DW-NOMINATE, which has the nice benefit of being objective rather than rant based, has Biden's last Senate terms as sitting squarely in the median of the party when graphed. If the "most conservative" candidate is actually just right in the center of a party, everyone should be entirely unsurprised that he won over a bunch of fringe candidates.
Of course, if you're part of a whacky fringe, someone that's in the center of a party isn't going to be appealing, but no one much cares what fringe people think.
Biden has high favorability ratings with Democrats, but 34-41 favorable-unfavorable with independents (Yougov link). Only 13% of independents say they have a very favorable view of Biden.
- - - Updated - - -
I'm pretty sure it was just an inarticulate way of claiming that the Democrats picked the most conservative candidate from their current crop among those who had been in the Senate. Seems like a pretty stupid thing for someone to whine about, but what are ya gonna do?
Looks like you're correct, she was at 27% among independents with 57% expressing a strongly unfavorable view. That's amazing that someone so disliked was nominated in the first place, just a real blind spot I suppose.
Polling in early April isn't super meaningful - I'd strongly suggest sticking with a prior of a coinflip election until much better evidence emerges than we currently have. A national +6 would be a strong win, but it doesn't take much to put that at +2 and make the whole thing a coinflip on election day.
1) Biden isn't my candidate. 2) Biden is still the progressive choice vs Trump 3) This doesn't change that Sanders supporters who decide to sit out still own the consequences of their vote and I'm not going to let them hide behind "well you didn't do what I wanted so I shot the hostage and myself in the face so there." They got to sit there smug after 2016 and see how much damage has been done. And they apparently feel like doing it again.
It will be the fault of the people who don't vote for Biden. Because that's how elections work -- votes.it will be your camps own damn fault if you lose this election.
Yeah, and the Sanders supports who sat out 2016 or voted for Trump didn't learn apparently.almost like we've been down this road before....
[
And you still own the consequences for that vote. Because that's how voting works.
If Biden turns into Hitler why should anyone vote for him? I mean while we're throwing out meaningless scenarios.If Biden does a right-ward turn in order to win Trump voters why should anybody vote for him?
For.The.10000000th.Time. Judiciary. That alone should be enough.Biden needs to offer a clear message and vision of what he will do different if elected.
https://joebiden.com/joes-vision/Obama provided a clear vision in 2008/2012.
Knock yourself out.
I really don't want to sound like I'm campaigning for Biden when all I want is not to see Trump get another 4 years, but c'mon...this mess of misinformation and ignorance is cured with a 2 second google search.
- - - Updated - - -
So do Sanders and his supporters own his loss? Or does this only work one direction because you want it to?
And, again, no matter what you say each person owns the consequences of their vote at the end of the day. They may have reasons, justification or whatnot, but that doesn't mean they don't get to avoid getting called out for causing the outcome.
I'm increasingly skeptical of people who call themselves independents because it seems to have become a group of embarrassed republicans more than anything -- along with a bunch of progressives who won't consider themselves part of the Dems.
- - - Updated - - -
Do I really need to explain why a Trump win would be against a progressive's interests? I'm seriously not trying to be condescending but it at least to me it's so obvious why a relatively moderate Dem would be far better for a progressive movement than 4 more years of Trump.
And yet we have Sanders supporters actively rooting for Trump to win.
I'm happy to explain it if you like but I feel my posts have been pretty consistent in explaining it -- if you haven't seen them I can repeat.
I think you're failing to evaluate what their interests, possibly because you're not listening to them - they don't place much value on the things a moderate Democrat would bring for them. When they tell you, explicitly, that it's more important to them to be clear about their rejection of the current liberal order than to get a President that's more liberal than Trump, just believe them. That's their interest - you can tell that it's their interest because they tell you so and then go and act accordingly.
You are deeply mistaken if you think I'm willing to give anyone a pass on cross over voting regardless of the candidates. They get the same blame from me as anyone else. It's short sighted and voting against your own interests.
- - - Updated - - -
They tell me they want M4A. Student loan forgiveness. Etc. All of these will be set back decades under Trump. At worst under Biden they will stall. They may even incrementally move forward under Biden. Trump's fingerprint on the judiciary will destroy the progressive agenda for decades.
I believe they feel that way. I also believe that's irrational and self-harming in the long run.When they tell you, explicitly, that it's more important to them to be clear about their rejection of the current liberal order than to get a President that's more liberal than Trump, just believe them.
People can feel free to believe what they want. Trump supporters believe he's an honest and godly man. I am also free to believe what I believe and my stance has been pretty clear. People own the consequences of their vote. The judiciary is likely the #1 issue this election. 4 more years of Trump would harm the progressive agenda.That's their interest - you can tell that it's their interest because they tell you so and then go and act accordingly.
I get the frustration. But the progressive wing of the party need to realize that for whatever reason although they win popularity on single topics the movement as a whole just isn't getting over the finish line. My personal politics are a little all over the place but I do want to see the progressive agenda move forward. Warren was my choice this primary cycle so it's not like i'm a die hard moderate. But I deeply reject this "burn it all down until we get what we want" attitude some have because it's deeply harmful to many people including minorities, the middle class, and our relationships with other countries.
Plus I recognize this is MMOC -- the land where no one's opinion will change and my being a brash argumentative person isn't going to impact anyone. I would never be this hard with someone in RL where I could have an impact. I'd be much more nuanced.
I don't know man.
I voted for Clinton because of the judiciary, when I was thinking about writing in Sanders. If Clinton won, I reasoned, Merrick Garland would be on the bench, keeping SCOTUS from going hard right.
Then Clinton lost and we got Boofing Brett.
Here I am four years later with the same exact conundrum. If Biden wins, then whoever replaces RBG will probably be someone reasonable (maybe Merrick Garland again.) That keeps a hard right SCOTUS from going even further to the right.
Then Biden loses and we get . . . someone incredibly stupid and unqualified. Maybe Judge Jeanine, who the fuck knows with Donald Trump.
And that doesn't even touch the damage Trump has done to the lower courts.
Putin khuliyo