Cosby was accused before 2014, it just wasn’t as mainstream before then.
I’ve also said in another thread that I’m the type of person who believes things can be taken out of context and that the entire Cosby suite thing could have been an off the cuff joke that just kept getting bigger and bigger. The issue is that the benefit of the doubt thing grows smaller as every person asked gives a different excuse for how it started.
These guys posted a picture of them holding a framed picture of Cosby, called the room the Cosby suite, and Cosby had accusations against him before 2014.
As far as being a nice guy, that doesn’t mean that he knew nothing about what was going on. Plenty of people have been described as nice guys while being complete shits.
As I stated, I’m not saying Greg participated in anything, or even knew; but, there is evidence to suggest he possibly could have.
- - - Updated - - -
But as I posted to another person, Cosby had been accused before that. Not being mainstream doesn’t mean completely unknown. Questioned employees also gave different reasons as to why it was called the Cosby suite, and some of those reasons come across as a complete lie (stating ugly walls that looked like his sweater when the walls were white).
The issue is that the photo shows Greg was obviously in on the joke, and depending on the reason it was actually called the Cosby suite could be pretty damning to him.
As I’ve stated multiple times, I’m not saying Greg had any idea of what was going on, but with the things we know now, such as the photo, being part of group texts, allegations of coworkers pulling Afrasiabi away from women, it’s hard to say he 100% had no idea what was happening.
Look there's a lot of conflicting things out there about the story, and some of them come from the press. And that doesn't help.
For example it isn't clear where the picture came from. Some say it came with the room. Some say these guys brought it with them.
If it came with the room, it's easy to see how they would make some harmless but dumb inside joke about it.
Last edited by zorkuus; 2021-07-30 at 12:34 PM.
I read that story. It was one of the first ones that came out and when discussing it a guild member brought up an interesting point: what hotel puts a photo of a celebrity on the wall? Did they put a photo up of Cosby next to Sandusky?
I’ve tried using Google to find something to counter that point, and I haven’t found anything. If you find something, please let me know because all I can find is celebrities posing at hotels. Nothing with their pictures being in an actual room.
Throw a bucket of shit on a crowd of 1000 people and it’s going to stick to at least some of them.
I see both points, and I don’t think witch hunting is the proper term for this instance. It would have been more accurate if the state of CA went into ActiBlizz with no inkling of what to look for and just looking for anything. They’d be bound to find something on some employees out of how big of a company it is.
That didn’t happen in this case. They were following up on specific allegations. So no witch hunt happened here.
- - - Updated - - -
Which hotel? Proof? Was this a special room? How long ago was this? Anything not anecdotal that can be proven?
Quick search came up with this: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Location...t_England.html
I'm sure there's more. Maybe a bit unusual practise but that doesn't make it non-existant.
Where exactly have you seen the information that the women in question were junior employees, and that they were doing that at the behest of senior employees, though?
Also, not sure if a party in a hotel room after blizzcon is over for the day can be considered a "company event", especially depending on when exactly it happened for which we have no information (might have happened after the party even). Employees are allowed to be friends outside of work, and a group of employees having a party together after blizzcon does not automatically make it a company event in my eyes.
I agree on the potential power inbalance potential issues (although that shouldn't be assumed), and even if they were total strangers not even remotely related to the industry it would still look bad and be pretty questionable. And of course it only looks/sounds worse given the lawsuit.
All I'm saying is that if you look beyond how it looks/sounds like in retrospective, the few alleged facts we know don't really paint a picture that something inherently or purposefully wrong happened there. Is it possible that was the case? Sure. But based on the information I've seen there's really no way to tell without making big assumptions.
People are seeing what they want to see.
Last edited by Kolvarg; 2021-07-30 at 01:08 PM.
https://www.youtube.com/@DoffenGG
Gaming and WoW stuff
I don't doubt that, hotels often have some odd things on the wall.
So, it would in theory be possible that the hotel room had a picture of Bill Cosby on the wall, but people generally don't seem to suggest that it was the origin of the name and the hotel would likely had nailed down the picture more since they don't want their decoration moving around like in the photo.
And the idea that they had the idea to name it the 'Cosby suite' for another reason, and then found a Cosby picture at the hotel just stretches the imagination - and especially that no-one mentioned it.
It also seems that someone else would have confirmed that the specific hotel had a Cosby painting at that time by now.
Now you ask - why does it matter?
Well, this suggest that someone brought a Cosby picture to the hotel suite, and the "Cosby suite" was discussed before hand - indicating that there had been a previous Cosby suite (some have also indicated that was the case). That indicates that someone needs to dig deeper.