Donald Trump, Michael Flynn, several members of congress.
but you wanted links
From the Top
Trump Boasts He ‘Saved Kenosha,’ Praises Rittenhouse as ‘Brave’ in Fox News Interview
To the bottom
GOP Senate hopeful: 'Mass murderer' Fauci should be jailed and 'American hero' Rittenhouse should walk free
a basic google search would have saved you the humiliation of course I am taking the big leap of faith that you understand the concept of shame.
Last edited by Draco-Onis; 2021-11-21 at 03:56 PM.
Facts there weren't nearly as clear there as they were here, hence Casey was acquitted. That;s called reasonable doubt. It's what the facts are, not what you spin them to be. You don't get to make up what the law is to suit your needs.
The far left bully mob doesn't want to follow the law. They want to make their own up as they go along to go after and eliminate whoever they want.
MMO-Champ the place where calling out trolls get you into more trouble than trolling.
Nice fantasy. None of this you can back up with facts. Meanwhile it's common consensus that the longer a jury takes that tougher it was to reach a verdict.
- - - Updated - - -
two congressmen have offered him jobs. No application, no interview.
Which you know. Who is lying now?
- - - Updated - - -
And the minor was still in a possession of an illegally obtained weapon which was used to kill people. There should be consequences on both sides to that.
Man you really worship this guy huh? I'm sure in your fantasy Rittenhouse just coincidently gave someone a wad of cash at the same time they coincidently gave him a gun. No buying here, no sir.
- - - Updated - - -
Care to show me where they jury reached a not guilty verdict on weapon charges?
They didnt, it was removed because the barrel size made it legal for him to carry it, not own it. Its kinda easy to explain if you are 16, you cant own any rifle, however its not illegal for you to go hunt with it. If you kill someone with it, the person in trouble for the gun is gona be your dad the owner, you the 16 years old will be responsible for who you killed.
Now you can argue the laws are shit, but thats a different discussion. The point is dont give kids stuff they cant legal own or buy.
Last edited by minteK917; 2021-11-21 at 04:19 PM.
Dude, just stop. You're embarrassing yourself with your complete lack of understanding when it comes to matters of law.
Nothing was "conclusively proven". The best you have is that, per Wisconsin's shit laws and the judge's malfeasance, the jury was not able to perfectly disprove self-defense. In no way does this verdict mean that Rittenhouse is innocent. That's simply not the way it works.
And for the umpteenth time, of course the verdict was unanimous; it has to be, by definition.
Black is only facing state felony charges so far, and they're apparently not related to the actual sale of the firearm. Those crimes are federal, and both parties can still be charged with them.
That doesn't absolve Rittenhouse. He's still guilty of conspiracy to violate federal law, which is a crime. He absolutely could be charged in connection with the 100% illegal purchase of the rifle.
Again, both parties have literally admitted this crime, in full, under testimony.
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils
Not fantasy. It was all out there. You had fat left nuts including politicos threatening vkiolene if an acquittal occurred. Hell, you literally had a MSNBC reporter stalk the jury bus. The only fantasy is the far left mob trying to act like everything they did never happened and act innocent after the fact.
So now a job offer made as a political stunt solely to get attention = calling someone a role model? That is beyond a complete stretch. The only one lying is still you.two congressmen have offered him jobs. No application, no interview.
Which you know. Who is lying now?
You still didn't list any crimes Rittenhouse committed. He was legally able to possess the gun and was found not guilty on all charges. The law is the law. This isn't mob rule. You don't get to make them up as you go along to suit an agenda.And the minor was still in a possession of an illegally obtained weapon which was used to kill people. There should be consequences on both sides to that.
- - - Updated - - -
Nope. I deal with the facts and laws as written. You want to enforce mob ruie by completely ignoring the laws and facts while making up your own. And again, all the adult had to do was say "No I can't because I cannot purchase it legally". The mental gymnastics you are using to twist this to punish a guy is staggering.
They threw the charge out because he was legally allowed to carry it under the law.Care to show me where they jury reached a not guilty verdict on weapon charges?
- - - Updated - - -
Wisconsin is a big hunting state, so a number of the gun laws regarding minors were written with this in mind. The idea is that the minor would be ale to use the gun while hunting in the woods with an adult present. Now the judge did say the law was too vague, so the Wisconsin legislature will have to clean that up to be specifically clear on what is legal.
Last edited by rrayy; 2021-11-21 at 06:13 PM.
That's... exactly what it is.
Aww, you can ignore the many times it's been posted, but you're still wrong, and I'll still correct you, champ. He might have been legally allowed to carry a rifle similar to the one he was carrying, but the actual rifle he was carrying was an illegally purchased rifle, for which he can face federal charges.
Your ignorance of the law and how it's implemented is well-documented at this point. Perhaps don't dig this hole any deeper?
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils
the fantasy part is where that caused the 24 hours of deliberations. You have zero proof of that.
uh. Yes? Last I checked people don't offer jobs with no application or interview to people they think are delinquents. The one stretching here is you.So now a job offer made as a political stunt solely to get attention = calling someone a role model?
no he wasn't.He was legally able to possess the gun
none of which included weapon chargesand was found not guilty on all charges.
YOu have zero proof of any of you fantasies,and the threats of violence if an acquittal is reached is on social media no matter how ,much you isist it didn't happen.
Wow this is not even remotely an argument. Offering someone a job does not = calling someone a role model. Just stop.uh. Yes? Last I checked people don't offer jobs with no application or interview to people they think are delinquents. The one stretching here is you.
yes he was. That is why the charge was thrown out. Stop lying.no he wasn't.
Because the gun charge was thrown out. He was ruled to have been legally able to possess the gun.none of which included weapon charges
Last edited by rrayy; 2021-11-21 at 07:30 PM.
No, this is a right-wing fiction.
A Congressional internship is not just "a job". It's a sign of support of the future of the intern by the Congressperson.
The state charge was unrelated to the reason why he was in illegal possession of the rifle. Keep up.
No, he was ruled to have been not unable to carry the firearm, which was the charge. The firearm was still illegal, and he was still in illegal possession according to federal laws.
I'm getting the sense that you've put me on ignore now, because you keep getting schooled. You never admitted that you were either lying or just laughably wrong about Rittenhouse being sued.
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils