Oh look, WoW lost subs at an average of 100k a month with just little bumps and a couple of huge, expansion-starting peaks. In other words Cata, MoP and WoD all shared the same steady rate of attrition from WotLK until they stopped publishing the figures.
- - - Updated - - -
It's also the best if you look at subs gained.
Be careful who you chat it up with here on these forums. If you are NOT for WoW and about WoW, people will report whatever you say and get you banned
It shows that WoW has a steady decline from the end of WotLK to the last announcement with expansions causing large peaks that disappear within a few months and very slight wiggles to do with patches. The most you can say about MoP is Isle of Giants managed to get a slight increase in subs, something no post-Wrath mid-expansion patch has managed.
I'll take an infracture just say you're a fucking dumbass for saying mop was a bad expansion.
I am reminded of an old adage... There are lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics. The Pandyr, while visually striking art, appears to be nothing more than customization options for Pandarean. I do like the facial markings and beards in the concept art... I suppose they look a little leaner than the current Pandarean but given the bulky armor that could be an illusion.
they look awesome, should be introduced as allied race
Pandaria was one of the best expansions to date, and using subs as your measure of success is a completely idiotic, and useless way to measure performance. Also anytime anyone says Pandaria was bad because of "whimsical" Pandas or something like that, I can no longer take anything they say seriously.