“There you stand, the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles to blood stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.”
"It doesn't matter if you believe me or not but common sense doesn't really work here. You're mad, I'm mad. We're all MAD here."
Are you seriously asking for a news article about a case where someone wasn't arrested and drove away from police officers, who didn't pursue them?
That wouldn't be news. That's just someone driving away from a police officer.
If you want policy, here's Ontario's regulations; https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ontar...hases-1.193225
Key points;
2.(3) A police officer shall, before initiating a suspect apprehension pursuit, determine whether in order to protect public safety the immediate need to apprehend an individual in the fleeing motor vehicle or the need to identify the fleeing motor vehicle or an individual in the fleeing motor vehicle outweighs the risk to public safety that may result from the pursuit.
You don't pursue to begin with unless the suspect poses a significant enough threat to public safety for it to be worth pursuit.
2.(5) No No police officer shall initiate a suspect apprehension pursuit for a non-criminal offence if the identity of an individual in the fleeing motor vehicle is known.
2.(6) A police officer engaging in a suspect apprehension pursuit for a non-criminal offence shall discontinue the pursuit once the fleeing motor vehicle or an individual in the fleeing motor vehicle is identified.
If you know the suspect or have their vehicle ID, and they weren't committing a crime, you let them go.
I don't need to pull up an example, which could be an exception, when I can point at the actual policy regulations.
Look at the results of protests for black lives...tell me who it's helping?
"It doesn't matter if you believe me or not but common sense doesn't really work here. You're mad, I'm mad. We're all MAD here."
“There you stand, the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles to blood stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.”
“There you stand, the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles to blood stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.”
"It doesn't matter if you believe me or not but common sense doesn't really work here. You're mad, I'm mad. We're all MAD here."
Obviously. Just as everyone looting is part of BLM. People are always one thing or the other. There are no subgroups. There are no opportunists. There are most definitely no white supremacists sowing additional chaos trying to cause a race war. Every thing is either on one side of the line or the other. This man was looted by BLM, so obviously he was law enforcement. That's your logic. Don't blame me.
“There you stand, the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles to blood stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.”
I guess this dealership was part of the problem too, oppressive car salesman must have been a racist or something....
https://www.wisn.com/article/protest...rship/33725158
"It doesn't matter if you believe me or not but common sense doesn't really work here. You're mad, I'm mad. We're all MAD here."
“There you stand, the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles to blood stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.”
"The police officer assaulted the guy, so he couldn't let him go without trying to murder him" is not the argument you think it is.
The officer failed to restrain the guy. There is no circumstance where the guy getting into his car would warrant opening fire on him. There isn't even any indication he had any reason to assault the guy in the first place.