No objections from me, as far as i'm concerned capitalism is free to die tomorrow!
But even within capitalist system those flows can be regulated, and development plans can be established.
With increased remote work bringing high-speed internet to rural areas could move at least some jobs away from metro areas, and that's the kind of investment that could happen on federal dime.
That's regulatory failure. "Legal" is whatever is written in laws; laws that are written and passed by legislators.5> Anticompetitive practices are, again, capitalism in a nutshell. Antitrust actions are not easy to prosecute, because those corporations will invest millions in their own defense. Particularly difficult when not all anticompetitive actions are even illegal. Because, again, breaking down the competition is how capitalism works.
Where do you see "hate it"???6> Literally admits that antitrust enforcement is part of Biden's plan, but whines that it doesn't matter, because this guy had his mind made up and it literally did not matter what Biden's platform was, he was gonna hate it.
It's Democrat activist in deep-Red area, all he is saying is that it is distrusted - and distrusted for a reason given similar promises by Obama and subsequent failure.
He doesn't; he attacks Trump if you would bother reading actual article.7> Seriously, for all the attacks on Democrats in this, itemize what Republicans have actually done for rural America. Not empty campaign promises, actual passed legislation. He skips over this, because it's indefensible.
Which "meaningful change/adaptation" are you talking about?8> They're literally arguing against change, while claiming to desire change. His final paragraph is a desire to return to a mythical past that never existed, while refusing to consider actual, meaningful change and adaptation to circumstances, moving forward into a new future.
Naturally people hope to avoid anything that looks like "Rural must die".