Worth remembering, this also happened at the BLM riots/protests. State troopers and county deputies were outed causing damage and harm in Oakland.
Plainclothes California highway patrol officers have walked among demonstrators for weeks, report stated
Government Affiliated Snark
"Undercover officers infiltrated a racist group known for inciting riots and violence, get their cover blown and one has his picture taken from a very convenient angle while holding off crowd known for violence, rioting, and murder of police" There, I fixed it for you.
O Flora, of the moon, of the dream. O Little ones, O fleeting will of the ancients. Let the hunter be safe. Let them find comfort. And let this dream, their captor, Foretell a pleasant awakening
Totally had nothing to do with Omar being afro-latino, certainly not right.CNN's Josh Campell, who also was in the area but not standing with the on-air crew, said he, too, was approached by police, but was allowed to remain.
"I identified myself ... they said, 'OK, you're permitted to be in the area,'" recounted Campbell, who is white. "I was treated much differently than (Jimenez) was."
Apparently that statement I just said is shaking the world of many fragile people who now have become victims due to witnessing someone else be a victim.
It's like an observer of a murder crying and calling themselves a victim... meanwhile the dead person? Well who cares?
As a reminder, wishing harm or death on others isn't appropriate for discussion regardless of recent events.
This warning has been added to the OP.
Moderator of the General Off-Topic, Politics, Lore, and RP Forums
"If you have any concerns, let me know via PM. I'll do my best to assist you."
Question, does doing such things warrant a perma ban?
Mod Edit: Perma-bans typically depend on several factors such as sustained behavior and severity. Actions that go against warnings or guidelines are liable for infractions, but especially dangerous comments will be treated in kind.
Last edited by Rozz; 2020-05-29 at 03:12 PM.
This as convincing an argument as "I'm not racist, but..."but
If you have to say 'but', you're confirming you are actually doing exactly what you're claiming you aren't.
Look, just admit you’re afraid to talk about human rights that shouldn’t be debatable in the first place owing to the fact that you don’t want to accidentally expose your tireless effort of ‘staying neutral’ which directly translates to siding with the oppressor.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
How many people need to be outraged over an injustice to be immune to prosecution? If my wife cheats on me may I burn my neighborhood down?
George Floyd's death was unnecessary and cruel and the cops responsible should be stripped of office and thrown in jail for life. But what about all the people's whose lives are ruined now? Don't they get anything for having their businesses destroyed?
I dunno; you people profess to be the experts at revolution with all that Second Amendment garbage, you tell me what an acceptable level of civil disobedience looks like.
There is that word again.But
What is it about this that you aren't getting? Using George Floyd's death as a point of moral comparison is a form of invalidation. You are reducing the human cost to a moral cudgel and outing yourself by making an issue of the property damage rather than the actual cause of the problem; police brutality, and racism.
Here's a fun fact, Karen: your business being burned down is not the same as you being choked to death.
I get that y'all seem to find that confusing given the whole "It's my right to have a haircut" bullshit, but you really need to check yourselves.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Not only has protesting peacefully not worked, but people flipped out about peaceful protests, too. Kneeling inflamed them, blocking traffic was super inconvenient, etc. Given the fact that 4 centuries of largely unchecked violence--rubber stamped by the courts and the population at large--preceded this, I think people's restraint has actually been pretty remarkable. Doesn't it make you a little sick hearing yourself fretting that they should be "peaceful" about it?
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit