Nah nonsense, the ad hominem attack Nonsense, no if an argument is weak or stupid it should be challenged, especially when a lot of it is script and copy pasta, along with suspicious links to discredited sources.
There is nothing wrong with pointing out a stupid argument is a stupid argument along with the fact from where it came. It might not seem relevant but it is. A woman talking about demon Sperm really has ZERO else to say about anything medically.
Just as a Sexist and Racist Homophobic bigot has nothing to say about policing culture or language while at the same time whining about being censored.
I also don't think it is ever reasonable to suggest anyone should be anything but hostile to horseshit arguments such as "The Jews did it" or "All homosexuals are Pedophiles".
I sincerely don't a flying fuck what anyone things a reasonable argument can be made of that kind of stupid shit.