Game literally has game crashing bugs, is propably (need to check) game to be axed from ps store, is unplayable (not in meme sense, like actuall) on last gen console. And those lying assholes have the audacity to come and say in their "apology" that the game meet their standards on last gen consoles. You need to literally boot it to see how fucked it is.
Nothing, not even fallout 76 or anything released by bethesda even come close. And give me a breat. witcher 3 on release day (bought it) was flawless compared to it. The most annoying shit in witcher 3 before patches was ui and item managment.
And I have the game on a mid-spec PC from 4 years ago with more than 70 hours on the game without a single game-breaking bug to be experienced yet. As many others do and have said so repeatedly, both here and elsewhere. Does this mean that it was fine on last gen consoles or that it has no bugs on PC? No it doesn't. But does it mean it doesn't run for anyone and it's simply "bad" or "unplayable"? Again no. And that was my point.
Modern gaming apologist: I once tasted diarrhea so shit is fine.
"People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an excercise of power, are barbarians" - George Lucas 1988
I have no reason to doubt it was unplayable for you or anyone who says it was for them. However, I know how it runs on mine and my friends' computers, while I have no reason to doubt the people that say it runs fine on theirs, too. So what does that mean? That it was unoptimised, which is an entirely different thing than "unplayable for everyone" full stop. From there on, I hope you managed to get a refund and spent that money on something you enjoyed.
I had good FPS, it wasn't "unoptimized". I had horrendous shit amount of bugs that broke the game multitude ways or made it outright unplayable. And I did get refund which I am glad of. As far as enjoyment go, I never was given the chance to enjoy the game because of how bugged it was.
Modern gaming apologist: I once tasted diarrhea so shit is fine.
"People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an excercise of power, are barbarians" - George Lucas 1988
Modern gaming apologist: I once tasted diarrhea so shit is fine.
"People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an excercise of power, are barbarians" - George Lucas 1988
ask PS4 users what the game is like. Hardware clearly matters especially when trying to smorgasbord every piece of lighting and shadows you can to sell the dream of "night city"
I like how people are defending this game and they have to emphasize "on PC" like them selling on consoles doesnt matter. The fact sony had to remove the game from the shop says all that is needed to be said. I think thats only been done once before with some ultra buggy cricket game.
Suri Cruise and Katie Holmes are SP's.
as rpg elements go cyberpunk blows witcher 3 out of the water in almost every aspect
the bad things are the bugs ofc,the cut content,the weird gameplay design choices with cops teleporting(this is not a bug) and if you prefer the setting of witcher 3
but in every other aspect,this game is a huge step up from witcher 3
witcher 3 is awsome,but people seem to have a really huge love boner for the game,but it doesnt really offer much as an rpg,dragon age inquisition has more rpg elements
ofc im not saying that makes witcher 3 a bad game,just not an amazing rpg,its very limited
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjFM0joet_4
Imma call bs on the 15 fps
I don't get how you thought I inferred your PC specs had anything to do with the game not running for you, but I guess this is what you get on an internet debate nowadays. The reason I mentioned that my PC is mid-low spec was that I wasn't trying to say that it ran fine because I had a super-computer or anything, rather that it just did.