Page 8 of 29 FirstFirst ...
6
7
8
9
10
18
... LastLast
  1. #141
    The Patient vincink's Avatar
    5+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    face.eat(cheese)
    Posts
    345
    Quote Originally Posted by Daedius View Post
    Stocks took a dip to 78 after this announcement... :V
    Leadership changes always precipitate a stock drop in any organization. If it doesn't quickly recover, though, that will be very telling.

  2. #142
    Quote Originally Posted by vincink View Post
    Leadership changes always precipitate a stock drop in any organization. If it doesn't quickly recover, though, that will be very telling.
    The dip could be caused by JAB selling all his shares

  3. #143
    Quote Originally Posted by Zalraki View Post
    The dip could be caused by JAB selling all his shares
    Oh, that reminds me - when he was the president he had to notify the investors whenever he would sell his shares. I guess now he doesn't have to.
    I have enough of EA ruining great franchises and studios, forcing DRM and Origin on their games, releasing incomplete games only to sell day-1 DLCs or spill dozens of DLCs, and then saying it, and microtransactions, is what players want, stopping players from giving EA games poor reviews, as well as deflecting complaints with cheap PR tricks.

    I'm not going to buy any game by EA as long as they continue those practices.

  4. #144
    WoW... After all this they STILL didn't trust a Woman to do it on her own and give her a male to "share" it with. It seems like it would had been a way better look to give it 100% to Jen.

  5. #145
    Quote Originally Posted by cozzri View Post
    I wouldn't rule out the possibility that they are positioning the studio for an IP sell-off / company split to appease stockholders short-term. Having a lead already in place for both sides will make the move more stable.
    I was actually wondering this.. with 2 leaders are they prepping for a studio split of the IPs or even a company spin-off of some sort.
    Member: Dragon Flight Alpha Club, Member since 7/20/22

  6. #146
    I am curious why its co run now, its a bit oddd but either way I find it just funny, was this really a recent choice or planned to deflect heat, its juicy.

  7. #147
    Legendary!
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Not in Europe Anymore Yay
    Posts
    6,931
    Good. Positive change is positive.

  8. #148
    "Look, it doesn't take a genius to know that every organization thrives when it has two leaders. Go ahead, name a country that doesn't have two presidents. A boat that sets sail without two captains. Where would Catholicism be without the popes?"

  9. #149
    Quote Originally Posted by procne View Post
    She surely worked hard, she was a head of another studio. But to jump straight to the head of another studio? In the middle of sexual misconduct scandal?
    I wonder if she accepted the offer happily or did she have to be convinced? I wouldn't take the offer in her place because of how it looks
    Blizzards scake? Candy crush and call of duty make a looooot more money than wow you know.

  10. #150
    Any executive in a position to co-lead the studio has already sold their soul to impress the former mgmt. You can't reach upper mgmt in a megacorp without being an out-of-touch lunatic.

  11. #151
    But...but...his household saint was Gloria Steinem...surely he could appealed to Saint Gloria for help?

  12. #152
    Quote Originally Posted by Neversage View Post
    "Look, it doesn't take a genius to know that every organization thrives when it has two leaders. Go ahead, name a country that doesn't have two presidents. A boat that sets sail without two captains. Where would Catholicism be without the popes?"
    Excellent reference. It also reminds me a sports idiom. If you have 2 quarterbacks it actually means you have no quarterback.

  13. #153
    Old God Soon-TM's Avatar
    5+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Netherstorm
    Posts
    10,842
    Quote Originally Posted by Sorrowseer View Post
    I am curious why its co run now, its a bit oddd but either way I find it just funny, was this really a recent choice or planned to deflect heat, its juicy.
    If it is like other similar situations I've seen, one of them will be the de facto boss and the other will have to play ball or gtfo. Not an ideal arrangement imo, but they (ATVI) are hardly in a position to make ideal arrangements anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by trimble View Post
    WoD was the expansion that was targeted at non raiders.

  14. #154
    F

    by the way...
    "[...] most welcoming workplace possible for women, and people of any gender [...]"

    the mentioning of women is redundant in this sentence as it should be covered by "any gender", right?

  15. #155
    Stood in the Fire GUZ's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    215
    Posts
    499
    So basically next expansion is gonna suck a huge dick but the one after that might be the one lol man what a play tho.
    Blizz power move...Quick! promote the nearest woman(hey you! youre the new boss buttt not fully obvs lul lul) and im glad they did good for her.

  16. #156
    Warchief vsb's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mongoloid
    Posts
    2,166
    Quote Originally Posted by cuafpr View Post
    I was actually wondering this.. with 2 leaders are they prepping for a studio split of the IPs or even a company spin-off of some sort.
    That's a wise thing to do. Woman there is for diversity, not for work.

  17. #157
    Quote Originally Posted by Claymore View Post
    Pretty much spot-on, although I thought he was probably an okay dude; that "you think you want [Classic WoW], but you don't" notwithstanding.
    IMO Classic played out as I predicted it would with most people, it was a huge boon and everyone was in this rat race to the top trying to be the best, once they realized they weren't going to be the first to the top of the mountain they just quit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Claymore View Post
    It's pretty incredibly that there is no one left that anyone has actually HEARD of at the company left to promote. Given that the leadership is going to TWO people, I'm going to be honest, it paints the image that this Jen Oneal may be included just for PR points of "having a woman in leadership", but if they actually had faith of her being an incredible leader, she'd have been given sole reigns. Not saying she ISN'T capable; just that if the board truly believed the was, it would've looked much better having her the sole President.
    I mean people still at the company to promote would be Ion and unfortunately people would have an absolute fit if they did that. At the same time I think hes also smart enough not to take the position in this state as to not crater his career at this point.
    Quote Originally Posted by Claymore View Post
    Either way, it's crazy to think one of the two "co-presidents" has only been with Blizzard a couple of months, while the other, less than three years. Again, could be a tactic to try and save face, to eliminate concerns of "things won't go back to how they were, because these people weren't even HERE when that shit was happening!". Which isn't necessarily wrong, I suppose.
    I don't think these people will be messing with the day-to-day low levels of WoW, it seems like they'll be handling very high level business goals.

  18. #158
    Quote Originally Posted by Moozart View Post
    WoW... After all this they STILL didn't trust a Woman to do it on her own and give her a male to "share" it with. It seems like it would had been a way better look to give it 100% to Jen.
    Yeah just like they didnt trust Brack and had Kaplan as Vice President working with him, and like they didnt trust Morheim and had Metzen as Vice president.

  19. #159
    Blizzard is dead. If this news doesn't open peoples eyes then what will?

    At the head are now people who joined in 2019 and 2021.

    What do they know about Blizzard? They don't have a long history at the company and know the core philosophies. They're just corporate suits.

    Just let the company rest in peace. It was a great ride but it's now it's finished. The end.

  20. #160
    Quote Originally Posted by cozzri View Post
    I wouldn't rule out the possibility that they are positioning the studio for an IP sell-off / company split to appease stockholders short-term. Having a lead already in place for both sides will make the move more stable.
    Please god get them away from Activision, despite all the things that happened culture wise in the blizzard offices the activision model of releasing things like its a sports game franchise is just not it. I'd rather we go longer without new expansions and really let them grow and tell the whole story without having to squeeze things into less than two years.....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •