Page 18 of 20 FirstFirst ...
8
16
17
18
19
20
LastLast
  1. #341
    Quote Originally Posted by username993720 View Post
    I've already explained.
    But, if you're so insisting on a single ability, then sure, i guess...
    Right.

    So Heavy Metal could possibly fit the WoW aesthetic, if it's done in moderation like a single ability.

    If you weren't being such a hard-ass about it, we could have concluded this pages ago since we've been literally circling the topic for days just to reach this one point. You can go back to the beginning of the conversation and you'll see this is singular point we've been making for Heavy Metal fitting into the WoW aesthetic, as long as Blizzard is willing integrate Heavy Metal references directly into the lore. It already exists in the game, just not canonically through any class mechanics.
    Last edited by Triceron; 2021-08-26 at 08:20 PM.

  2. #342
    Quote Originally Posted by username993720 View Post
    And why is that?
    We have 12 of them and apparently it's too hard to balance them.

    Adding more would be too much bothersome, so I personally stopped expecting them.

  3. #343
    Pandaren Monk ThatsOurEric's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,992
    Quote Originally Posted by username993720 View Post
    Magic schools is how you pick them?
    I mean classes that do more than physical damage are more numerous than the latter. You already have
    a dedicated Phys Melee Class that doesn't do much (if any) elemental DPS. You also have a Phys Melee
    Ranged Class that is in the same boat, minus maybe one or two elemental abilities.

    So the only route left to go is representation via schools of magic.

  4. #344
    Banned Teriz's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Soul of Azeroth
    Posts
    29,984
    Quote Originally Posted by DatToffer View Post
    We have 12 of them and apparently it's too hard to balance them.

    Adding more would be too much bothersome, so I personally stopped expecting them.
    Has Blizzard ever stated that they have a hard time balancing classes?

  5. #345
    Bards could actually be the holy ranged dps class. That would be way more interesting than another holy spec for priests or pallies.

  6. #346
    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Atia View Post
    I would like to play a support for an alt char - maybe this could also help with some toxic fixations on dps meters lol.
    That's one thing I love about Classic/TBC - everyone is so chill and there isn't such an obsession over dmg meters. Thanks for the bump btw!

    Quote Originally Posted by Prozach View Post
    Thanks for bumping this. It's hilariously awful and lifted right from FF14. No one wants bards any more than they want "tinkers" or whatever. WoW needs class balance not more classes to screw everything up. And certainly not some flute-toting furry skipping through the fight and "healing" them with music.
    Just wanted to let you know I've never played or looked into FF14. Everything was constructed around the idea of an unused "element" of magic found in wow - sound.

    Quote Originally Posted by DatToffer View Post
    Hey guys, we've been having a few instrumental toys in Shadowlands, with brand new musical animations.

    Definitely a sign that Blizzard is preparing something *wink wink*

    I think the next Class will surely be the Bard, hehe.
    That's interesting to know, ty!

    Quote Originally Posted by LarryFromHumanResources View Post

    People hyperfocus on the supportive aspect of Bards which would be neat but definitely wouldn't work in WoW but that doesn't mean that the entire class can't.

    We forget that just because Bards are supportive in other videogames or settings, they don't have to be in WoW since really they're not defined as anything concrete since they don't really exist as a class except maybe in the non-canon TTRPG.

    You could make the argument "Well how would they be Bards if they aren't supports?" to which the response in my eyes would be a question; is the supportive aspect of them really the most interesting or iconic?

    I don't think so.
    Completely agree. I do find it amazing how fixed people are with the idea that Bards are a support class -only-. I don't want nor think Blizzard would ever add a support role to the trio system (tank/heals/dmg) they've had since the inception of the game. My Bard can also do dmg and heal - it's not a crazy concept lol.

    Quote Originally Posted by Flade View Post
    I respect the work you've done on this, but i hope blizzard'll never add an actual bard into WoW, never liked the overall idea of bard nor would it fit into the game itself imho.
    Thanks for the respect and I respect your opinion too. The Bard certainly isn't for everyone but no class is.

    Quote Originally Posted by AKCephalopod View Post

    There's some weird parts with this incarnation of the class though. Some of the passives are really strong. One that really caught my eye is the one that increases xp and honor gains. That alone probably makes bards mandatory in anything but max level content.
    I'm not familiar with retail WoW sadly anymore. I quit near the start of BFA. I disagree that a class that increases xp gains would matter much. How important is honor to the PvP scene?

    Another is there's no mention of lorewalkers at all, which are the bards we already have in WoW. They're wandering storytellers who sometimes play instruments. Those are the bards we're looking for and bringing a major lore character, like Lorewalkers Cho in as a representative of the class is well needed.
    To me, Loresingers and Lorewalkers are interchangeable. They both accomplish the same thing.
    Finally, I have issues with the healer spec. While I like the way the resource works generally, I really don't like the lack of mana on the healer. All healers are built around the idea of mana as their limiting resource. Many items specifically for healers help with their mana management. This spec lacks that, and while their charisma generation looks to have had some effort in addressing this, I'd really just like to see the healer spec modified to use mana. You could even have them use a lot of mana per ability and when they get all the charms and activate Allure, they'd get a huge boost to mana regen.
    For the Minstrel Bard spec, Charisma is simply mana but renamed. It would function exactly like mana does for other healers in retail however that is, haha.

    Overall, it's a cool concept, but I think it'd need some modifications to be useable on live. I'll probably come back to this later and give a more thorough review of the abilities, since this is something I'm really interested in.
    I would -love- -love- -love- any suggestions and especially a full ability/spec review!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Coals View Post
    I think power infusion kind of shows how a buff class wouldn't work well in wow. To many moving parts that single cd already causes issues.
    There are many buff/support abilities in current WoW, are there not? Does Windfury Totem not exist anymore? For my concept, I tried to make -most- buff abilities random in their application. You can't fight over or hog what's completely random! haha.

    Quote Originally Posted by deviantcultist View Post
    A dying game that lacks cool archetypes can't afford to add joke classes. If I'm wrong, guess that speaks volumes for those who still support this. Imagine not having a Void class or Night Warrior/Dark Ranger not being playable and getting a freaking support Bard class or an Engineer instead.
    You underestimate the power of my BARD!

    Quote Originally Posted by DatToffer View Post
    The NECROMANCER of course
    Quote Originally Posted by Triceron View Post
    The OP has a Necromancer class concept in his sig
    Thanks Trice! Yes, DatToffer, please check out my Necromancer concept, too! I'd love your feedback on it!

    Quote Originally Posted by DatToffer View Post
    I don't want a Bard made up of abilities from bards of other games.

    I want Bards like ETC, with guitars you can call axes !

    A Rock Spec for DPS with monstrous Riffs.

    A Metal Spec to Tank mobs with a Moshpit ability.

    And a Jazz Spec to heal your allies with smooth melodies.


    This is way more silly than the usual Bard archetypes, but at least it's Warcraft silly.
    I would certainly incoporate some of that punk and rock flare within talents if I was ever inclined to make them like I did for my Necromancer concept.

    Quote Originally Posted by Askyl View Post
    Bards would fit perfectly in WoW and I really hope they come, that'd bring me back.
    Thank you!

    Quote Originally Posted by Kyphael View Post
    This is amazing, and I hope it happens. 10/10

    Blizzard devs, if you're reading this, STOP ACTING INAPPROPRIATELY AND DO SOMETHING GOOD FOR A CHANGE.
    TYSM!

    Quote Originally Posted by PolarityER View Post
    Ngl, I did not read all of this, but from what I did read it looks really fun. I would probably consider coming back and at least trying it out.
    I'd love a full review if you find the time! Thank you for looking at what you did, though!

    Quote Originally Posted by Bloomer View Post
    I think the whole "bard as a class" concept is dumb, but I'd be lying if I didn't like the "Loresong" spells you came up with.
    The Loresinger spec was definitely the hardest for me. I knew only that I wanted it to work a bit like a summoner of sorts. I had a eureka moment when I came up with the "loresong" term, haha. Then deciding which lore figures would be the most appealing was the next step. I found that cool picture of Arthas and Illidan side by side, and then I plugged in Gul'dan at the bottom of them. It worked perfectly! lol

    Quote Originally Posted by MyWholeLifeIsThunder View Post
    The mechanics look very interesting, but the class fantasy itself just doesn't mash well with WoW, specially the idea that there's like a cosmic necessity for their role. It just seems unnecessary, and the Magician spec really doesn't fit in that whole backstory.

    I like the idea of sound magic and harmonics, Bastion already touches a lot on those aspects, but yeah, I can't get past the set up that we need the power of music to destroy Murmur.
    If you look again at my class/expansion theme section, you'll see that the people of Azeroth aren't exactly sure what's causing the maddening sounds and attacks. They think that something like Murmur is nearing their world. Murmur is really insanely powerful if you looked into his lore, and his beginnings are an absolute mystery. My Magician spec is also capable of song and sound through their general class abilities. I could however reason though that the visual spectacle of their craft also has a cleansing attribute for the maddening sickness.

    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Once again showcasing that Bards add nothing to the game. We already have multiple classes providing this buff, and we have other classes that provide other buffs.
    Whaattt?! A class that uses song and elemental sound to heal and deal dmg, with the power to summon figures from WoW lore to be your guardian, and a melee arcane spec brings nothing to the game?! I couldn't disagree more!

    He’s a Lorewalker, not a Bard. He’s more like a Pandaren librarian. People here are advocating for the guys playing lutes and wearing puffy outfits.
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post

    Also Bards aren’t only musicians. They’re also storytellers and entertainers.
    Indeed.

  7. #347
    Quote Originally Posted by Amunrasonther View Post
    If you look again at my class/expansion theme section, you'll see that the people of Azeroth aren't exactly sure what's causing the maddening sounds and attacks. They think that something like Murmur is nearing their world. Murmur is really insanely powerful if you looked into his lore, and his beginnings are an absolute mystery. My Magician spec is also capable of song and sound through their general class abilities. I could however reason though that the visual spectacle of their craft also has a cleansing attribute for the maddening sickness.
    It's just more the whole set up that there's a whole cosmic and dire reason that why Bards must come together what doesn't sit well with me I think.

  8. #348
    Quote Originally Posted by DatToffer View Post
    We have 12 of them and apparently it's too hard to balance them.

    Adding more would be too much bothersome, so I personally stopped expecting them.
    Yet, they are the biggest selling point of an expansion and are crucial for the enjoyment of the game (as they are literally what defines your character).

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatsOurEric View Post
    I mean classes that do more than physical damage are more numerous than the latter. You already have
    a dedicated Phys Melee Class that doesn't do much (if any) elemental DPS. You also have a Phys Melee
    Ranged Class that is in the same boat, minus maybe one or two elemental abilities.

    So the only route left to go is representation via schools of magic.
    There's no melee arcane archetype in lore that i know of.
    Holy spell dps would be the Discipline Priest or a 4th Paladin spec.
    There's no melee fire archetype in lore that i know of except for Shamans.

    Class additions are more than just missing magic school classes.
    They are usually based on missing famous archetypes like the Death Knight, Monk and Demon Hunter.

  9. #349
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Has Blizzard ever stated that they have a hard time balancing classes?
    You don't need to make a statement on their inability to balance them.

    Quote Originally Posted by username993720 View Post
    Yet, they are the biggest selling point of an expansion and are crucial for the enjoyment of the game (as they are literally what defines your character).
    Good. Remind them of that.

    And while you're at it both of you, don't forget to show them your thesis about how Tinker is the sole possible class to be released next. I'm pretty sure they'd be glad to know that.

  10. #350
    Banned Teriz's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Soul of Azeroth
    Posts
    29,984
    Quote Originally Posted by DatToffer View Post
    You don't need to make a statement on their inability to balance them.
    Except class imbalance has always been an issue and they've added classes anyway.

    Further, if imbalance was a hinder on game design, Blizzard wouldn't reset multiple classes each expansion.


    And while you're at it both of you, don't forget to show them your thesis about how Tinker is the sole possible class to be released next. I'm pretty sure they'd be glad to know that.
    Who said that Tinker is the SOLE possible class next? It's the most likely due to it having the same pedigree as the previous three expansion classes (something NO other class concept currently has).

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Amunrasonther View Post
    Indeed.
    I do think a more plausible Bard class would be the more Librarian/Storyteller concept than the musical based one. Deckard Cain in HotS is probably the most serious Bard-like character Blizzard has ever made, and unlike the standard Bard concept, I can see a class with Cain's abilities actually working within WoW's trinity system.

  11. #351
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Who said that Tinker is the SOLE possible class next? It's the most likely due to it having the same pedigree as the previous three expansion classes (something NO other class concept currently has).
    That's pretty much your discourse when you come crap on every class concept to ever open in this here place.

  12. #352
    Banned Teriz's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Soul of Azeroth
    Posts
    29,984
    Quote Originally Posted by DatToffer View Post
    That's pretty much your discourse when you come crap on every class concept to ever open in this here place.
    Well some concepts simply don't make sense given Blizzard's history of class inclusion. It's rather hard to believe that Blizzard would introduce a Bard class into WoW when they have shown close to zero interest in such a concept for multiple decades now.

  13. #353
    Correct me if I am wrong but didn't power infusion alone already kind of fuck up the game as a single dps cooldown at the highend?

    The idea of making a buff based class seems utterly disastrous.

  14. #354
    Quote Originally Posted by Sin of Pride View Post
    Correct me if I am wrong but didn't power infusion alone already kind of fuck up the game as a single dps cooldown at the highend?

    The idea of making a buff based class seems utterly disastrous.
    Which is precisely why Shaman and Paladin were gutted.

    As much as I love - and prefer - the Support playstyle, Blizzard doesn't want that in WoW. Period. They made the decision to not have that playstyle in their game two decades ago, and built the game for the next two decades on the trinity. You can't inject another corner without upending the rest of the game.

    This is why, as much as I absolutely love Bard, I don't want them in WoW. Even if they fit in thematically, or could easily carve out their own space, there is no place for them mechanically. Any implementation would be a mockery. I don't want them to do to Bard right out of the gate what they did to Shaman.

  15. #355
    The last thing we need is another melee spec for the 3 raid spot and permanent ranged favoring raid design. Turn their third spec into a tank.

    Otherwise nice job but mehhhh idea, i don't see how it belongs in the WoW universe.

    Also if they balance it around the supporting buffs then it will be a shitty dps/healer to compensate, see FFXIV where bard is a joke

  16. #356
    Quote Originally Posted by Sin of Pride View Post
    Correct me if I am wrong but didn't power infusion alone already kind of fuck up the game as a single dps cooldown at the highend?

    The idea of making a buff based class seems utterly disastrous.
    Oh god, i hope PI gets reworked and/or removed.
    Error 404 - Signature not found

  17. #357
    Quote Originally Posted by DatToffer View Post
    Good. Remind them of that.

    And while you're at it both of you, don't forget to show them your thesis about how Tinker is the sole possible class to be released next. I'm pretty sure they'd be glad to know that.
    Oh, don't worry. I'm not a fanatic like the other guy. I believe that other classes would be added as well.

  18. #358
    Moderator Aucald's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Epic Premium
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA-US
    Posts
    45,795
    This is not a thread about a potential Tinker class, so let's drop the irrelevant and derailing back-and-forth and return to the actual topic of the thread.
    "We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

  19. #359
    To the OP:

    This is remarkable. Best fan-created class concept I have EVER seen. Blizzard should take notice.

  20. #360
    Bards don't need to be support to exist you know. They can "support" their team with heals on one spec and dps on the other two.

    Just because other games or DnD made them that way doesn't mean that is the only way they can be. Do something new and unique instead of copying how other games make it work.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •