Originally Posted by
Thekri
Well sure, obviously the Northern Grids are more prepared for that particular scenario, because it is more common. The root causes aren't really related to the actual mechanical failures, those are engineering problems which are solvable. The real issues stem from the "culture" of our grid. IE, where the motivation to maintain and repair it comes from. It is why deregulation is extremely dangerous, as Texas is demonstrating right now, but Trump repealed a ton of regulations that leave the rest of the US grids vulnerable as well. I view the price gouging as a separate, but related issue to the actual failures.
The real concern isn't specifically an ice storm, it is ANY low frequency event that disrupts production. The US is pretty used to losing power distribution, it happens all the time in hurricanes and severe storms. Line breaks, mass transformer outages, etc. We can resolve those issues pretty well. What happened in Texas is that they lost production, which is a much rarer incident, and much harder to recover from (And much more expensive to guard against).
This is why is certain conservative idiots are blaming it on renewables, which has a certain amount of truth, but is totally missing the point. Wind and Solar were not contributing to the grid during the ice storm, which is totally normal and planned for, but the problem is that the combustion sources failed at the same time, which is normally what would take up the slack. This caused a dramatic productivity drop. So yeah, they do have a point. This is the problem with having too much renewables on the grid, I have been saying that for years (Not that Texas is anywhere near that point). That isn't really the point though, the problem is that the whole infrastructure didn't plan for an event that forces both to shut down at the same time, and THAT is something that is common to the entire North American system. Now our production facilities are pretty well geographically separated in the other two grids, dramatically reducing the chances that a single natural event will hit enough to do that to the whole East Coast. The west coast is slightly more vulnerable, but still better off then Texas.
The specific thing most people are really concerned about for the other two grids is a cyber attack. Or worse, a combined cyber/physical attack. That ignores geographical separation, and could absolutely drop the grid for either the east or west coasts for potentially months. And just like Texas didn't invest in weatherproofing their systems, the rest of the US isn't investing in hardening its grid from cyber. I see it as more of a when, not if.