3rd time. Mods, close this fucking thread.
Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker
It’s mind boggling, because the scam is in the first sentence. That’s the thesis to the entire thing, which you can’t get passed, unless there is an assumption of a conspiracy. Obama had no authority to gather or dictate government or democrat roles. It requires the presumption of god king Obama, which simply the fact that Obama didn’t use available tools like executive orders and defense authorization as much as Trump, make it absurd... Obama could have implemented more liberal policy through executive orders and shit, but he didn’t... to think he would go after Trump, especially noting the speech he gave on Bush, when every liberal demanded his head in a pike... is absurd.
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
Which part of the Mueller Report was a conspiracy? The part where the Russians actively and concertedly interfered in our election? Should they not have investigated that? The part where members of the Trump campaign had numerous contacts with Russians offering them help with the campaign? Should they not have investigated that? Is it the part of the Mueller report you agree with, where they didn't find evidence of a conspiracy? Or just the parts you don't, like where they laid out Trump's instances of obstruction of justice along with the specific statutes he violated?
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit
As I pointed out earlier, Trump team meetings justified an investigation into Trump’s collusion, for the same reason the OP is inventing Obama meeting to justify an investigation into collusion. The problem being, we know what happened during Trump jr meeting, due to the direct tie of Russian ban on adoption being an excuse, with its enactment serving as revenge for Magynsky act.
Why would that be important, well:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegals_Program
That’s what initiated the prisoner swap, leading Russian poisonings in London.
People that were sent to US, by the same ones Trump met in 2013:
Trump in Moscow: what happened at Miss Universe in 2013
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...iverse-in-2013
Some of the conspiracy theorist need to explain why these two events on their own, do not necessitate an investigation, without intervention by a nobody like Obama?
- - - Updated - - -
Am I wrong? Did Russians steal 500000 US registration records? Why are you covering it up?
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
I thought this was pretty great timing considering the existence of this thread: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog...new-york-times
"We are well past “fears of politicization”. When the President’s loyalist Attorney General intervenes on the President’s behalf in a case in which a defendant/loyalist has already pled guilty in order to short-circuit a prosecution about which no disinterested party has raised any substantial question … well, that is the definition of politicization. It also comes after numerous similar actions by the Barr Justice Department.
One good way to judge these question is to imagine how the Times would cover a similar set of facts in another country. To suggest that this would be framed as leading to “fears of politicization” would be absurd.
When someone chops someone’s head off that does lead to fears of people being killed. That is people being killed.
It continues in the very first paragraph.
President Trump and his supporters on Friday praised Attorney General William P. Barr’s decision to drop the prosecution of Michael T. Flynn, even as career law enforcement officials warned that the action set a disturbing precedent and Democrats accused the administration of further politicizing the Justice Department.
“Democrats accused the administration …” Trumps supporters say it’s awesome. Democrats say it’s not awesome. To-May-toe, To-Mah-Toe …
Again, how would this article be written about events in another country? The question answers itself.
And then again …
Many current and former federal prosecutors across the country said they were shocked by the Flynn decision. But current and former department lawyers and F.B.I. officials also sent department leaders “significantly positive feedback” and “applauded the recommendation” to drop the Flynn case, said Kerri Kupec, a department spokeswoman.
Again, we learn that many current and former prosecutors find this a ‘shocking’ decision. But the Attorney General’s spokesperson told the Times that other unnamed officials said it was awesome. So who is to say?
We’ve learned this lesson many times. Contemporary journalism has an imperative for “balance” and also for accuracy. But in a pinch – and it’s in the domains of politics, public policy and governance where the pinch comes – the former wins out over the latter. Consistently. A better standard is accuracy and fairness. In a pinch, perhaps impartiality. Balance, as widely understood, is too often placed in opposition to accuracy. And it becomes an available crowbar by which bad faith actors can leverage favorably inaccurate coverage of themselves."
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit
Flagged for conspiracy mongering. Time to see if the rules get evenly applied.
"If you are ever asking yourself 'Is Trump lying or is he stupid?', the answer is most likely C: All of the Above" - Seth Meyers
So how does this work exactly? My thread about a jogger being shot was locked with next to not flaming or rule breaking and it wasn’t derailed should I just make another one on the same topic as there seemed to be a demand for it as people were discussing it Or would that be infactable?
It’s insulting that they think we are this stupid... people are complaining this is a conspiracy thread. I’d take issue with how the OP is absolutely flaming us, by thinking we are such fucking morons, that we wouldn’t see through it, within the first sentence. You can almost feel the sneer at us plebeians. Pretty harsh...
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi