I very much agree with you here. I hope someday our society will transition away from capitalistic nature. Ironically, climate catastrophe along with UBI might be the gateway to such a monumental shift. Or, it might never happen. That book I keep referencing gave a reasonable fictional "outline" for how it would come to pass.
I agree with your sentiment of a positive future but considering the amount of people in this country that believe monetary worth is the sole factor of a person's value I doubt it'll happen in our lifetimes. As for climate change, there's so many deniers out there gaining traction (we've seen some of them here) that I expect a Fallout-like universe in the lifetimes of our grand children.
“You're not to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or says it.”― Malcolm X
I watch them fight and die in the name of freedom. They speak of liberty and justice, but for whom? -Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway)
Not evading it at all.
All the pressure, coercion, exploitation and persuasion can be placed on you by your employer, but you still have that choice to make and can still make it when it comes to personal safety. Never said it wouldn't come without hardships or negative results. Never said its right.
All that pressure and coercion is not right by any Strech of the imagination and should be eradicated from any work environment when it comes to personal safety 120%. There should be huge penalties for companies that practice these policies. There should be social safety nets to help people who walk away from workplaces like these.
- - - Updated - - -
The sad part they were most likely were once employees just like the ones they are treating like that now.
Unfortunately, what will happen is at the corporate level there will be procedures/rules against this type of behavior/actions. But they ignore it actually happening on the local level and claim "ignorance" that they did not know local managers were doing it. As long as they have a policy against it, they can claim plausible deniability if local operations are caught doing it. Reminds me a lot of companies that hire illegals at the local level and the corporations claim they knew nothing about it.
- - - Updated - - -
I am hopping something less sever that the baby boomer "die off" fixes the massive imbalance and power Florida has.
Buh Byeeeeeeeeeeee !!
Same here. Depending on a number of factors, Florida's "sinking" could be in full swing before the baby boomers start dying off in droves. But we'll more than likely lose the majority of the state before the century is over. Along with many other coastal areas/cities. But Florida is ripe because of it's geography.
But Florida has already flipped blue but the laws allow the minority to keep it republican, I mean they gave felons voting rights but republicans just reversed that. This set up is happening all over the country especially with the big lie where the minority will decide where a state even the country goes. Besides by the time boomers die off or Florida is underwater it will already be far too late than it already is to act.
I heard being homeless this time of year in the US is lovely, they should just have risked that. I mean, with global warming you wont even need to fear the cold!
Is enslavement okay if the masters don't literally beat you?
Is instant death really "worse" than a constant state of suffering and hardship? Because that's the status quo for basically everyone making less than a living wage. And to be clear, that's north of $22/hour, more in big expensive cities. That's a lot of people. They get strung along with false promises and futile hope, and die while serving their masters, as these people did in Kentucky. If they're "lucky", they get to have a poverty-stricken "retirement" once they're too old to labor any more, living off government/family support because they never made enough to develop a retirement fund.
All that so the multi-millionaire who owns their labor can build a third hangar for his growing Learjet fleet, or whatever.
It's really telling when the main arguments against something like a basic income system boil down to "but without the threats of starvation and homelessness, people might have a real choice when it comes to whether or not to work!"
Edit: Before you come back at me again about the use of "slavery", consider this from an economic-system point of view. The "slavery" is in the denial of free choice; that people are made to work, or suffer. It may not be by individual owners, but it is by the economic system itself; capitalism enslaves the workers for the benefit of the owners of the means of production. Broadening that enslavement to a systemic approach rather than individual ownership via chattel slavery isn't really "better".
Last edited by Endus; 2021-12-19 at 05:10 PM.
instead, they risked their lives, for which in return would have the same outcome of their family not only being homeless because they lost that income from the dead employee/family member, but they would also have to now figure out a way to survive without that family member being alive.
I think being alive has a way better odds of actually finding a solution to prevent your family from being homeless than being dead does, unless you think people making 12 bucks an hour can afford life insurance.
Buh Byeeeeeeeeeeee !!