Then why on Earth are you whinging about a lack of evidence.
Oh, so you admit you were lying when you said I was asking the government to "control speech", huh? Lol.
Okay, and?
Nah, it's not, or else website moderation or filtering spam wouldn't be legally permissible. You're not asking for speech, you're asking to be entitled to an audience.
Thus admitting that cutting down on misinformation is not incompatible with free speech, as the Hustler v. Falwell ruling was fairly explicit about.
Citizens United existing does not make common law not a thing, so not sure why you're saying this.
You asked me what the law
is, that does not mean it
ought not to be changed.