There will be people who will try to optimize but not in general, no. What do you mean by full of optimizations in classic? On my server at least, aside from the occasional "1 shaman for windfury" I haven't really seen any groups looking for specific classes, just the generic, tank/heal/dps of any class or at most range/melee (except for the case where they already had too many of one class)
Edit: Looked over some of the pug groups that happened last week and I saw a pretty even spread of classes in the raids, like 8 warriors (including tanks), 4 locks, 5 mages, 6 rogues despite them having 16 warrior sign-ups
Are you talking about the 5 super try hard guilds or where is this full optimization coming from? My guild has been running with enhancement shaman and shadow priest since the release of naxx.
Last edited by kranur; 2021-05-10 at 11:29 AM.
People that optimize heroic dungeon group setup, do it with guildies, not in pickup groups.
Pugs will just be happy to have a tank or healer so they can actually run hc's
And shaman is pretty strong in all their 3 specs, so not like you will have a resto shaman in every group, ele and enhance bring more powerfull buffs to the group. So you should have no issue finding groups as a priest.
Yeah, I guess that could potential mean something else from expansion to expansion. Min max, to my eyes, would include stacking shamans for group totems, for example. Or a couple of shadow priests (although more rare but doable if you have a few locks and mages on your DPS chart, which is not that rare!)
I do agree that some min max will happen, but I think that it will be the least percentage of players going hat way. End of the day people will just chill a bit more than in retail.. well, maybe I get surprised.
Funny enough, I plan to min max pvp x)
Do not worry about that.
All healers in TBC are viable.
Ran a raid guild back in BC. I never had a problem running anything with specific types of healers. In fact, one of things I loved about BC is that each class was more unique than they are today, so you might have to approach things a bit differently depending on comp.
For raids as well as heroic dungeons, this remained true. I usually ran my Shaman as elemental (sometimes I ran him as resto), but did all of the content on a hunter (survival) with no issues and I was only 1 of 2 shamans in the guild (alliance). I regularly ran groups in raids and dungeons with the "wrong" comp and succeeded quite well.
Anyone who refuses to take you (assuming you understand what you are doing as a healer) is a person and/or guild to avoid.
Do you need BL? Nope
Is it better to have BL? Yes
By Classic minmaxing mindset that means you want shamans and anything else will be better than nothing but not really sought after.
Remember we did not -need- mages for dungeons? No, but we were stacking them as much as possible.
We did not need world buff to clear MC / BWL? No, but even in p6 we still don't raid MC / BWL without it.
Etc etc.
Ps: i hate that mindset but that is my experience from Classic. Even while leveling in phase one as a feral cat i had issues finding groups for dungeon runs. It was either "meleecleave / spellcleave or gtfo". Tbh i do not expect TBCC to be much better than that.
Last edited by Gratlim; 2021-05-10 at 01:37 PM.
Thank you all for your calming answers, I will avoid quoting but I'm glad to read your comments
The difference is that for some pug group, not everyone will min/max and spend 10min+ to find a Resto so they can shave off a few seconds on 1-2 bossfights.
If people are looking for a Resto Shaman in a 5man group, it's generally because they're a melee cleave without Enhance, but then Resto Shaman brings a lot more than just BL, Windfury is an insane dps increase for melees.
When we're talking about something like a ~20% dps increase for all three Melees in your party, it changes the equation by a lot.
Most Spellcleave / Meleecleave weren't your usual dungeon group, as their intention was clear a dungeon multiple times for efficient xp rates.
Putting aside that the Spell / Melee cleave Meta fit the Classic endgame perfectly.
Warriors are toptier at endgame => You need a lot of Warriors for Melee Cleave.
Mages are the best caster => You need a lot of mages for Spell cleave.
Hybrids dps sucks => Spell / Melee cleave still needs healers.
The difference in TBC is that more specs that are perfectly viable and competitive in the raiding Meta but do not necessarily fit into a toptier dungeon groups, hence people are still going to play those specs and will somehow do dungeons.
Not every Shaman will be Resto, nor will every Druid.
PROUD TRUMP SUPPORTER, #2024Trump #MAGA
PROUD TRUMP CAMPAIGN SUPPORTER #SaveEuropeWithTrump
PROUD SUPPORTER OF THE WALL
BLUE LIVES MATTER
NO TO ALL GUNCONTROL OR BACKGROUND CHECKS IN EUROPE
/s
I'd be more than happy to have holy priest running heroics with me, but don't suck priests! My eyes are on you way more than they're on the other healers, as my main on retail for many, many years is holy. Do not bring shame to the family