I produced the Israeli study, but honestly the study you posted to prove me wrong did the opposite, since it shows strong natural immunity clearly.
https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2101
Some of the common UK discussion points here, more about weighing up natural immunity and protection vs vaccine side effects that might make you triggered though, but it's the BMJ so have at it.
"Some people think natural immunity matters"But the studies kept coming. A National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded study from La Jolla Institute for Immunology found “durable immune responses” in 95% of the 200 participants up to eight months after infection.13 One of the largest studies to date, published in Science in February 2021, found that although antibodies declined over 8 months, memory B cells increased over time, and the half life of memory CD8+ and CD4+ T cells suggests a steady presence.9
Real world data have also been supportive.14 Several studies (in Qatar,15 England,16 Israel,17 and the US18) have found infection rates at equally low levels among people who are fully vaccinated and those who have previously had covid-19. Cleveland Clinic surveyed its more than 50 000 employees to compare four groups based on history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination status.18 Not one of over 1300 unvaccinated employees who had been previously infected tested positive during the five months of the study.
Edge - Defending this position with his life.
Last edited by Bigbazz; 2022-01-06 at 10:04 PM.
Probably running on a Pentium 4
However, one of the problems with all such studies is that there is a major confounder - the behavior of the individuals.
If someone behaves in a risk-prone way they are more likely to get infected once and also a second time (well, unless they die the first time).
A more risk-averse behavior may cause them to avoid both infections (and get vaccinated).
Additionally those behaviors are somewhat "contagious" as people hang out with like-minded individuals - which makes the difference even more pronounced; so as you later write it's difficult to get reliable conclusions for how much protection they actually provide.
But that just makes it even more important to vaccinate the ones that have been infected.
That checks out.
That article doesn't say that natural immunity is as good, just that it may be good enough.
What the author fails to realize is that the US public health don't seem to like such complicated trade-offs for the common good (the point was to vaccinate the uninfected first since they would benefit more); one can also see that in many countries in Europe that it was one age group followed by another (to prioritize the ones most at risk of dying; so generally from oldest to youngest - but with notable exceptions) whereas that pattern was less clear in the US.
I've heard people use that logic to delay booking a bit, and then later book it in Europe - whereas US posters here have seen to be more individualistic.
There are also multiple risks with such a complicated trade-off (people might forget to get it later) - and it wasn't needed that much in the US: the vaccine rollout was faster than in Europe so there was less need to prioritize.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...id-tests-usps/
US is gearing up to send out 500M test kits to houses across the country, working with USPS. This isn't blind sending, sounds like they'll set up a site where you can request one and the USPS will deliver it directly to your home for free.
Is this what covid leadership looks like? I mean, this is great the way they're handling it. Blind-sending would lead to millions upon millions of tests tossed in the trash or never picked up, and those who will request tests are more likely to have enough brain cells to follow the directions to self test (it's easy, but you'd be surprised how many folks have trouble with it). Should hopefully help a lot of folks self-quarantining at home after possible exposure (got multiple folks in my family in this condition right now, including myself though I'm a third-degree exposure so extremely minimal chance) who can't get outta the house or order one from the store. Also should hopefully net some more data if they report their status into the county etc.
Oh man if I was an anti-vaxxer I would eat this up. It's a gold mine. There's even a movie that comes to mind for the ones who spread the control theories.
Back to reality though. Its good. I wish the USPC could be used in said capacity more often, but this is good. I could cry and moan about this should have been done soon and about previously bad messaging but that's ridiculous when the course has been corrected.
One thing I will say they might as well go with the mouth swabs since you're dealing with people who never any sort of diagnostic test in their life. Rapid tests come with an understood false positive/negative (usually negative) rate. Oral tests are less accurate (last time I checked) but better when people might straight up mess up a nasal swab. Something is better than nothing.
Resident Cosplay Progressive
No.
Bullshit by bullshit standards, is when an anti-vaxxer, such as the person in the post I was referring to, calling natural immunity "double vaccinated". When it is not.
Of course not. You'd find out you were wrong.
Because literally the first hit is Johns Hopkins which immediately shows the "double vaccinated" is so lame an argument, it takes it behind the shed and unloads a double-barrel into it. Then, glue.
Anyone claiming natural immunity is "double vaccinated" is just flat-out wrong. Oh, and as a reminder, Djokovic didn't have omicron or delta. He tested positive in June 2020, six months before delta. His claim of immunity is just flat-out double false.
Oh, and you can stop saying "vaccination after infection". He didn't get vaccinated. I don't know why you think you're defending him, but the points you are bringing up don't help, so you're not defending him. Kind of makes me wonder why you bothered getting everyone else here proving that you're wrong for the last three pages when you didn't even back up the point you were trying to make.
Catching COVID does not guarantee that your body has produced any lasting antibodies. Theres tons of evidence that backs up the claim. COVID is not a virus that your body gets once and never gets again. The vaccines are giving you body a private lesson in learning how to deal with COVID. So far mRNA does so a good job that your body can still recognize the trick questions (the variants).
Resident Cosplay Progressive
That is ironic.
- - - Updated - - -
Honestly, I have enjoyed the last two years. My family has tried more new things and learned new skills that I ever thought we would. Filling in the deficiencies of distance learning was rough, but it does make people realize what is actually important to learn. I'm sure my kids have been stunted in their developmental learning of English poetry, but they all learned how to cook, and even do home repairs. arks see
I'm not a person who needs a lot of close contact with others, so the social distancing wasn't a problem for me. I get that many are social butterflies, who love bars and clubs... but I can go forever without them. I have eaten out at a sit-down restaurant twice (I think) since the pandemic started. Sure, I still have a risk of infection, mainly from my wife and kids, but we all mitigate it.
Last edited by Machismo; 2022-01-07 at 12:34 PM.
Yes, people are discussing that - but missing that there are two parts to this:
How protected are you from future infection after a past infection (assuming you didn't die)? That's a valid scientific question; some vaccines for other diseases give a lot better protection than infection (HPV) - some give less.
What policies should we have for people that have been infected? At the start it made some sense to treat them similarly as vaccinated, but once we have vaccines in large numbers that case is weaker, and the downside with treated infected as kind-of-vaccinated is that it "rewards" behavior we as a society want to discourage.
Discouragement is not just the risk-aspect; additionally there has also been multiple times when testing capacity has been limited in several countries - so there are lots of persons who believed they had covid but didn't get tested. If getting tested had some award that means some will try to cut to the line of the testing just to get treated as vaccinated afterwards; that's not good either.
There are also multiple vaccines that give different levels of protection; countries normally treat all they have allowed as the same from the perspective of vaccine-passport even if they know that some are less effective.
- - - Updated - - -
But not unprecedented.
The Russian vaccine-trial for Sputnik had two persons dying of covid-19 that they got around the time of vaccination - back then I speculated that they got infected during the vaccination (or when getting to/from the site).
Last edited by Forogil; 2022-01-07 at 12:56 PM.
Don't forget, people who are touting the benefits of natural resistance are still alive. The people who caught it and died, they aren't making that argument.
Because they died. From the disease.
Seriously though the people who want this argument to be true are hoping they can just pop some malaria medicine, horse dewormer, or admittely that one pill that's showing promise and...just remain symptomatic spreaders with bad but not fatal symtoms.
And then there's this. Like I said before, Djokovic did not have delta or omicron. His natural antibodies are better than no defense at all, but his body isn't on high alert for the two current dominant strains.
He is not "double vaccinated". That is bullshit even by bullshit standards, and anyone defending him is just embazzering themselves.
- - - Updated - - -
NYTimes tracker -- I will continue to use that, I think having multiple sources report basically the same thing lends validity to them all plus I paid for the sub Imma use it dammit -- puts the new 7-daily average at 610,000 and due to rise.
We haven't peaked yet.