"They are POISONING THE GAME"
"How?"
"They are changing names and references away from overtly on the nose sex/dick jokes"
"Ummm......how is that going to kill the game?"
"YOU DONT UNDERSTAND -- THESE PEOPLE WILL KILL THE GAME"
- - - Updated - - -
Laugh at you. So how many years do they need to change the game if you want to set up artificial goalposts?
Would be interesting to see the new team produce their own game and try and compete with WoW.
Guess that would be unfair.
Oh well, they can still milk work of others and call the creators trash, while removing all references to them.
There's always that part of audience, that will stay anyway, no matter what you do with the game. Very reliable guys.
Sunk cost fallacy can be cruel, doubly so if it's 15 years in question.
They change the theme of the game slowly over time. Every concession leads to another and then another. You can look at past trends in this game alone. The game has gotten lighter in overall tone since cata. The writing has been edited and changed to the point characters are being retroactively changed to be made misunderstood.
I admit it takes seeing a bigger picture beyond your limited perception but we are already in the middle of its effects.
"Lighter in tone". Yes, because the story tones of Mists of Pandaria, WoD, Legion, and BFA were all so light in tone amidst stories of war, conquest, war crimes, and genocide.
That sounds like fake outrage.
"People that disagree with me must be from Reddit". You said 4 years isnt enough, how many years is okay with you?
Last edited by TidalConflux; 2021-10-03 at 02:25 PM.
I find it funny that those who proclaim to be all for removing these things for being cringy and "puerile" also seem to be rushing to the defense of a story that speeds more towards being a third-rate copy of the Marvel Cinematic Universe in a Warcraft skin with every passing patch.
Probably more than what in game company terms makes you a baby. 4 years means around end of Legion start to mid BfA time just off the top of my head.
One, max one and a half expansions of being part of a development team doesn't actually make me feel comfortable about your respect for the game.
Remember the 90s when christian conservatives were going on tirades about certain kinds of music, and moms (and the media in general) worried about kids becoming violent (and pervs) because entertainment - including video games - had lots of violence and sex?
Hop on over to today, and we see the removal of language and imagery because it'll foster a bigoted society, really just have an "-ist" of your choice.
I wonder how it feels to become modern day puritans.
@TidalConflux https://www.nme.com/news/gaming-news...lhalla-2814871 , remember this one?
Any shoe fitters? Any at all?
- - - Updated - - -
No it's different because ackchually this time it is true uhm.. JUST BECAUSE, OK?
When those icky sticky conservatives did it it was bad, dumb, oppressive and conspiratorial, but now it's good and smart and empathetic because it's my team doing it.
So you're saying it's a process that started before a lot of these devs started working on WoW and was probably spearheaded by some of the original devs to match their own changing attitudes and those of society? Wasn't it Chris Metzen who wanted Sylvanas changed so she wasn't going into battle with her belly exposed?
They're not large, but they compound. It's not one small change, two small changes. It's one minor patch and we already have a laundry list of, let's be honest, mostly innocuous stuff being removed or altered. A "your momma" joke, really?
I don't think many people had a problem with the removal of Afrasiabi stuff. I had slight issues with Mac Aree because I felt like Makari would've been a better change and require less work, but overall, those were changes I could understand.
Turning a painting into fruit, or changing an innuendo that is also a Diablo reference is just silly to me, and clearly people cared enough to want and get it changed- a few of them, as we just covered, even came out and admitted that they were the ones to push for these changes.
Point being, this doesn't happen in a vacuum. We don't just see the removal of one piece of quest text, we see the removal of a bunch of stuff in the same patch for at this point honestly clear ideological reasons. It's disappointing.
No, because I didnt follow the news of AC: Valhalla religiously and thought the game was terrible and boring. From the article, the outrage seems dumb though -- since the character is a fully helmed character who serves as a boss for the fight. The change doesnt affect the bad gameplay.
Is the change dumb? Sure. Does it affect your overall enjoyment of the game? No. Should it? No.
See, I dont see it that way -- I feel like thats just boxing at shadows where there isnt anything there. It may be disappointing to see the changes made, but it isnt going to affect my overall enjoyment of the game (whether positive or negative).
Last edited by TidalConflux; 2021-10-03 at 02:43 PM.
Yeah it really is... classic dealt with war crimes and children being tortured and went into detail about...hell they lobotomized people to permanently make them living slaves never mind naxx lore.
I admit my memories of tbc are dodgy but you can see them changing it right now.
I always find it weird for something to happen then immediately people claim it wont happen...
- - - Updated - - -
Why do you think I care about the opinions of devs? I don't want things I enjoy constantly being made infantile. I couldn't give two shits about what the code monkey wants.