissing all charges without hearing evidence.
Yeah...if Graham says that, others are ready to back that play. Looks like Trump gets his day in "court" just what he wanted.That’s dead for practical purposes. There are a lot of senators who I think will wind up acquitting the president but believe we need to hear the House’s case [and] the president’s case in answer to the House’s case.
EDIT: Oh shit, forgot to mention, he said it on FOX News. No mistaking that message.
In a fair world? Politicians would be subjected to consequences almost as bad as say, murderers. But this is a world where they make the rules and to hell with the consequences for being dishonest. Probably one of my favorite renditions of justice being done to government was in a Dr. McNinja comic where a bad guy blew up most of the politicians in the U.S. and pretty much everyone clapped.
I used the word potentially in an attempt to convince myself things aren't actually as bad as they are. Sadly they are worse.
- - - Updated - - -
Trump has too many supporters in the Senate for his removal to ever be a risk. Which is a good reason to start voting all of these senators out of office starting with moscow mitch.
- - - Updated - - -
Sadly no. Truth and ethics have little to do with what is going on in the Senate.
This is all a moot point. No one thought they would likely vote to convict. He should be convicted but that isn't my point. My point is that Senators are going to have to take a stand. If they vote to dismiss. Like it or not they will have to justify that vote to there constituents. That is the whole point here. Ultimately Senators like Collins, Gardner, Mcsally etc are going to have to justify why they voted to dismiss on something that is beyond what Nixon did.
Beyond what Nixon did? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Thanks for the laugh. This thread makes me kinda smirk and almost laugh because it's just bitching ignoring the fact that he will not be removed. It's page after page of liberal democratic party wet dreams and whining about shit that doesn't matter. But this made me actually laugh. I want you guys to seriously come up with a list of 67 senators who would vote for removal. Until you can actually come up with 67 senators, this thread is just a giant bloviating whining circle jerk of nothing.
On an even more laughable note, Schumer has decided he is going to make them vote on him getting witnesses because after a partisan house impeachment, he thinks 4 Republicans will break in the senate and help him get his wish.
Such a rousing argument, I bet all 100 senators will vote for his witnesses now."And it will be up to four Republicans to side with the Constitution, to side with our Democracy, to side with rule of law," Schumer told reporters. "And not side, in blind obeisance, to President Trump and his desire to suppress the truth. Because in my judgment, he probably thinks he's guilty."
My favorite quote of the weekend:
[Infraction]“Nancy Pelosi is going out on TV crowing that the president has been impeached forever.” “Well, when we get to final judgment, the president will have been acquitted forever of these bogus impeachment charges. That’s a much better outcome for the president and for the country.”
Last edited by Rozz; 2020-01-20 at 03:08 PM. Reason: Minor Trolling
Note how this post actually doesn't dispute that what Trump did what he's accused of or that it's bad, merely that there aren't enough Republicans who would vote for removal.
I'm surprised you'd be crowing for the acquittal of someone who called the US military 'losers'.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Sorry if you are having trouble comprehending my point. I know its difficult to fathom when someone types in that they know an conviction isn't possible with the likes of enablers like yourself who refuse to understand how bribery works. But aside from that. I had no expectation of him ever being found guilty with the quality of senators on the republican side that we currently have. I know its difficult to say a+b=c or 1+1=2 to some people so let me elucidate my point.
I could rehash the arguments but your whole argument is just to start again into doing the standard fud and whataboutism and I am not going to bother. Because that was never my point. I dare you to find anywhere in my statement where this was my main point. Oh I believe he is guilty. But most of us aren't under the delusion that Republicans will do the right thing. But my point instead is to let the electorate ultimately make the decision in November after being presented the information and watching Republican Senators and Congressman having to actually justify there vote in front of the electorate. Which is fine with me. And should be by you as well giving your obvious belief in his innocence. I have a high expectation from people based on last years midterms to how that will likely turn out. Ultimately your whole point is about something I never said. Which I am sorry if you had difficulty understanding. But you as a Trump supporter it doesn't surprise me. I think you will agree with me however that no matter what happens people like yourself will have to find some way to convince voters in the state like Colorado, Arizona, Maine, Michigan etc that Trump is innocent. Shouldn't be too hard to do after what happened with the last election.
Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866
They whined all of Obama's presidency that he broke the law, but couldn't cite anything that was tied to Obama. But when Trump actually breaks something that is explicitly stated in the constitution, we should ignore it, and in some cases like Kokolums wants, we should give Trump and the Republicans everything because they are hold this country hostage and they want us to "negotiate" with the terrorists.
Notice fine internet people how he isn't defending what trump did. Lately the argument seems to be "well he's not getting removed so nyeh!"
So let me ask you this, and this is open to any trump supporter, are you ok with Trump asking a foreign nation outside of the appropriate channels to announce an investigation into a potential rival in the upcoming elections. Remember he asked in live TV for China to do it as well