I'm not suggesting this, at all, but what if Twitter banned her and then Biden or AOC, publicly asked Twitter to unban her......
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
You mean the fake quote you're attributing to me...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
Geez the compulsive "totally not trumper" spiraling another thread out of control. Oh funny, forgot him being nicknamed Machismo Taylor Greene. How fitting.
I'd see that as Biden and AOC not being serious about it, and just wanting to look good, to score political points. Might be a good move, politically, but incredibly shallow in my eyes. I don't see it accomplishing anything beyond that. Certainly not making Twitter unban her.
I'd rather they didn't say a damn thing about it, and just let Twitter do what they want. Their platform, their rules.
Then Twitter should tell Biden or AOC to go pound sand.
Why should politicians have a say in this kind of shit? On either side? This isn't a political decision, in the first place. It's an abusive shitmonger breaking site terms-of-use repeatedly and unapologetically, because she's an malicious, misanthropic idiot. And Twitter saying "nah, GTFO".
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
Didn't call you a name. I commented on your behavior. Endus wasn't acting like an arrogant dick about it.
Regardless, if you don't see that there's a t least some value in Biden or AOC making a symbolic gesture that a person like MTG has to agree with, when their entire fucking platform is built on doing the opposite of what Dems say, then maybe instead of calling a hypothetical stupid, you should look fucking inward.
I guess you can forget the scrambling Desantis had to do because he sat by Biden and was civil. Or what happened with Tuberville and Booker.
But again, totally worthy of your aggressive bullshit.....
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
In a reasonable world, it might generate useful discussion, though I still think they'd be completely wrong to offer that in the first place.
But we live in the Darkest Timeline, where the Democrats could literally put forth the P.U.P.P.I.E.S. bill, the Political Universality of Petting Puppies for Internal Emotional Satisfaction Bill, where the entire bill simply confirmed that, yes, petting a puppy does make most people happy, and the Republicans would be screaming into OANN and Fox News microphones about how Biden was only introducing this bill as a prelude to making everyone eat live puppies once a week or some similarly completely shit-for-brains lie.
There is no possible offer of solidarity or fellowship that Republicans will not misrepresent as a deep attack on American values and a demonstration of exactly how demonic their Democratic nega-colleagues are.
That's why it's a silly question. Not because of what it should mean, with opponents who are reasonable, but the implication that the Republicans in Congress are reasonable. When they clearly are not.
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown