If you paid attention to the media January/Feb. they said it was a mild flu that could lead to ARDS. Most said to go about daily habits and to worry about other things. Some even, held massive parties (see quoted link) in literal defiance of Covid-19. The media hyped the defiance up until shit went south REAL fast in Washington and NY. It's not poorly thought out. Retards who slurp down corporate fed biased bullshit meant to appease them rather than educate and notify them deserve most of this blame. Everything has to be an op-ed or have a slant. Sooooo no, not poorly thought out. Maybe this will clear up the gene pool, or atleast make people think twice about taking what the MSM says at face value
You are throwing everyone on one big heap and getting confused in the process or your sources of information are more concerned in victimizing and being apologetic for donald.
China was not left off the hook, neither is the WHO. However both those have taken a back seat as European politicians are pre-occupied with managing the national health and economic crisis.
The US is being blamed in cases where it is taking resources already paid or so the story goes but these stories don't take the front seat either when it comes to daily news. The US is being looked at with disbelieve as everything that has taken place elsewhere so far it is greatly being ignored, it doesn't help that a certain media outlet is showing ignorance and spreading misinformation.
Finally donald is being blamed because he has acted poorly and continues to do so, he is constantly trying to undermine medical expert advices by putting economic interests beforehand and is promoting a drug that can be lethal as a cure.
Priorities have to be made, blame China and the WHO all you want but right now the person causing for troubles is donald. Unless you wish to claim that China and the WHO is running the US government and press conferences that are originally intended to inform the people about the COVID19 crisis and aren't suppose to be in poor taste election rallies
Check out my drones guide!
Per ICNARC estimates, BoJo has a 50/50 shot of making it.
https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/sta...52077513977857
It is a shame that every nation has had to go throw the same cycle, some places did warn us as for the actual time line in the US i am unaware as i was more focussed on national matters than those far away.
As for the public response, your government is actually the first line of information in these kind of situation and they were actually the last ones to be on board. The government in the US plays an especially important role because they have the information agencies behind them to back this up and apparently it was know since december 2019, also the US media landscape is politically divided.
I have to also confirm that even here in Belgium where we took it serious a whole lot sooner at the start of March, when a lockdown was announced and all bars, pubs and so forth were to be closed at friday night people held Corona parties, people greatly underestimated it everywhere. So again it is not the media task especially in such a divided landscape as the US to be the first line of information.
Sadly that first line of information that are the press conferences are still not presenting a clear and united message, it is mostly donald trying to shift his own incompetence on everything but himself.
However, i don't understand your anger on this especially when looking at you singling out the "big media". As all media underestimated the severity of the situation, old and new formats, sadly some even do looking at Fox news and some weird "red pillers".
And if you want to compare the rate of growth of multiple countries with different start dates, and the effect of their efforts to slow said rates of growth, then you use a logarithmic graph.
You want to see literal numbers? Use a linear graph. You want to compare two exponential curves? Use a logarithmic graph.
I mean, what the actual fuck. How often have you posted graphs from Financial Times comparing multiple countries? Every single one is a logarithmic graph.
Were you disingenuous then? Or are you disingenuous now? (If I were you, I'd take the latter option, as it's a better overall look for your integrity.)
Wow. See above re: the Financial Times. Keep digging that hole.
I mean, in an earlier post, you literally claimed the opposite!
Yeah, pro-tip, those were logarithmic graphs...
Yup, thus begin the ad hominems. That means you're winning, right? /s
The primary difference between my graph and yours was that mine was logarithmic instead of linear. You said that using a logarithmic visualization was wrong. What other inference was I supposed to make from that?
Also, I notice that you entirely sidestepped the idea of finding support for your assertion, whatever the heck you wan to claim it is.
And you claim I'm the one building strawmen? Please.
I didn't say "data". The use of a definite article was clear; I said "the data," which is entirely in reference to the rate of growth data that is the only thing we've been discussing. I mean, there's zero chance that you can possible infer that I'm talking about all data, given the length of this discussion.
How pathetically disingenuous can you get?
*sigh* Why do I feel like I'm talking to a 6-year-old?
Humans have a hard time visualizing variations in exponential growth curves in general. Humans especially have difficulty comparing more than one exponential growth curve when they are not overlaid upon each other at a specific, relative starting point. Logarithmic graphs become essential when comparing multiple exponential curves, because the human eye is much more adept at comparing two offset slopes than it is two offset curves.
Do we really need to keep burying you further?
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils
I consider myself reasonably informed about this breakout (I've been reading a lot of stuff, probably more than the average person, true of most people taking part in this thread I would think), but I honestly didn't realise the outcomes in ICU were THAT bad. It was a real shock.
That's something which needs to be highlighted more in media coverage: 50% of the people who go into ICU in a non-overloaded system don't walk out again.
Wonderful news now where is the control group.
oh right over there the tens of thousands who recovered without this drug.
Was it the drug, was it the antibiotics, was it the other treatment???
Should be interesting what the eventual findings are and how they could pivot this into something truly successful but its way too early
Buh Byeeeeeeeeeeee !!
It's a good message, for sure. The WHO's praising of China's handling of the situation, after months of both trying to silence and play down the issue, is unacceptable. China's handling wasn't adequate. Even with the draconian measures they put in place, five million people had left Wuhan prior to the lockdown(Source: Business Insider). What's more, it it seems like Taiwan has been excluded by the WHA since at least 2016, with a health minister attending the meeting saying "There is simply no principled basis why Taiwan should not be here ... the only reason that it is not here now is because the government in Beijing does not like the current government in Taiwan" (Source: CNN). CNN has also reported that both former insiders and external observers have complained about the political influences within the WHO. What makes it even worse, is that in recent interviews in which questions about Taiwan are posed, they end up being shut down (Source: The Guardian).
Last edited by Magical Mudcrab; 2020-04-06 at 08:30 PM.
Sylvanas didn't even win the popular vote, she was elected by an indirect election of representatives. #NotMyWarchief