Did anyone contacted Blizzard or send feedback???
Love it!
Hate it!
Graphics are the only thing that is truly good. Props to that Malaysian studio.
Everything else is what we have problems with. But let's add animations to the graphics, because those are jarring and are screwing up the new shiny models.
It was clearly a remaster the moment they mentioned that it would be compatible with Warcraft 3 classic, and will be using that same engine, if it were a remake it would have used a different, new engine.
- - - Updated - - -
I mean, it kinda is, they didn't just put 4k textures on the existing models to be a remaster, they completely changed every single asset. They remade some maps (at least stratholme, that's how far I've gotten, could be the only one).
And I'm not defending them at all, I'm pissed that they didn't keep their promise about the cinematics, that I can't play custom campaigns and that they removed the ability to play the old client and removed all those MP features (even if I don't really play MP).
But it was still worth the 40$ for me, cause all I needed from it was better graphics, and it very much delivered.
also, outside of some cutscenes I have no issues with performance in 4k resolution on a GTX 1080.
Last edited by Skorpionss; 2020-01-31 at 12:26 AM.
I swear, old Warcraft graphics (visual) looks way more satisfying and good than Reforged one.
Reforged lighting system, blurred textures and somehow mishandled models creates that "shitty 2002 Warcraft RTS clone game" look. Even UI in the starting window looks somehow blurred and shitty.
Youre right, but why is it still $30 for a texture pack? Why are they still advertising cut features on https://playwarcraft3.com/en-us/?
- - - Updated - - -
They say they did, but they have the same animations as original, yet they are advertising that they are new.
They are absolutely new, even lip syncing for the portraits is there. Yeah the combat animations are the same, that's probably an engine limitation, or a balancing limitation since increasing animation frames would impact not only performance, rendering reforged users at a disadvantage over classic users, but also might be some weird balancing issue with animation cancelling and shit which I don't know much about since I don't play competitively.
You really have to wonder if the people defending bullshit like this are paid to do it. If you aren't paid then what compels you to defend shit like this? I would genuinely like to know.
I'll be getting a refund on this shit. The fucking cunts don't deserve my money.
They denied a refund of a fellow Australian(as per the subreddit) until he wrote them an email detailing Australian Consumer Law. Fucking disgraceful.
Right now, theyre advertising new remodled characters and animations https://playwarcraft3.com/en-us/. Theyre lying to people and charging them $30 for a texture pack.
"Integrating cutting-edge modeling and rendering, we’ve rebuilt every hero, unit, building, and environment in Warcraft III from the ground up. You’ve never seen Azeroth like this."
This a complete lie.