You know the Gell-Mann amnesia effect? Game journalism has the most acute case of it of any field because due to the field having no prestige it attracts mostly entry level employees who want to get their foot in the door for other forms of journalism, not any interest in gaming in particular. They might get scoops from publishers to work with and which may be interesting, but that's about it. When it comes to actual analysis, your average player of the game de jour will simply know more by virtue of actually playing it for a much longer time frame than the journo. In this case, the journalist likely has some knowledge of other stories, so he can confidently say that the story sucks dick in comparison to others and he'd be right. However, because he lacks the necessary background in playing this crap for as long as most people on this forum, he can't adequately compare it or bring up where it fails relative to the rest of the franchise's story.