More or less in agreement here. You could pick and choose articles from whatever narrow media source you use to form a narrative.
Not really in disagreement - in order to detain or engage with violent people, you will have to use "aggressive behaviour".It is well know how the police acts in the US, how the police Union functions and how police are trained. There is actual training seminar footage out there that encourages aggressive behaviour. This modus operandi is clearly reflected in their actions reported on by the press.
This is obviously true as well. The problem was an innocent person got killed. The interpretation of why is related to media bias (as indicated by the comment I was replying to).While we can question if the death of a black women was an accident or not, what we cannot question is how police officers, who's job is to maintain peace went in guns blazing i would argue that this behaviour, how they are trained to deal with situations is the root problem here not the media bias.
If anything they do a better job to protect women a lot more than men. Being black as well as female would do virtually nothing to increase any real risk to an entire demographic. Women (black) just aren't receiving much violence from the police compared to men (black or white).This is also a vicious circle the more the police acts as they do the more people tend to become increasingly distrusting and the more unsafe the US becomes for "peace keepers", what in their turn leads to using more violence on the public, especially a certain demographic of the public.