1. #28441
    This really is going to be Links Awakening again isn't it?

  2. #28442
    Banned Video Games's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Portland (send help)
    Posts
    16,130
    Quote Originally Posted by dope_danny View Post
    This really is going to be Links Awakening again isn't it?
    Probably. Which i got over eventually.

  3. #28443
    Quote Originally Posted by Video Games View Post
    Probably. Which i got over eventually.
    I mean, the only complaints I ever saw about Link's awakening was
    1) random FPS drops
    2) the screen blur.

    Otherwise it was received pretty well, and I think it's kinda funny that it's being used as like, a "doom and gloom" phrase (not by you).

    https://www.metacritic.com/game/swit...inks-awakening

  4. #28444
    Banned Video Games's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Portland (send help)
    Posts
    16,130
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester Joe View Post
    I mean, the only complaints I ever saw about Link's awakening was
    1) random FPS drops
    2) the screen blur.

    Otherwise it was received pretty well, and I think it's kinda funny that it's being used as like, a "doom and gloom" phrase (not by you).

    https://www.metacritic.com/game/swit...inks-awakening
    I still dont like the model eyes, physics and just how slow it feels when i can speed run dx in 3-4 hours. Its at least nice to look at when dp look like ugly funko pops
    Last edited by Video Games; 2021-02-27 at 05:57 PM.

  5. #28445
    Quote Originally Posted by Video Games View Post
    I still dont like the models, physics and just how slow it feels when i can speed run dx in 3-4 hours. Its at least nice to look at when dp look like ugly funko pops
    I mean, to each their own on the style, but honestly it's not like character models were ever good looking in the older games. Everyone was basically a squished box that had two legs that moved. This is a step up from that.

  6. #28446
    Banned Video Games's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Portland (send help)
    Posts
    16,130
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester Joe View Post
    I mean, to each their own on the style, but honestly it's not like character models were ever good looking in the older games. Everyone was basically a squished box that had two legs that moved. This is a step up from that.
    You could get away with it as sprites. These are just ugly. I also bet these arent even gonna be 1080 60 docked, but 720 30 with slowdown

  7. #28447
    Banned Video Games's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Portland (send help)
    Posts
    16,130
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    Lots of ppl on here QQ’d about the price. But they think $40 is too much for an upgraded D2, so I kinda roll my eyes at that shit.
    It wasnt. Anybody who asked me if they should get it i told them to just play dx

  8. #28448
    Titan Yunru's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    The Continent of Orsterra
    Posts
    12,407
    Meanwhile i am waiting for for BD II copy here....

  9. #28449
    Titan
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    America's Hat
    Posts
    14,142
    Quote Originally Posted by Yunru View Post
    Meanwhile i am waiting for for BD II copy here....
    I prefer in store orders so I can get games on release. So far it's been pretty good.

  10. #28450
    Over 9000! Poppincaps's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Twilight Town
    Posts
    9,498
    Quote Originally Posted by dope_danny View Post
    This really is going to be Links Awakening again isn't it?
    Links Awakening shouldn't have been 60 dollars and the D&P remakes look way worse, but I guarantee they'll be 60 dollars as well.

  11. #28451
    Banned Video Games's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Portland (send help)
    Posts
    16,130
    Quote Originally Posted by Poppincaps View Post
    Links Awakening shouldn't have been 60 dollars and the D&P remakes look way worse, but I guarantee they'll be 60 dollars as well.
    Dont be silly xd https://www.bestbuy.com/site/pokemon...?skuId=6414121

  12. #28452
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester Joe View Post
    I mean, to each their own on the style, but honestly it's not like character models were ever good looking in the older games. Everyone was basically a squished box that had two legs that moved. This is a step up from that.
    This is huge step down from the old games.

    Huge bobblehead sprites work for small resolution portable screen. Turn it into straight 3D models for 1080p screen without any adjustments to proportions and it looks ridicilously ugly.

  13. #28453
    Quote Originally Posted by Lahis View Post
    This is huge step down from the old games.

    Huge bobblehead sprites work for small resolution portable screen. Turn it into straight 3D models for 1080p screen without any adjustments to proportions and it looks ridicilously ugly.
    It's not.

    Ugly is subjective.

    Vaguely being able to make out ANY character models isn't better. It's fine to prefer the old style, but objectively speaking, being able to actually make out individual details is better than being a blob.

    If they reworked the game to look like Sword and Shield, you'd still have complaints.

  14. #28454
    Banned Video Games's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Portland (send help)
    Posts
    16,130
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester Joe View Post
    It's not.

    Ugly is subjective.

    Vaguely being able to make out ANY character models isn't better. It's fine to prefer the old style, but objectively speaking, being able to actually make out individual details is better than being a blob.

    If they reworked the game to look like Sword and Shield, you'd still have complaints.
    They should have at least looked like lets go. A clean and pleasant mix of gen 6 and 7

  15. #28455
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester Joe View Post
    It's fine to prefer the old style, but objectively speaking, being able to actually make out individual details is better than being a blob.
    Yet the models are literally blobs.

  16. #28456
    Quote Originally Posted by Lahis View Post
    Yet the models are literally blobs.
    I'd accept the comparison to funko pops more than this honestly.

    If you are genuinely trying to say the remakes look like blobs in the overworld, then this is a lost cause.

    In D/P defense, they had one of the best sprites, but it was still 80% head. Which honestly makes this remake pretty faithful to the original look, just with more expansion on how the model looks in 3D.

  17. #28457
    Over 9000! Poppincaps's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Twilight Town
    Posts
    9,498
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester Joe View Post
    It's not.

    Ugly is subjective.

    Vaguely being able to make out ANY character models isn't better. It's fine to prefer the old style, but objectively speaking, being able to actually make out individual details is better than being a blob.

    If they reworked the game to look like Sword and Shield, you'd still have complaints.
    Doubtful, because that's what everyone expected. Every remake has taken the art style of the game that came out before it. Fire Red/Leaf Green used Ruby/Sapphire's art style, Heart Gold/Soul Silver used Diamond/Pearl's, and Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire used X and Y's.

    I don't think Sword and Shield are pushing the boundaries of what the Switch can do unlike BotW or Nintendo's other First Party titles, but they looked passable. The Diamond and Pearl remakes don't look like Switch games. When they showed them off I legit thought they were mobile games.

  18. #28458
    Titan
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    America's Hat
    Posts
    14,142
    Quote Originally Posted by Vegas82 View Post
    I prefer digital orders since you can start playing a lot faster.
    I mean, if you sit at home all day, sure. I picked up my copy yesterday on my lunch break and was playing within 5 minutes of getting home from work

  19. #28459
    Quote Originally Posted by Poppincaps View Post
    Doubtful, because that's what everyone expected. Every remake has taken the art style of the game that came out before it. Fire Red/Leaf Green used Ruby/Sapphire's art style, Heart Gold/Soul Silver used Diamond/Pearl's, and Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire used X and Y's.

    I don't think Sword and Shield are pushing the boundaries of what the Switch can do unlike BotW or Nintendo's other First Party titles, but they looked passable. The Diamond and Pearl remakes don't look like Switch games. When they showed them off I legit thought they were mobile games.
    That isn't at all what I expected because it would, unlike the other remakes, it would literally make the game different.

    And if you honestly think people wouldn't complain about that, I would love to point to the fact that people complained about the demon souls remake making enemies look different.

  20. #28460
    Quote Originally Posted by Poppincaps View Post
    Links Awakening shouldn't have been 60 dollars and the D&P remakes look way worse, but I guarantee they'll be 60 dollars as well.
    Games should be what people are willing to pay for them. Nintendo isn't running a charity, and LA selling millions at $60 showed they made the right decision.

    It's really annoying when gamers act like video games are some essential supplies or some shit when they are luxury entertainment. If it's not in your price range for the game don't buy it- but don't act like an armchair CEO about how the price is wrong. Nintendo the most cash rich company in all of Japan probably knows a thing or two about running a business.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •