"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Sylvanas is bad character.
Kael'thas is cool tho.
Jin'do wasn't that famous, I'd rather see Zekhan as Anduin counterpart for the Horde.
Baine is lame, should be another character.
Elisande is cool.
I'm sure Alleria would never actually corrupt the Sunwell. She seeks to preserve Quel'Thalas, not destroy it. She genuinely wants to protect her beloved homeland, even if her own path brings her elsewhere. Regardless, she could do that, and if Blizzard wanted to cause massive conflict in Quel'Thalas for story development, they could indeed use Alleria to accomplish this.
Last edited by Varodoc; 2020-10-22 at 03:54 PM.
The Void. A force of infinite hunger. Its whispers have broken the will of dragons... and lured even the titans' own children into madness. Sages and scholars fear the Void. But we understand a truth they do not. That the Void is a power to be harnessed... to be bent by a will strong enough to command it. The Void has shaped us... changed us. But you will become its master. Wield the shadows as a weapon to save our world... and defend the Alliance!
Again, 3 of these people have already tried to destroy the Horde and kill all it's members. Forget evil, they are horrible leaders that do not care one bit about you, so why... why would you want them back? None of the Horde's characters is stupid enough to follow these monsters again, why do you want them to be more stupid?
Given how Koltira made a truce with Thassarian just because they were pals (and merrily joined the Forsaken out of all people), what does that have to do with the idea that the Ebon Blade should have had an issue with the Forsaken?
And he was one individual on a personal vendetta, who did not represent the organization. Plus I don't think he made a distinction between the Forsaken and the Scourge.
Like i said if they would put some effort in these characters instead they turned them into villians for the Alliance to kill and they can only come up with a story that they turn against the Horde just so that we Horde players also have a reason to kill them that is all.
Every time a character is doing something that benefits the Horde and is negative for the Alliance is turned into a WoW raid/dungeon boss at some point.
Last edited by tromage2; 2020-10-21 at 01:44 PM.
Agreed. She said in the comic that shall not be named that she wants to "redeem" them, which Sylvanas mocked obviously, because such a notion reflects hope and a fundamental believe in the goodness of the Blood Elves, which she does not share.
Sadly as long as there are two factions in the game it will remain a dream. Blizzard will never take the Belfs away from the Horde. After all, that would make them loose 60% of their playerbase.
Oh well, now where we can be High Elves with Void-hair like our leader, I am not to bothered about them joining the Alliance anymore. They will regret joining the Horde again and again until the end of time.
Last edited by Raisei; 2020-10-21 at 02:10 PM.
I agree, but the horde council smacks of the alliance before the high king nonsense..
But if these powerful people were horde leaders, then that would be awesome. Kael'thas, Elisande, Sylvanas and Rastakhan - are POWERFUL, so is Thrall or Grommash.
But the horde is powerful without op leaders, the reason alliance has OP characters is cos blizzard is too lazy to develop and progress other races outside humans, so other races are literally 1-2 over powered characters who are the only ones that do anything important.
And they do that because Gazrug, you and many others demand to be villains by wanting the worst people possible as their leaders:
Sylvanas has been a villain since WC3, Garrosh since Cata and even before that everyone knew he was not trustworthy. They haven't been turned into villains, they were villains from the start of their careers and that is exactly why you and Gazrug like them.
But more importantly, you are missunderstanding something. The reason why the Horde keeps being turned against these people is so that the Horde can keep existing after the eventual defeat of their psychopathic leader. Blizzard needs to constantly twist the plot so that you people can enjoy being bad guys while never suffering the punishment for that.
We are on the second time now where the Horde should have been annihilated for all the crimes it has commited and again we pretend that all of that was just the evil Warchief, when everyone knows it is not so. The second time where the Alliance should say "enough" and end the Horde once and for all, but we can't because your status as player characters protects you. So Blizzard has to come up with ridiculous explanations like "Alliance + Horde rebels are not enough to take Orgrimmar" yeah riiiight.
Now we have this resolved, we finally have a peace (as much as I hate that the Alliance is forced to forgive and forget again...) and can stop with this nonesense, but nooo, you people are at it again and Blizzard will again cater to your demands in an expansion or two.
If you ever wonder why the plot of the game can not evolve and get better then realize it is because these demands that force the game to constantly repeat the faction war story. A plot that can never go anywhere meaningful.
Thrall is easily the best warchief the Horde could have.
And I agree with Kael, but it is too late for him. He always wanted the best for the blood elfs.
I believed that Sylvanas could of been the best leader horde had. And it was shaping up so, initially. Ruthless and tyrannical, sure, but with unshakable loyalty to her people. I believed that in time it would become loyalty to the Horde as a whole.
But the novels and comics pretty much outed her as cartoon evil, and it was just a matter of time 'till she became Garrosh 1.5.
At this point, anything but council type ruling body would make no sense, even for AB's level of writing. And I am glad that Gallywix got ousted, he was a horrible leader choice, which was obvious even in the goblin starting zone. Hell, I think Gazlowe and Lor'themar are the only 2 leaders worth a damn right now, everyone else has more complexes that a 13 year old girl that just hit her growth spur.
Even putting my thoughts on the personality and actions of the Horde council members, I doubt this would work. Usually when Blizzard pulls a character they've been ignoring for years out of the storage bin and want us to suddenly start caring about them it doesn't exactly pan out. Ji is a lost cause by this point. He's so irrelevant and devoid of any meaning he didn't play any significant role even in the expansion he got added in.
Don't you worry, the bright minds that champion the idea of HORDE BIAS hiding in every corner of reality to kidnap and devour the children of Alliance players will find a way. And a way just arrived on a silver platter: Shadowlands. Why did more Horde characters die? So that there'd be more Horde characters in the expansion about the afterlife! I cracked this one right open.
Both elisande and kael have a simmilar story in that they avcepted the legion because they saw no other outcome.
Kael is getting back into the fold.. so what about elisande?
She should be in revendreth tbh.
Elisande may actually be lost in time or something, given that she reappears and talks to you after you kill her in the Nighthold. Not sure what happened to her if she was actively in the place between timeways when the Nightwell was disrupted by the removal of the Eye of Aman'Thul, though.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
I'm not quite sure on that score. Echo or not, she reacts to the events of the fight and your defeat of her, and then she also aids the players during the Gul'dan encounter by providing the Time Dilation buff. She fades when the encounter ends, but whether or not she might somehow remain extant to some degree is left open. Not to say it's conclusive either way, though.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Unshakable loyalty? What? Where?
"Before her waited a grotesque, quivering mass of corpses, their armor piecemeal, their bodies broken, the stench unimaginable. Their plaintive, desperate gazes reminded her suddenly of children. They disgusted her. But their need empowered her." - Edge of Night
You said that the novels and comics turned her cartoonishly evil, but that is not quite true, unless you want to make it sound like there is a lot of ingame characterisation for her that would somehow disagree with them and that is simply not the case. Of course she pretends to care about the Forsaken during some of their quests, but we never see her inner thoughts in game. For that the books and comics are the only source and here she considers the Forsaken little more then tools or literal meat shields. Protection against her own death and revisiting of the Maw.
I really don't know where you see this unshakable loyalty.