Last edited by Elegiac; 2021-07-06 at 06:42 PM.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
And now we're back to tone policing, because calling people with long histories of being hateful bigots and pushing actual policies and laws that harm minorities "evil" is fairly accurate.
So are we tone policing or dealing with actual issues here? You say you want to do the latter but you seem stuck on the former.
Last edited by Rozz; 2021-07-06 at 07:19 PM.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
--
if you voted for any US presidential candidate in any general election then you're literally in the exact same boat as them.
Last edited by Rozz; 2021-07-06 at 07:20 PM.
While it's certainly possible to reason with someone to not be a bigot... shaming and ostracization also works, and may sometimes be the only resort left when reason doesn't work.
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance
--
Thank you. I know y'all zoomers are super into the Harry Potter and the clock app so I try to stay topical.
- - - Updated - - -
Again: the point of ostracization is not to convert people from bigotry. It's a public safety measure.
For instance - when a medical student is outed as being a massive racist and they don't get ostracized, what happens is they end up going on to be a massively racist doctor, which then results in decreased healthcare outcomes for minorities that are unfortunate enough to come into their care.
Bigotry is not and never has been a function of personal virtue.
Last edited by Rozz; 2021-07-06 at 07:20 PM.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
More the former, than the latter. but this was offline face to face, you actually think anyone on this site is gonna make a bigot more or less of a bigot? rofl. The real bigots don't come here in good faith, and the rest are also not posting in good faith just for the trolling lols. Like seriously...
“Logic: The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding.”
"Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others."
Ambrose Bierce
The Bird of Hermes Is My Name, Eating My Wings To Make Me Tame.
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
Democracy always had its issues. It is always prone to being kneecaped by demagoguery.
Plato's Republic has already pointed this is out in the earliest days of democracy.
Democracy, modern liberal democracy, democracy as we understand it and experience it today, born out of the Enlightenment has very heavily relied on humanist Enlightenment thought and Enlightenment institutions such as public education and a certain respect for empiricism to reign in the worst tendencies of democracy.
The problem is, what do you do when the systems and institutions we rely on to moderate democracy are gradually eroded to the point where they lose their effectiveness?
A logical answer would be reinforcing said systems and institutions before they are irredeemably weakened.
The problem is, the scale of the problem is often not fully realized until it might be too late.
Like honest to God.... Imagine if on the 6th that mob would have made it into the House chambers before the evacuation. That's a nightmare scenario and even if somehow Biden would have still been inaugurated, the institutional damage would have been irreversible.
The US for example still has now, a brief window, possibly until 2022 to do sufficient reform to save itself, but it's a rapidly closing window and I fear we're blowing it.
Brazil hopefully goes 180 and Bolsonaro loses bad enough to lose all notions of legitimacy. Because if he will manage to hold onto any shred of it, I just don't see him ever giving up power.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi