Agreed. The larger lesson is: Don't let the older part of your age cohort define you. Because they're most likely bougie sellouts
As a Gen Xer, it utterly pains me to see olders Gen-Xers, 50-55 year olds, among the core of Trump's base.
Also painful, watching these guys pretend to be waay into the Beatles and Led Zeppelin. Basically a form of virtue signaling to Boomers. eff that.
Government Affiliated Snark
there is no such thing as Gen X they are just Sub-Boomers
You don't care if he politicizes it to try to help his campaign, just if Pelosi demands that Americans get a stimulus check without administration fuckery?
No, Republicans are. Democrats passed this shit back in May, Republicans twiddled their thumbs until the night of the exam and are begging for an extension.
Once again, you continue to unintentionally repeat Republican talking points. I know you say this isn't intentional, but the frequency with which you repeat them calls that into question IMO.
Graham slipped, and asked about the good old days of segregation.
When will we stop pretending the GOP is nothing but racist old crusty dudes?
This indicates a fundamental misunderstanding of the situation, what the disagreements are, and what the causes are.
Remember that time Trump tweeted out that he wasn't going to sign anything until after the election?
Remember when he was tweeting about individual parts?
Remember when he wanted it small?
Remember when he wanted it "GO BIG!"?
How are Democrats supposed to negotiate in good faith with that, when you have a Senate that's refusing to even show up to the negotiating table?
If Republicans made any attempt to negotiate, it wouldn't be.
No, if you want a meaningful aid package that won't require a secondary package to address larger issues that aren't just stimulus funding to people. Those larger issues being things like massive budget holes that will absolutely trickle down to consumers when cities and states start limiting services due to a lack of funding.
I get it, the "BUT PEOPLE NEED MONEY NOW! CALL J.G. WENTWORTH!" argument plays on the emotional strings and I agree with it on principle! But that's a small part of what is actually needed to support people and local/state governments that are all in desperate need of help.
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavir...etter-12099947
That heard immunity letter the Trump administration is embracing? It's got some very big names on it.
Dr. Johnny Bananas
Dr. Person Fakename
Mongolian singers practice "therapeutic sound"
Homeopathy "doctors"
Dr. I.P. Freely
Dr. of Hard Sums
- - - Updated - - -
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...e-group-finds/
Well that's awkward, even the conservative AEI can't show that Biden's tax plan will kill the economy. Quite the contrary it will have a minimal impact on economic growth while adding trillions in additional revenue.President Trump says Joe Biden’s tax plan would bring about a depression and destroy the country.
Independent studies have found no support for that claim. And the latest, an updated examination of the Biden proposal from the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, should drive a stake through it.
The analysis concludes Biden's plan would raise $2.8 trillion over the next decade from higher taxes on businesses, corporations and the wealthiest households. Over that time, AEI projects the higher taxes would reduce economic growth by a relatively modest 0.16 percent.
The plan would “make the tax code more progressive,” AEI’s Kyle Pomerlau and Grant Seiter write. And after slightly crimping growth in its first decade, it would “reduce debt-to-GDP in the second decade, leading to slightly higher GDP. However, in the long term, his plan would not raise enough to stabilize debt-to-GDP and would lead to a 0.18 percent smaller economy.”
The macroeconomic drag the AEI model anticipates roughly aligns with other analyses from the Tax Foundation and the Penn Wharton Budget Model, Pomerlau notes. In other words, rolling back most of the Trump tax cuts wouldn’t bring about the economic Armageddon the Trump campaign has depicted.
Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker
For now. Who knows what he'll want by dinnertime?
Either way it's not on the check, it doesn't need to be on the check. The check comes from the Treasury department, not the Oval Office. It's no different than the letters from him food banks are throwing away that are packed in with food donations from farmers facilitated by the government.
Neither do I, and it's wrong to do to begin with.
Why is it Democrats fault for not agreeing to a deal, and not Republicans fault for not agreeing to a deal? Simply because Trump has to sign it? Why can't it be his fault that his Treasury Secretary can't negotiate a deal. Why won't Mnuchin accept what Pelosi is offering?
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi