And the difference with me is, despite my ideological end-goals including things like "the complete deconstruction of the capitalist system" and "a comprehensive basic income and support system so that every citizen can live a comfortable life, regardless of their personal choices", I don't agree that slaughtering tens and more likely hundreds of thousands of people I disagree with is a price I'm willing to pay for that utopia that I envision. I'd rather deal with an imperfect society and nudge it ever-closer to that goal than to engage in a campaign of mass-murder of those who oppose me.
In other words; incrementalism. Because the only alternative really does boil down to killing people you disagree with en masse. What I'm willing to accept is a much broader range than what I propose as the ideal eventuality.