1. #21921
    Cant wait until a black guy shots like 3 white people at a protest.. one of them in the back.. and we see the trail.. oh..

    wait..

    We will only see the video of him getting killed by the police.

  2. #21922
    Quote Originally Posted by rrayy View Post
    Another far left radical tactic. Use the name Trump. Trump is irrelevant here, I never even brought up his name, and for the record, I never voted for him. And with how hard you are blindly defending Biden here, you are certainly showing your own cultish devotion to him.

    BTW, MSNBC and CNN were far more cultishly devoted to Obama than anyone is to Trump so another lie by you.
    Because the video is literally Chris Wallace asking Trump a question...in a debate between him and Biden.

    Though I see your strange obsession with MSNBC and CNN is still going strong.

  3. #21923
    Quote Originally Posted by Low Hanging Fruit View Post
    Cant wait until a black guy shots like 3 white people at a protest.. one of them in the back.. and we see the trail.. oh..

    wait..

    We will only see the video of him getting killed by the police.
    shot in the back after being shot and falling while actively trying to murder kyle. not shot in the back retreating.

    the white people would have to be violent criminals attacking him unprovoked in the first place. if that was the case, it would be no different and the cops would react the same. considering white people are killed more often by police, it would only be beneficial to not be white.

  4. #21924
    Minorities and liberals need to understand the solution...

    Arm yourselves, and make white conservatives uncomfortable in the process. If anyone would have shot Rittenhouse that night, they would have been able to claim self defense, as well. It was chaos that night, so there was enough gray area for Rittenhouse (a white supremacist) to get away with anything.

    If you are going to be at a protest or rally, be armed.
    Last edited by Machismo; 2021-11-20 at 02:53 AM.

  5. #21925
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    Minorities and liberals need to understand the solution...

    Arm yourselves, and make white conservatives uncomfortable in the process. If anyone would have shot Rittenhouse that night, they would have been able to claim self defense, as well. It was chaos that night, so there was enough gray area for Rittenhouse (a white supremacist) to get away with anything.

    If you are going to be at a protest or rally, be armed.
    except all evidence shows he was not an aggressor, and was violently attacked by psychopaths. videos of kyle running away from these criminals. the only victim in this is kyle. the only thing he got away with, was protecting his own life from scumbags.

  6. #21926
    Quote Originally Posted by The Oblivion View Post
    except all evidence shows he was not an aggressor, and was violently attacked by psychopaths. videos of kyle running away from these criminals. the only victim in this is kyle. the only thing he got away with, was protecting his own life from scumbags.
    Funny, we have him on video weeks before saying he wanted to get armed, and shoot people.

    In the end, if someone comes upon a scene with a man shooting someone else, that person is reasonably allowed to shoot him to prevent harm to others. So yes, any bystander could have shot Rittenhouse, and claimed self defense (or defense of others).

    If you are going to a protest or rally, be armed.

  7. #21927
    Quote Originally Posted by The Oblivion View Post
    shot in the back after being shot and falling while actively trying to murder kyle. not shot in the back retreating.

    the white people would have to be violent criminals attacking him unprovoked in the first place. if that was the case, it would be no different and the cops would react the same. considering white people are killed more often by police, it would only be beneficial to not be white.
    Oh one of these guys.

    sieg heil or whatever you say to each other.

  8. #21928
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    Funny, we have him on video weeks before saying he wanted to get armed, and shoot people.

    In the end, if someone comes upon a scene with a man shooting someone else, that person is reasonably allowed to shoot him to prevent harm to others. So yes, any bystander could have shot Rittenhouse, and claimed self defense (or defense of others).

    If you are going to a protest or rally, be armed.
    not 1 shred of that video shows kyle. so you literally have a video with a random guy talking. no evidence what so ever it kyle. just as likely to be you in that video as kyle. nice try though.

  9. #21929
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    Spell out the defamation then. It's a fairly high bar to reach, and remember the Covington kid settled with CNN and I'm not so inclined to think Biden would potentially settle.
    open your eyes and ears. plenty of legal experts and lawyers doing that. ignoring it all and demanding specific people point it out to you isn't a good look. just step away from the computer and take a break.
    TO FIX WOW:1. smaller server sizes & server-only LFG awarding satchels, so elite players help others. 2. "helper builds" with loom powers - talent trees so elite players cast buffs on low level players XP gain, HP/mana, regen, damage, etc. 3. "helper ilvl" scoring how much you help others. 4. observer games like in SC to watch/chat (like twitch but with MORE DETAILS & inside the wow UI) 5. guild leagues to compete with rival guilds for progression (with observer mode).6. jackpot world mobs.

  10. #21930
    Quote Originally Posted by The Oblivion View Post
    not 1 shred of that video shows kyle. so you literally have a video with a random guy talking. just as likely to be you in that video as kyle. nice try though.
    Like I said, anyone could have shot Rittenhouse, and been able to claim self defense. After all, he was shooting people.

  11. #21931
    Quote Originally Posted by rrayy View Post
    He didn't cross state lines. The gun was stored in Kenosha. He is free to cross state lines and WIsconsin is an open carry state, so he is free to pick up the gun in Wisconsin and carry it openly.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Oblivion View Post
    there is no charge for crossing state lines. he also open carried the gun legally in the state he was in and never crossed a state line with that gun. review the trial before you speak. he did nothing illegal with the firearm.
    Oh shit, my bad yo. I wasn't talking about the gun at all...with all the HE CROSSED STATE LINES stuff it seems like it's double-plus ungood to go from one state to the other!

  12. #21932
    Quote Originally Posted by Kokolums View Post
    open your eyes and ears. plenty of legal experts and lawyers doing that. ignoring it all and demanding specific people point it out to you isn't a good look. just step awa from the computer and take a break.
    Let's see it.

    Rittenhouse is a white supremacist.

    That's what happens when you hang out with white supremacists, people judge you for your actions.

    Are these the same legal experts that say we have to vote for Nazis, or else we are starting a civil war?

  13. #21933
    Quote Originally Posted by Kokolums View Post
    open your eyes and ears. plenty of legal experts and lawyers doing that.
    Outside of the Covington lawyer guy, who else?

    Lyn Wood? The guy whose biggest accomplishment lately is losing a bunch of insane lawsuits?

  14. #21934
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    Like I said, anyone could have shot Rittenhouse, and been able to claim self defense. After all, he was shooting people.
    sure, but then anyone could shoot someone who is attacking a school shooter trying to stop them too.

    kyle was defending his life against violent criminals. shooting kyle wouldnt be defending yourself from anything, so you would enjoy that fat loss. lmfao

  15. #21935
    Quote Originally Posted by The Oblivion View Post
    sure, but then anyone could shoot someone who is attacking a school shooter trying to stop them too.

    kyle was defending his life against violent criminals. shooting kyle wouldnt be defending yourself from anything, so you would enjoy that fat loss. lmfao
    And Kyle Rittenhouse is a violent white supremacist.

    Yeah, anyone could have shot him in order to protect others and stop more bloodshed.

  16. #21936
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    Minorities and liberals need to understand the solution...Arm yourselves, and make white conservatives uncomfortable in the process.
    Damn...that's dangerously based. Armed minorities are harder to oppress. Hopefully someone teaches the NFAC about trigger discipline though.

  17. #21937
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    And Kyle Rittenhouse is a violent white supremacist.

    Yeah, anyone could have shot him in order to protect others and stop more bloodshed.
    nope, he is an innocent victim of violence. poor guy ran away from these lunatics, try to escape with his life, but the fanatics continued to pursue to do him harm. only as a last resort did he finally defend his own life by using a weapon. thankfully he had it and was able to stop these from taking his life.

    anyone who shot him, would very deservedly, be rotting in jail. you cant just shoot innocent victims.

    person a: school shooter
    person b: employee at school
    person c: violent criminal across the street watching it unfold

    if person a is trying to murder person b, person b stops him, person c doesnt get to kill person b. thats not reality. just your fan fiction .lmfao
    Last edited by The Oblivion; 2021-11-20 at 03:09 AM.

  18. #21938
    Quote Originally Posted by The Oblivion View Post
    nope, he is an innocent victim of violence. poor guy ran away from these lunatics, try to escape with his life, but the fanatics continued to pursue to do him harm. only as a last resort did he finally defend his own life by using a weapon. thankfully he had it and was able to stop these from taking his life.
    And anyone who shot Rittenhouse (a white supremacist) would have been an innocent victim. Clearly, people need to be protected from racist shooters.

  19. #21939
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    79,180
    Quote Originally Posted by rrayy View Post
    Should also be noted that the first one was a complete dodge of the reporter calling him out over calling Rittenhouse a white supremacist. His people should be more concerned with the defimation lawsuit coming his way not to mention the fact the second statement looks completely comical after he already admitted publicly he never followed the trial. He is basically trying to be angered at something he never bothered to pay attention to.
    There aren't going to be any defamation lawsuits, not that go anywhere.

    Defamation can only be argued if there isn't cause for someone to believe a thing to be true. With Rittenhouse, he was photographed palling around with the Proud Boys, a white supremacist terrorist organization. He was also counter-protesting a BLM protest, which only a white supremacist would do. So there's plenty of justifiable grounds to believe he's a white supremacist.

    As for "murderer", there was a trial. He was not exonerated at that trial. If you believe that he was, you don't understand what a "not guilty" verdict is, or what the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard is. It's still fair to call him a murderer. Take a moment to realize that "he probably murdered that dude in cold blood, and probably came to the protests looking for people to kill" should result in a "not guilty" jury verdict if their certainty is only, say, 90%. That 10% is the "reasonable doubt".

    Rittenhouse is a white supremacist murderer. You think that's "defamation"? Fuckin' sue me. Good freakin' luck with that.
    Last edited by Endus; 2021-11-20 at 03:11 AM.


  20. #21940
    Quote Originally Posted by Machismo View Post
    And anyone who shot Rittenhouse (a white supremacist) would have been an innocent victim. Clearly, people need to be protected from racist shooters.
    nope, they would have murdered someone without cause. sorry, you cant change reality to suit your feefee's

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •