Yes and my point is, since while never knew why he suddenly changed his mind and didn't want to kill his brother and Tyrande anymore, when at one point he was going to in exchange for power, even before the book, we just always thought he was being crazy and inconsistent. I know they probably came up with much of his reasons much later than in WC3 or even later than the War of the Ancients novel, but the reasons given make his whole schtick with being on one side and then suddenly the other make sense. It's explained perfectly and fits him and his characterization up to that point perfectly. His characterization was allowed to completely remain the same, only reasons were given for things that before made little to no sense.
So to me, nothing has changed. Context was added, but nothing was changed about Illidan or his characterization. Sulking entitled emo brat with bad communication abilities remained sulking entitled emo brat with bad communication abilities. And love for his brother and Tyrande. Though I do guess this isn't going to be the case or play a role the next time we see him.
In TBC he was almost not portrayed at all. He imprisoned Maiev at some point before we arrived and did the thing with Akama and the other Broken, also way before we ever got there, then he started teaching and producing new Demonhunters, also from way before we arrived on the scene. Same goes for Magtheridon and the new Fel-orcs (even back then shown as affiliated with Illidan and strangely not with the Legion or even beholden to Magtheridon after drinking his blood. This at the time raised some questions)
We saw him show up once in the Netherwing questline and that was it until we fought him directly.
All we got back in TBC was second hand information and no background.
I mean, yes, the information we got in Legion was new, but it fit the story and nothing was actually changed, apart from there being information at all. To me that is not exactly a bad thing, it's more of a plus.
Yes, he had the orcs drink Magtheridon's blood is what I meant
And well his plan for 10k years was fighting the Legion and the thing that we got told in the book was that he realized that the Legion could not be fought with normal means. Then he kind of made up his mind as he went along, was my impression. Not that he had this pre-formed plan and just set it in motion when he got out. He didn't even know half the things he needed to know for the plan we read about in the book.
And fighting the Legion is not a new plan, not even for the rest of the Nightelves. That was what they intended to do all those 10k years long. The long vigil was exactly that.
The biggest issue with BFA's story is that it focused too much on what's coming up NEXT rather than dealing with what's going on NOW. This whole expansion was a build up to Sylvanas becoming the villain in the next expansion, and it merely glossed over what we had this expansion, notably Azshara and N'zoth. Even the finale scenes of this xpac are characters dealing with the after-effects of Sylvanas throughout BFA and not the bigger issue we (should) have had with N'zoth. I don't hate Sylvanas and I'm actually more excited to see her in her new role next expansion than when she was Warchief of the Horde, but it should have been an appetizer here in BFA, not the full course meal.
it begin in Cata when Ghostcrawler said that they always struggled with lore vs gameplay, and Cata they decided to just f8ck lore and go full out for gameplay
prior to that they still gave a f8ck about lore, gameplay still f8cked lore in some aspects but they still were thinking about lore, from cata forward if idea is cool do it, then twist lore and bend it to fit the idea
The beginning of wisdom is the statement 'I do not know.' The person who cannot make that statement is one who will never learn anything. And I have prided myself on my ability to learn
Thrall
http://youtu.be/x3ejO7Nssj8 7:20+ "Alliance remaining super power", clearly blizz favor horde too much, that they made alliance the super power
Thank you for reminding me just how bad the plot lines of this game are.
Indeed. Arthas was still using the Light when he was slaughtering innocents in Stratholme (with a reason, but still) or forcing his men to aid him in his personal quest for vengeance against Mal'ganis. The Scarlet Crusade in vanilla was a group of zealots so fanatical they killed everyone who wasn't them, other humans included, while being controlled by a Dreadlord, and they still used the Light just fine. The idea that Blizzard made the Light just as bad as the Void or Fel because X'era exists is nonsense, she's not even close to the worst Light user we've seen.
As for the topic, @Yarathir sums it up quite well. The narrative is a bunch of "twists" and "shocking" moments tied together by a loose thread. I just don't think this is new, even back in WC3 there was some of that, but they really kicked it into overdrive in WoW and especially BFA.
Yes, if you take all of the development away, sure, then you have a completely undeveloped character with no goals, no plan and just some more or less stupid voice-lines. That's not what I would call good lore, though and that's why I'm arguing for development, adding context and explaining reasons later on. It's about 'where did it start to go wrong' and I personally think you can't exactly pinpoint that, because there were good things added in the lore for some people after WC3 (in my opinion Illidan being one of those) and bad things being added after WC3 (I was really not ok with a two faction system with the Nightelves going Alliance and the Forsaken going Horde when they announced that's what would happen... in Alpha or Beta stage of WoW, I can't quite remember^^).
Although I know quite a few people that do not like new lore being added to existing stuff in general, I myself like it, as long as it doesn't actually change the deeper meaning of any given thing or the role a person essentially played. Like the example of Illidan. Yea, added context, plans, whatnot, but none of his actions changed, none of his actual characterization changed and the story remained essentially the same. We only had a nutty naaru screaming into our ears that the events were somehow different than what it actually showed us. But that's not changing the story, that is just someone being delusional or lying about something.