in another post i already explained how equal rights doesn't equate to a trasnfer of ownership to the workers i.e. communism and you ignored it. then you up with some mental gymnastics about how if these people voted for bernie, they must be communists and therefore this is a communist takeover? like...what? you have a few marbles loose. clearly you're not all there
Not to downplay this whole situation but if this is getting to you I cant imagine how you would feel if what happens on a daily basis in the US Armed Forces ever came to the light of day.
The end of forced arbitration for all employees.
Worker participation in oversight of hiring and promotion policies.
The need for greater pay transparency to ensure equality.
Employee selection of a third party to audit HR and other company processes.
SO you want some of the Decision making without the risk of a company? You want all the good and none of the bad? If you dont like what the company offers, quit and go somewhere else.
Seems insensitive for someone perpetually posting against someone for being insensitive. How do you know they were never assaulted? You have as much credibility in your claim as does the other poster.
- - - Updated - - -
Colin kaepernick got a private recruit me party from the nfl that other people never get. No one wants him cause he sucks. End of story. I do enjoy you trying to wrap his total lack of talent in the nfl as right wing cancel culture however.
uh, at what point did i say he isn't employed because the right? people wanted him kicked out of the NFL DURING his contract (trying to cancel him), not even talking about him not getting a contract afterwards. i do like how you ignore the dixie chicks, remember that? or french fries becoming "freedom fries." besides, you aren't arguing the point- conservatives love cancel culture (when it suits them). want to debate that or you gonna pull out more strawman arguments? you're cute when you try to argue points beside the actual point made, but now that i am directly asking you to demonstrate how the right doesn't engage in cancel culture you'll vanish. it's cute
Last edited by Explosivo; 2021-07-29 at 01:03 AM.
It's stumbling across random comments like this one, that make me realize there are genuine people out there, that fit the absolute definition of what an "asshole" is, perfectly, in this world.
I hope they calm down and explore themselves until the moment of epiphany when they understand that this was not worth the unnecessarily rude, poor choice of phrasing.
Exactly, and then there is the fact that if the company did implode, the employees would face the greatest losses while the executives would walk out with hundreds of millions a pop. So their risk factor is way lower than an employees. The company is the company from the chairman all the way down to the janitor.
Because based on all of their insensitive and dismissive comments in regards to this lawsuit, it's clear they are lying to try and create a shield. Kinda like how racists will say "I'm not racist! I have black friends!". They have posted several incredibly insensitive comments about the people that were sexually harassed at Blizzard. People who are victims of similar situations have compassion towards other potential victims. They don't write them off and defend the people that harassed/assaulted them.
point by point
- Forced arbitration is not entirely necessary. I suspect Blizzard pulls the trigger on it more than they need to making it part of their retaliatory culture. Lots of companies manage disputes without going into forced arbitration (which nearly always favors management).
- I've worked in places where everyone on a team has a chance to speak with potential candidates for the team and a collective decision is made. It works well. In cases where a team decision is not feasible at least everyone gets heard.
- Posting narrow ranges of pay for certain positions isn't new either. That precludes someone making 50% more than someone else doing the same work.
- Since the employees don't trust management it's not a huge demand that they have a say in who is going to vet management on their behalf. It is on their behalf after all.
There's no need to lock into a "If you don't like then quit" stance. That's frankly dumb, unprofessional, and in a consensus environment like Blizzard's unworkable. The path to diversity isn't instant and contrary to what people are saying it doesn't necessarily involve quotas. It's about expanding opportunity for interns, recruiting in places where you may not be recruiting now, being careful about a culture in which I suspect a lot of people get their opportunities because they know someone. Since the someone's to know are primarily white men then you end up where they are.
Last edited by MoanaLisa; 2021-07-29 at 01:17 AM.
"...money's most powerful ability is to allow bad people to continue doing bad things at the expense of those who don't have it."
I’m specifically referring to your Colin reference. It’s wrong. I don’t give two shits about the Dixie chicks. You are using Colin to preach a narrative, and you are wrong. I don’t believe that either side is without blame (unlike you clearly). You however have some axe to grind on an example that is wrong. It’s as simple as that. I can’t dumb it down any more that.
- - - Updated - - -
So because a person disagrees with you, and doesn’t clearly react to the same situation as you means that their experience wasn’t real or credible. Slippery slope of hypocrisy this judgement.