Why doesn't blizzard crack down on boosters abusing lfg?

[Twdft]

silenced people can play the game still. That is different than being banned. cool cool cool.

But in 9.1 they can't get on your tits by advertising in lfg tool.

[sam86]

And your "solid evidence" is coorelation which...to borrow the trite expression, does not equal causation.

it is 100% better than ur evidence of 'i have nothing so my word is more valid', at least i can back up my own words, what ground u have to claim the opposite?
is my word official? of course no, but is the result of collecting as much info available, if u can find better by all means show them, instead of just say stubborn 'no' and refuse to budge
also beside personal attack, where in ur words exactly do u see support or deny the idea that blizz attack boosters breaking blizz own code? i don't see u even mention it
(in case u missed my post, tldr: blizz isn't cracking because it benefits them in token sales)

- - - Updated - - -

silenced people can play the game still. That is different than being banned. cool cool cool.

it still actually a good move, i'm surprised and it just show i'm wrong and they do make - also extremely tiny - step towards right action
i wonder if that to please and silence us players and won't effect token sales or not, still imo it is a good move, and i'm puzzled

[cparle87]

it is 100% better than ur evidence of 'i have nothing so my word is more valid', at least i can back up my own words, what ground u have to claim the opposite?
is my word official? of course no, but is the result of collecting as much info available, if u can find better by all means show them, instead of just say stubborn 'no' and refuse to budge
also beside personal attack, where in ur words exactly do u see support or deny the idea that blizz attack boosters breaking blizz own code? i don't see u even mention it
(in case u missed my post, tldr: blizz isn't cracking because it benefits them in token sales)

So doubling down on correlation being causation. You claim to collect info... that no one but Blizzard have. Then you use the logical fallacy of "if you don't state you're against something you're really in support of it". And finish up with a conspiracy theory.

[sam86]

So doubling down on correlation being causation.

so blizz was ignorant for almost 11 years, but decided to be 'cautious' after their own official numbers dropped lower than even 2004? so 'cautious' that they had a security breached that leaked data info about users, and luckily for them most playerbase was busy fighting if leaked numbers of sub is accurate or not instead of actually giving a fuck about leaked info?
and u still didn't show proof of ur claim btw in case u missed that point, u showed nothing about how strong or weak or even if wow exist (last one is easy, just use this website as reference, but just do something)