Dumbass charity boss won’t accept 200k from rapper cuz values

[Nnyco]

Its weird not to accept money for starving children even when it comes from a piece of shit like him. Sorry lil Timmy, today you only get to eat values and reputations.

[Stelio Kontos]

Its weird not to accept money for starving children even when it comes from a piece of shit like him. Sorry lil Timmy, today you only get to eat values and reputations.

No, it's not weird for a charity that helps children to refuse money from someone who's been accused of sexual crimes with minors.

[Crissi]

Its weird not to accept money for starving children even when it comes from a piece of shit like him. Sorry lil Timmy, today you only get to eat values and reputations.

Why would donators who arent child abusers donate to a charity that accepts such donations? Seems like they'd lose more money than gain. Implies that the charity doesnt really care about their mission, and Id rather patronize a charity that does.

and now switch out child charity and child abuser with a domestic abuse woman's shelter with donations form rapist Brock Turner or Epstein's Estate and maybe can you see why that would be bad?

[Stelio Kontos]

Somewhat tangentially related to this, is there a betting pool on how long this runt keeps breathing after snitching on anybody and everybody he could?

[Zinstorm]

Somewhat tangentially related to this, is there a betting pool on how long this runt keeps breathing after snitching on anybody and everybody he could?

You want to make a bet on how long before a dude dies? Kind of messed up even if this isn't the greatest person. :/

[Stelio Kontos]

You want to make a bet on how long before a dude dies? Kind of messed up even if this isn't the greatest person. :/

I don't, I'm just wondering if it exists. I don't gamble anyhow. But the runt did snitch, and criminal organizations do have a certain reputation for not taking well to such things.

[PACOX]

You want to make a bet on how long before a dude dies? Kind of messed up even if this isn't the greatest person. :/

He is on house arrest off of a federal conviction and likely under protective custody. No one is going to lay a hand on him.

- - - Updated - - -

I don't, I'm just wondering if it exists. I don't gamble anyhow. But the runt did snitch, and criminal organizations do have a certain reputation for not taking well to such things.

[IMG]https://i.imgur.com/evmg8Bf.jpg[/IG]

He did some proper dirty snitching. The stuff kids run around yelling 'snitches get stitches for'. He all in on the dirt then sold everyone out to get a lesser sentence. Straight scummy behavior...all to be let on because of his asthma. You'd almost feel sorry for the people he ratted on if not for what they were caught up.

I only hope he takes his once in a century 2nd chance and does something with it.

[Not A Cat]

I was ready to come in here and agree, but then I saw who it was. Yeah, fuck that guy, that's some dirty money.

[Nnyco]

Why would donators who arent child abusers donate to a charity that accepts such donations? Seems like they'd lose more money than gain. Implies that the charity doesnt really care about their mission, and Id rather patronize a charity that does.

and now switch out child charity and child abuser with a domestic abuse woman's shelter with donations form rapist Brock Turner or Epstein's Estate and maybe can you see why that would be bad?

Its still refusing money for starving children and if you refuse to donate to such an organization because he donated there then you are an equally piece of shit. It is very sad that repuatations are more important that feeding a child.

[Themius]

Depends on how he hurt me. Sya mean things? whatev. Rape me? Id rather die. Epstein? Id also rather die

and i dont think you get the optics. "its for teh kiiiiiids" while simultaneously thinking tkaing money form a child abuser is ok. No, that horrible both optiocaly and as a message to the actual kids involved. Like, ti would undermine their message completely and their mission as aa charity. There's no shortage of rich people donating anyways.

I would be weary of this "child abuse" charge since he himself was 18, not too terribly far from the age of the child.

God.. when I was 13 and 14 I remember people dating seniors who were 17-18, and there was definitely sex.

- - - Updated - - -

Why would donators who arent child abusers donate to a charity that accepts such donations? Seems like they'd lose more money than gain. Implies that the charity doesnt really care about their mission, and Id rather patronize a charity that does.

and now switch out child charity and child abuser with a domestic abuse woman's shelter with donations form rapist Brock Turner or Epstein's Estate and maybe can you see why that would be bad?

One may think that perhaps due to their previous crimes they are trying to atone? But apparently atonement and trying to help the very people you may have wronged leads instead to you being even further shunned... which doesn't make much sense.

[Crissi]

I would be weary of this "child abuse" charge since he himself was 18, not too terribly far from the age of the child.

God.. when I was 13 and 14 I remember people dating seniors who were 17-18, and there was definitely sex.

- - - Updated - - -



One may think that perhaps due to their previous crimes they are trying to atone? But apparently atonement and trying to help the very people you may have wronged leads instead to you being even further shunned... which doesn't make much sense.

theres a huge difference between 18 and 13. Im sorry, but ew. That's senior in hs vs a middle schooler, and a lot of maturity difference. and it was a video, so child porn on top of that.

and that's up to the charity to decide. If they don't want that, that's fine. Its not like that charity specificaly is hurting for money. and given sex offenders, especially child sex offenders, have a stupidly low recovery rate, it's not the same to put him on the level as say, Michael Vick who for all intents and purposes has completely reformed (and the charity he works with consents to involving him)

[Trassk]

One may think that perhaps due to their previous crimes they are trying to atone? But apparently atonement and trying to help the very people you may have wronged leads instead to you being even further shunned... which doesn't make much sense.

so your saying all a child molester has to do to make up for the act is to just give money to a charity and their all cleared of any wrong doing?

Does this same way of thinking extend to a certain US president, who while possibly not having done a similar act, is considered just as hated by you and your piers? Just saying, trumps donated to a lotta charities, so is your disdain for him justified anymore since he did that?

[Themius]

theres a huge difference between 18 and 13. Im sorry, but ew. That's senior in hs vs a middle schooler, and a lot of maturity difference. and it was a video, so child porn on top of that.

and that's up to the charity to decide. If they don't want that, that's fine. Its not like that charity specificaly is hurting for money. and given sex offenders, especially child sex offenders, have a stupidly low recovery rate, it's not the same to put him on the level as say, Michael Vick who for all intents and purposes has completely reformed (and the charity he works with consents to involving him)

13-14 is high school freshman.

Calling it child porn seems silly. Like two teens getting arrested because they took pictures of themselves. Which ultimately makes no sense because you’re arresting people who are also the victim of themselves.

There’s also the problem that too many look older than their years.

And frankly when I was in high school for the first year I definitely eyed the guys on the baseball team quite a few seniors.

And the fact you keep grouping him into child sex offender as though he went out groomed and raped a girl... is ridiculous when they could very easily be in the same cohort. He was some man twice her age seeking people to groom.

- - - Updated - - -

so your saying all a child molester has to do to make up for the act is to just give money to a charity and their all cleared of any wrong doing?

Does this same way of thinking extend to a certain US president, who while possibly not having done a similar act, is considered just as hated by you and your piers? Just saying, trumps donated to a lotta charities, so is your disdain for him justified anymore since he did that?

Do you have trouble comprehending sentences?

How does "perhaps due to their previous crimes they are trying to atone, but they're being shunned for trying to atone which doesn't make sense"

equivalent in your head to "if you just give money to charity then you are absolved"

?????????? What the bloody hell are you even reading?

since when does "trying to atone" equal to "if you give money then they're absolved"

How in the fuck did you come up with that bit of bogus deduction???????

Man has anger problems and abuses wife goes to jail comes out

tires to donate to charities focused on abused women and feels genuinely bad

I say, at least he's trying to atone, shunning a person trying to atone doesn't make sense.

you say some fucking how

"Themius is saying if you give money that absolves crime!"

has basic critical thinking just flown out the fucking window?

[Trassk]

Do you have trouble comprehending sentences?

How does "perhaps due to their previous crimes they are trying to atone, but they're being shunned for trying to atone which doesn't make sense"

equivalent in your head to "if you just give money to charity then you are absolved"

?????????? What the bloody hell are you even reading?

since when does "trying to atone" equal to "if you give money then they're absolved"

How in the fuck did you come up with that bit of bogus deduction???????

so doesn't cross your own mind that a rapper using his own money to fake atone for what he did because he's rich enough to gain that kind of PR?

[Themius]

so doesn't cross your own mind that a rapper using his own money to fake atone for what he did because he's rich enough to gain that kind of PR?

So now you know what's in his heart? Now you get to decide whether any person's atonement or attempt at it, is genuine, based on what???

Trassk you should try thinking more about what I say before you reply.

Saying that people trying to atone shouldn't be shunned for their attempts, is not the same as money absolves all past ills. Do you get it now?

[Trassk]

So now you know what's in his heart? Now you get to decide whether any person's atonement or attempt at it, is genuine, based on what???

based on the fact this happens all the time in real life, rich and powerful people do terrible things, and when people find out, they just throw money at it to clear themselves of any bad public image.

Something tells me this is quite a personal offense to you.

[Machismo]

So now you know what's in his heart? Now you get to decide whether any person's atonement or attempt at it, is genuine, based on what???

Trassk you should try thinking more about what I say before you reply.

Saying that people trying to atone shouldn't be shunned for their attempts, is not the same as money absolves all past ills. Do you get it now?

First off, a 19-year old (or maybe even 20) having sex with a 13-year-old is not the same as a senior and a freshman... It's the same as a college freshman or sophomore and an 8th grader.

Now that that little bit of math is out of the way:

We don't know if his motives are genuine, but we do know that he once committed a sex act with a 13-year old kid when he was a fully-grown adult. The charity also knows that, and declined his money. If he wants to make a big deal out of it, and clutch at his pearls, I doubt he's going to find too many who are sympathetic to him. Of course, there will be some...

[Yuujin]

First off, a 19-year old (or maybe even 20) having sex with a 13-year-old is not the same as a senior and a freshman... It's the same as a college freshman or sophomore and an 8th grader.

Now that that little bit of math is out of the way:

We don't know if his motives are genuine, but we do know that he once committed a sex act with a 13-year old kid when he was a fully-grown adult. The charity also knows that, and declined his money. If he wants to make a big deal out of it, and clutch at his pearls, I doubt he's going to find too many who are sympathetic to him. Of course, there will be some...

He should just find a way to donate it anonymously. If he is trying to repent for past crimes on some level then he shouldn't be worried about the tax write off that comes with it. If he cares about the kids, then he shouldn't be seeking the glory.

That's what the OP and people who are saying the charity should accept his money are missing. The charity boss isn't the dumbass. You are (not you personally) for supporting this asshole who isn't doing the right thing. It's just another write off and an attempt to rebuild his reputation. He can go fuck himself if he's going to do it at the expense of poor and hungry kids.

[breadisfunny]

I would be weary of this "child abuse" charge since he himself was 18, not too terribly far from the age of the child.

God.. when I was 13 and 14 I remember people dating seniors who were 17-18, and there was definitely sex.

- - - Updated - - -



One may think that perhaps due to their previous crimes they are trying to atone? But apparently atonement and trying to help the very people you may have wronged leads instead to you being even further shunned... which doesn't make much sense.

why i am NOT surprised your in here defending a potential child abuser?

[Shadowferal]

Maybe they don't want money from snitches.

I was going to mention that...
Dude is a snitch...he's done.