My dude, I don't need to read a wiki to understand what Ad Hominem is. You should read the wiki more closely though because you clearly don't.
Here's how fallacies work - If fallacious reasoning is used in order to support a conclusion, then the argument is invalid. That doesn't however say anything about the truth value of the conclusion itself.
In this particular case, I called you an edgelord (implied argument: edgelords are particularly concerned about being able to use language which is offensive > you seem particularly concerned about language which is offensive being used > you're probably an edgelord) but my calling you that wasn't supporting any other conclusion reached. The actual argument was that you're acting as though them removing the line is part of some wider SJW agenda, even though no evidence of that is apparent, and the only person drawing attention to it is you which would imply that if any agenda is being promoted here, it's yours.
OH BTW: "I guess you're not so different after all"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque. Look brah, I actually am invested in calling people out for being edgy douchebags, and I'm not pretending otherwise. You, on the other hand, are trying to make out like this isn't just about you wanting the game man to say bitch because it's about censorship instead...or something. Saying that we're 'no different after all' actually hurts your case so...good logic, I guess?
Rly if you want to do all the logic stuff, you should read about it instead of watching JBP and Ben Shabino and assuming that you know what you're on about even a little bit.