More than just people can be prestigious. Items and things can be prestigious..
- - - Updated - - -
Of course it can lol
Ill post this again bc you ignored it: So you couldnt describe Niagara Falls as prestigious, but Mount Rushmore could be? Youre definition is way to narrow. You cant chisel the definition to fit an argument youre trying to win...
Im done trying to teach you guys English. Go back to school, or open google.
Since you like linking definitions, does this one help at all? It even speaks of the words roots, and strangely, not a word about "items" or "things"?
prestigious
Eagle Scout is a prestigious position within the Boy Scouts. It requires a lot of hard work over a number of years, and if you become one, lots of people will respect you.
The adjective prestigious has a really wonderful Latin root, praestigiae, which means "conjuring tricks." Think of the magic word, "Presto!" Even though today's prestigious doesn't necessarily mean that the person described can do magic, imagining prestigious people as magicians can help you remember the admiration and status that the word implies.
We can argue definitions all we want, but we can all agree that there is nothing prestigious or rate about a freaking Ironfoe. It was crap in Vanilla and it is still crap in Classic.
Why are people so fixated on this shit. What does it matter.
Seriously, it feels like every other day I see a "classic is beating retail" post with just anecdotal garbage as proof. Ignoring little details like retail having a phasing system to intentionally prevent congestion of any one area.
I'm not saying OP is wrong but I really just don't see what the point is. Why are classic players dragging out this pissing contest? As someone currently playing neither it just makes me feel like two sides of a sinking ship, laughing that the other side is taking on more water.
This thread is filled with anecdotal evidence.
No one here knows the numbers.
"I feel bad for Limit , they put in so many hours only to come in second place" - Methodjosh
Last edited by Daymanmb; 2020-02-18 at 03:37 AM.
It seems that this is exactly what he did. All youve done is cry "yOu CaNT dO tHaT". Looks like he is winning this internet argument.
- - - Updated - - -
Reliable sources please. Not rando websites. Try again.
- - - Updated - - -
If you mean quoting definitions from the English language dictionary equivalent of the short bus, sure. I got rekt. Judging from your grammar and spelling I shouldn't be surprised.
Im not going to respond to your argumentum ad hominem. Rather than attack the source, try refuting the claim. You asked for a definition where it states, prestigious can be having high status. There you go, prove it wrong.
- - - Updated - - -
What was radically changed?
Last edited by Daymanmb; 2020-02-18 at 04:13 AM.
No, classic is not more popular than retail.
No, blizzard deciding to advertise classic does not objectively prove it's more popular. You're reaching HARD if you're going to assume that counts as proof of anything.
I won't even bother reading the rest of the thread but the OP's first post, because I know it's 99% going to be pointless back-and-forth drivel and bickering that amounts to a grand total of absolutely nothing.
Mostly the way loot works. Instead of grinding one dungeon endlessly at the same difficulty for your BiS item there's multiple dungeons that give roughly equal options. In classic there are items that are literally under 1% drop rate out of dungeons that are BiS for certain classes, that type of thing would never happen in retail because they realized it's an absolutely terrible design.
The other biggest change would be end game of classic is basically "do the exact same dungeon hundreds of times" while in retail with m+ the dungeons vary quite a bit from week to week or even key to key depending on difficulty.