I've been following this thread and I've seen you say the same thing time and time again. Yes, we all understand that none of us are "The Arbiter" who decides what content is and what content is not. It's completely subjective. What one person considers something to be may vary from what another person considers something to be. We get it. You've made an excellent point. However, it objectively has nothing to do with the discussion. People are concerned about the long wait for new content and have started to argue over what exactly constitutes new content. As you have pointed out over a dozen times, no one person can make that call. We understand. I feel like you may just be arguing for the sake of arguing at this point. We all understand what you are saying and it's very clever but it adds absolutely nothing to the conversation and actually just seems to be annoying people. This is just my 2 cents. And yes, I realise I am not the arbiter of what constitutes an annoying post in this thread.