Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst
1
2
3
  1. #41
    Stood in the Fire Uvania's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    477
    BFA is bad since its a lesser version of legion and legion was a breath of fresh air after WoD

    BFA failed much cause of the faction imbalance that has been going on the past years in WoW, one solution is simply to dump "horde vs alliance" and give us mixed random pvp content such as random bgs and skirmish arenas between factions.

    It didnt help that much of the funsies we had with artifact weapons and legendarys were replaced by the most boring progression system to date and i find corruption gear even worse, why cant we look back at for example TBC and WOTLK and how the items looked back then?

    and my rankings are following from worst to best.

    Bfa
    WoD
    MoP
    Cata
    Legion
    Vanilla
    TBC
    Wotlk

  2. #42
    Well BfA isn't over, and so far BC and Cataclysm were objectively worse.

    Probably better than WoD - and as good as Legion.

    Not a fanboi - just judge things on merits rather than parroting what YT videos say.

    Challenge Mode : Play WoW like my disability has me play:
    You will need two people, Brian MUST use the mouse for movement/looking and John MUST use the keyboard for casting, attacking, healing etc.
    Briand and John share the same goal, same intentions - but they can't talk to each other, however they can react to each other's in game activities.
    Now see how far Brian and John get in WoW.


  3. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by schwarzkopf View Post
    Well BfA isn't over, and so far BC and Cataclysm were objectively worse.
    By objectively you mean subjectively.

    TBC is the best expansion ever, maybe only beaten by Legion, maybe. In my humble objective, eh I mean subjective opinion.

  4. #44
    Moderator Aucald's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Epic Premium
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA-US
    Posts
    45,827
    A less leading and bating version of this thread already exists here, there's no real need for another. Closing this.
    "We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •