Wanting to “make examples” out of people does not work. We have the data on it and we have studies in that very issue. So if your sentencing is based on wanting to “make an example” your entire argument is already discredited by decades of research.
Soft on crime? No sensible on crime.
I don’t get Americans hard on for ramming vengeance down everyone’s throat for their own sick pleasure. It’s stupid and leaves us with a high percentage in prison and a high percentage who enter a never ending cycle.
Other countries don’t have this problem.
- - - Updated - - -
You weren’t in his head.
He clearly has some issue mentally. What if in his head he wanted to bring attention to the growing concern from the right. The side that the fbi has as an equal threat to Isis go American lives.
Do you know that is not the case?
Yes it does
Soft on crime? No sensible on crime.
I don’t get Americans hard on for ramming vengeance down everyone’s throat for their own sick pleasure. It’s stupid and leaves us with a high percentage in prison and a high percentage who enter a never ending cycle.
When someone was willing to destroy 2 innocent lives and you say, "just make him pick up some trash" Yeah you're soft of crime.
https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/...out-deterrence
4. Increasing the severity of punishment does little to deter crime.
Laws and policies designed to deter crime by focusing mainly on increasing the severity of punishment are ineffective partly because criminals know little about the sanctions for specific crimes.
More severe punishments do not “chasten” individuals convicted of crimes, and prisons may exacerbate recidivism.
But what does the government agency who is tasked with research into crime and justice suppose to know? National institute of justice? Pfft no we have Zenkai!!!
And who cares about recidivism right? As long as people can get their revenge boner dealt with nothing else matters.
What two individuals? The two he paid to act out the whole bit?
Last edited by Themius; 2020-02-13 at 01:25 PM.
The opinion OF AN AGENCY RESEARCHING THIS ISSUE
you have a reasoning problem. At the top of the very link
Did you see “summarises large body of research” and come to the conclusion “opinion piece based on nothing”
NIJ’s “Five Things About Deterrence” summarizes a large body of research related to deterrence of crime into five points.
How?! How does that work? Most normal people wouldn’t do that but when you’re constantly arguing in bad faith I guess you just ignore how language works.
And then furthermore they have fucking sources you can go to on top of it. Your side has a thing for purposeful ignorance. It’s there... just read it “nope I close my eyes and lalala “
Daniel S. Nagin succinctly summarized the current state of theory and empirical knowledge about deterrence. The information in this publication is drawn from Nagin’s essay with additional context provided by NIJ and is presented here to help those who make policies and laws that are based on science.
Last edited by Themius; 2020-02-13 at 01:33 PM.
Yeah, a biased agency with an opnion
I guess we shouldn't punish murders since punishment won't deter them? Nice life philosophy.
I don't speed because I don't want to be punished with a ticket. I guess deterrence don't work
I didn't walk out with a stereo from a store when I was poor because I didn't want to go to jail, I guess deterrence doesn't work.
Biased agency? You have proof of that or because you don’t agree they must be biased? Studies are biased too? Data and facts are biased too? You mean to tell me the ENTIRE agency is a deep state democrat cover for..... what?
Where did anyone say “don’t punish” the argument is simple. “Making examples out of people doesn’t work... they should be punished in line with their crime”. You twist that to “you want to let all the prisoners out”
Bad faith posting.
At thus point, they should make an example out of him, give him a harsh punishment for he have done id say a lot of damage.
For future cases there will always be that hint of doubt, and it will make those cases that bit harder to prove when its an actual hatecrime that has been committed.
PROUD TRUMP SUPPORTER, #2024Trump #MAGA
PROUD TRUMP CAMPAIGN SUPPORTER #SaveEuropeWithTrump
PROUD SUPPORTER OF THE WALL
BLUE LIVES MATTER
NO TO ALL GUNCONTROL OR BACKGROUND CHECKS IN EUROPE
/s
It isn’t. my point it there can be 3-4 viable reasons. You picking one and running with it is equally fantasy.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah no I literally just posted the stance of the national institute of justice Agency complete with sources who does research in this exact area and many others. But hey you people don’t care about data facts and science.
I hope he gets ****ed. Proper ****ed!
Absolute ***ting piece of s***!!!
Dispicable human being.
Have you not studied the case at all? Seems pointless to argue since you just want to defend him. He wanted it to be as racially charged as possible. 2 white dudes in MAGA hats using racist slurs, a noose and bleach. Keeps lying even after he gets exposed. Come on son. COME OOOON SON.
Even if they find him guilty on everything. He wont get more than 1.5 years, and even then, he will be out in 7 to 10 months because his crime was non violent.
Whats going to hurt ol Juicy Smoolay is the money he has to pay when this is all over. Hope he saved up some of that Empire money.