1. #1941
    The Insane draynay's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    18,816
    Fuckin Chargers are Chargering the hell out of this one.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Incredible comeback followed by incredible collapse.
    /s

  2. #1942
    Fluffy Kitten Pendulous's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Treno
    Posts
    19,502
    Incredibly stupid decision to go on 4th down at your own 30, late in a tie game. The fact they pulled it out is very anti-Chargers.

    So who are the best teams this week? Chiefs made a functional defense out of thin air, now leading the AFC west again. Pats are gonna Pat it up and remind everyone they're still around. Cards are rolling with Colt freaking McCoy. Green Bay is still dangerous.

  3. #1943
    Quote Originally Posted by Pendulous View Post
    Incredibly stupid decision to go on 4th down at your own 30, late in a tie game. The fact they pulled it out is very anti-Chargers.
    You mean the one that then showed the numbers backing it as the correct choice? Punting putting them more likely to lose the game, failing to get the conversion did the same thing, however getting that first down was an increase in chances to win. You're going to see more teams going for it on 4th down as you have already seen this year, many times it is the CORRECT CHOICE. Now this does not factor personnel you have in the game so some teams are less likely to be able to convert, but in a game like that where the Chargers gained 400 yards, I totally think it was the right call.

  4. #1944
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyanion View Post
    You mean the one that then showed the numbers backing it as the correct choice? Punting putting them more likely to lose the game, failing to get the conversion did the same thing, however getting that first down was an increase in chances to win. You're going to see more teams going for it on 4th down as you have already seen this year, many times it is the CORRECT CHOICE. Now this does not factor personnel you have in the game so some teams are less likely to be able to convert, but in a game like that where the Chargers gained 400 yards, I totally think it was the right call.
    100% agree. This is probably what you're referencing on the percentages: https://twitter.com/NextGenStats/sta...39129817190401

    Granted--there's probably some arguments to be had on playcalling (on top of other items you mentioned), but it was the right call.

  5. #1945
    This week might be the last one with a Broncos win until the off season, extended both Tim Patrick and Courtland Sutton. Now they just need to find a QB that isn't terrible, any other ST coordinator and an OC that is better than Ask Madden. Oh, and get an owner so Joe Ellis can get shot into the sun along with Pat Shurmur and Tom McMahon.

  6. #1946
    The Lightbringer ProphetFlume's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,942
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyanion View Post
    You mean the one that then showed the numbers backing it as the correct choice? Punting putting them more likely to lose the game, failing to get the conversion did the same thing, however getting that first down was an increase in chances to win. You're going to see more teams going for it on 4th down as you have already seen this year, many times it is the CORRECT CHOICE. Now this does not factor personnel you have in the game so some teams are less likely to be able to convert, but in a game like that where the Chargers gained 400 yards, I totally think it was the right call.
    I agree with the decision, idk about the play call.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gumboy View Post
    I'm not sure if you guys have noticed but sometimes I say things that are kind of dumb
    Quote Originally Posted by draynay View Post
    I just like reading about the "vigorous rubbing" that might affect ball inflation.

  7. #1947
    Quote Originally Posted by ProphetFlume View Post
    I agree with the decision, idk about the play call.
    Yeah that is a whole other discussion in itself haha

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Espo View Post
    100% agree. This is probably what you're referencing on the percentages: https://twitter.com/NextGenStats/sta...39129817190401

    Granted--there's probably some arguments to be had on playcalling (on top of other items you mentioned), but it was the right call.
    I’d love to see the numbers on the Saints choice to field goal down by 14 with 7 mins left and 4th and goal

  8. #1948
    Taysom Hill signs a base $40m contract for his "current role" which can go up to $95m depending on whether he becomes the starting QB.

    I still don't get it. Taysom Hill isn't good. Why would anyone pay him $40m for anything? It's a 4 year extension, is Taysom Hill a $10m a year player? WTF.

  9. #1949
    Quote Originally Posted by eschatological View Post
    Taysom Hill signs a base $40m contract for his "current role" which can go up to $95m depending on whether he becomes the starting QB.

    I still don't get it. Taysom Hill isn't good. Why would anyone pay him $40m for anything? It's a 4 year extension, is Taysom Hill a $10m a year player? WTF.
    I mean I think he is good and love watching him play. Being a Saints fan I’m happy to hear about this deal. I wish he was used more in those roles if he isn’t the QB though.

  10. #1950
    I hate reading these Packers/Vikings after game headlines. Bleh.

  11. #1951
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyanion View Post
    Yeah that is a whole other discussion in itself haha

    - - - Updated - - -


    I’d love to see the numbers on the Saints choice to field goal down by 14 with 7 mins left and 4th and goal
    In a vacuum, this one didn't look quite as egregious from a pure numbers perspective; but when you apply a little bit of logic it is such a terrible call.

    https://twitter.com/ben_bot_baldwin/...25169491185665

    Basically...they had a 3% chance to win at the start of that play

    A FG had a 97% probability of succeeding and would have increased their win % by....0. Yes, zero.

    A conversion had a 31% probability of succeeding and would have increased their win probability by 9%. Edit: the 9% increase is just for converting the 4th down (it was actually 4th and 7--not goal). It doesn't even factor in the increase if they scored a TD afterward (I can't imagine this doesn't swing it by at least 20-30%+)

    So Sean Payton chose the option that had a 0% increase to his win probability when he was already at 3%. Brilliant.
    Last edited by Espo; 2021-11-23 at 12:23 AM.

  12. #1952
    Quote Originally Posted by Espo View Post
    In a vacuum, this one didn't look quite as egregious from a pure numbers perspective; but when you apply a little bit of logic it is such a terrible call.

    https://twitter.com/ben_bot_baldwin/...25169491185665

    Basically...they had a 3% chance to win at the start of that play

    A FG had a 97% probability of succeeding and would have increased their win % by....0. Yes, zero.

    A conversion had a 31% probability of succeeding and would have increased their win probability by 9%. Edit: the 9% increase is just for converting the 4th down (it was actually 4th and 7--not goal). It doesn't even factor in the increase if they scored a TD afterward (I can't imagine this doesn't swing it by at least 20-30%+)

    So Sean Payton chose the option that had a 0% increase to his win probability when he was already at 3%. Brilliant.
    I LOVE statistics like these. Its so fun.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Espo View Post
    So Sean Payton chose the option that had a 0% increase to his win probability when he was already at 3%. Brilliant.
    We talk about this kind of play a lot on this forum. I feel like coaches only choose that option if they know they are going to lose and just want to minimize the score differential. They are hoping on some kind of freak plays instead of just having faith their team can convert on 4th.

    - - - Updated - - -

    How does Tom Brady consistently have one of the easier SoS. Just good luck I guess.

  13. #1953
    The Lightbringer ProphetFlume's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,942
    Anyone understand why mnf is free with the mobile nfl app but not with the app using a fire stick?
    Quote Originally Posted by Gumboy View Post
    I'm not sure if you guys have noticed but sometimes I say things that are kind of dumb
    Quote Originally Posted by draynay View Post
    I just like reading about the "vigorous rubbing" that might affect ball inflation.

  14. #1954
    The Insane draynay's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    18,816
    Quote Originally Posted by eschatological View Post
    Taysom Hill signs a base $40m contract for his "current role" which can go up to $95m depending on whether he becomes the starting QB.

    I still don't get it. Taysom Hill isn't good. Why would anyone pay him $40m for anything? It's a 4 year extension, is Taysom Hill a $10m a year player? WTF.
    Meanwhile Marcus Williams still hasn't been extended.
    /s

  15. #1955
    Immortal Vetali's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    7,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Lemonpartyfan View Post
    I LOVE statistics like these. Its so fun.
    Theres some good bots out there that show go for it/kick it as well.

    https://twitter.com/ben_bot_baldwin

    https://twitter.com/surrender_index

    Quote Originally Posted by ProphetFlume View Post
    Anyone understand why mnf is free with the mobile nfl app but not with the app using a fire stick?
    If you have verizon it allows you to stream off the NFL app on your phone iirc. Can't cast it though, which sucks.

  16. #1956
    Quote Originally Posted by Vetali View Post
    Theres some good bots out there that show go for it/kick it as well.

    https://twitter.com/ben_bot_baldwin

    https://twitter.com/surrender_index

    If you have verizon it allows you to stream off the NFL app on your phone iirc. Can't cast it though, which sucks.
    Surrender index calls them cowardly punts, I am DYING lol

  17. #1957
    Quote Originally Posted by draynay View Post
    Meanwhile Marcus Williams still hasn't been extended.
    WNY is in a panic that we might lose to an injured Trevor Simien on Thursday. We basically have to win out at this point. Gotta at least split with the Patriots.

  18. #1958
    Matt LaFleur said they will absolutely not replace Mason Crosby. Its heartwarming to see them support him, I hope he fixes some of these issues (I don't blame all the misses on him, some were massive wind issues etc)

  19. #1959
    Quote Originally Posted by ProphetFlume View Post
    Anyone understand why mnf is free with the mobile nfl app but not with the app using a fire stick?
    Didn’t know about that app though thanks!

  20. #1960
    The Undying Slowpoke is a Gamer's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    World of Wisconsin
    Posts
    37,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Lemonpartyfan View Post
    Matt LaFleur said they will absolutely not replace Mason Crosby. Its heartwarming to see them support him, I hope he fixes some of these issues (I don't blame all the misses on him, some were massive wind issues etc)
    I mean can you find someone better this deep into the season anyway?

    I think he absolutely needs competition for next camp though.
    FFXIV - Maduin (Dynamis DC)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •